/plan-feature
Create a comprehensive implementation plan for an Archon feature
$ npx -y skills add coleam00/Archon --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/plan-feature
Context preview
What this command does when you run it.
Create a comprehensive implementation plan for an Archon feature
Command definition
plan-feature.mddescription: Create a comprehensive implementation plan for an Archon feature
argument-hint: <feature-name-or-description>
Plan Feature: Comprehensive Archon Implementation Planning
Objective
Produce a detailed, actionable implementation plan for: **$ARGUMENTS**
The plan will be saved to `.claude/archon/plans/{kebab-case-name}.md` and is designed to be consumed by the `/execute` command.
---
Phase 1: Feature Understanding
Restate the feature request in your own words. Identify:
1. **Problem being solved** — What user pain point or capability gap does this address? 2. **Success criteria** — What does "done" look like? How will we verify it works? 3. **Scope boundaries** — What is explicitly in scope vs. out of scope? 4. **Package impact** — Which of the 8 packages are affected? (`paths`, `git`, `isolation`, `workflows`, `core`, `adapters`, `server`, `web`) 5. **Interface changes** — Does this touch `IPlatformAdapter`, `IAgentProvider`, `IDatabase`, or `IWorkflowStore`? New interfaces needed?
---
Phase 2: Codebase Intelligence
Use subagents to perform targeted codebase research in parallel. Spawn separate subagents for:
**Subagent A — Affected package deep-dive:** Read all relevant source files in the affected packages. Map the current data flow. Identify every file that will need to change.
**Subagent B — Interface and type contracts:** Read `packages/core/src/types/` and relevant `index.ts` exports. Understand what interfaces exist and how they're consumed across packages.
**Subagent C — Test patterns:** Find existing test files similar to the area of change:
find packages/ -name "*.test.ts" | head -30
Read 2-3 representative test files to understand mocking patterns, assertion style, and `mock.module()` isolation requirements per package.
**Subagent D — Related prior work:**
git log --oneline --all | head -20
Read recent commits touching relevant files to understand change patterns.
Synthesize findings: current state, gaps, constraints.
---
Phase 3: External Research (if needed)
If the feature involves external APIs, new libraries, or unfamiliar patterns, use web search to research:
- Relevant SDK documentation
- Known gotchas or version incompatibilities
- Community patterns for the problem domain
Document any specific findings that affect the implementation approach.
---
Phase 4: Strategic Thinking
Before writing tasks, reason through:
**Architecture decisions:**
- Where does this logic belong? Apply SRP — keep each module focused on one concern.
- Does this require a new package, or extends an existing one?
- What's the dependency direction? Never create circular deps (paths ← git ← isolation/workflows ← core ← adapters ← server).
**Interface design:**
- Prefer extending existing narrow interfaces over creating fat ones.
- New interface methods only if they have a concrete current caller.
- Avoid adding methods to `IPlatformAdapter` or `IAgentProvider` unless essential.
**Test isolation strategy:**
- `mock.module()` is process-global and permanent in Bun — plan test file placement carefully.
- If adding tests to packages with split test batches (core, workflows, adapters, isolation),
determine which batch the new test belongs to.
**ESLint compliance:**
- All new functions need explicit return types.
- No `any` without justification.
- Zero-warning policy enforced in CI.
**Rollback plan:**
- What is the blast radius if this goes wrong?
- Are changes reversible without a DB migration?
---
Phase 5: Plan Generation
Generate the implementation plan at `.claude/archon/plans/{kebab-case-feature-name}.md`:
# Plan: {Feature Name}
## Overview
{1-2 sentence summary of what this implements and why.}
## Success Criteria
- [ ] {Verifiable criterion 1}
- [ ] {Verifiable criterion 2}
- [ ] Passes `bun run validate` (type-check + lint + format + tests)
## Affected Packages
- `@archon/{package}` — {what changes}
## Architecture Notes
{Key decisions, tradeoffs, interface changes.}
## Implementation Tasks
### Task 1: {descriptive name}
**File:** `packages/{package}/src/{file}.ts`
**Type:** Create | Modify | Delete
**Description:** {What this task does and why.}
**Depends on:** {Task N, or "none"}
### Task 2: ...
## Validation Steps
1. `bun run type-check` — must pass with zero errors
2. `bun run lint` — must pass with zero warnings
3. `bun run format:check` — must pass
4. `bun run test` — must pass (run via `bun --filter '*' test` for isolation)
5. Manual test: {specific curl command or UI steps to verify the feature}
## Rollback Notes
{How to safely revert if needed.}Task Ordering Rules
- Order by dependency (blocked tasks come after their dependencies).
- Group by package when possible to minimize context switching.
- Database schema changes (if any) come first.
- Type/interface definitions before implementations.
- Tests after implementations.
- Frontend after backend API is stable.
Prohibited Patterns (flag in plan if you see a risk)
- `import * as core from '@archon/core'` — use named imports
- `any` type without justification comment
- Circular package dependencies
- `git clean -fd` in any script or test
- `bun test` from repo root (use `bun run test` or `bun --filter '*' test`)
---
Output
1. Save the plan file to `.claude/archon/plans/{kebab-case-name}.md` 2. Print the plan to the conversation 3. Summarize: number of tasks, affected packages, estimated complexity (low/medium/high), and any risks or open questions that need resolution before execution.
Read more
description: Create a comprehensive implementation plan for an Archon feature argument-hint: <feature-name-or-description>
Plan Feature: Comprehensive Archon Implementation Planning
Objective
Produce a detailed, actionable implementation plan for: **$ARGUMENTS**
The plan will be saved to `.claude/archon/plans/{kebab-case-name}.md` and is designed to be consumed by the `/execute` command.
---
Phase 1: Feature Understanding
Restate the feature request in your own words. Identify:
1. **Problem being solved** — What user pain point or capability gap does this address? 2. **Success criteria** — What does "done" look like? How will we verify it works? 3. **Scope boundaries** — What is explicitly in scope vs. out of scope? 4. **Package impact** — Which of the 8 packages are affected? (`paths`, `git`, `isolation`, `workflows`, `core`, `adapters`, `server`, `web`) 5. **Interface changes** — Does this touch `IPlatformAdapter`, `IAgentProvider`, `IDatabase`, or `IWorkflowStore`? New interfaces needed?
---
Phase 2: Codebase Intelligence
Use subagents to perform targeted codebase research in parallel. Spawn separate subagents for:
**Subagent A — Affected package deep-dive:** Read all relevant source files in the affected packages. Map the current data flow. Identify every file that will need to change.
**Subagent B — Interface and type contracts:** Read `packages/core/src/types/` and relevant `index.ts` exports. Understand what interfaces exist and how they're consumed across packages.
**Subagent C — Test patterns:** Find existing test files similar to the area of change:
find packages/ -name "*.test.ts" | head -30
Read 2-3 representative test files to understand mocking patterns, assertion style, and `mock.module()` isolation requirements per package.
**Subagent D — Related prior work:**
git log --oneline --all | head -20
Read recent commits touching relevant files to understand change patterns.
Synthesize findings: current state, gaps, constraints.
---
Phase 3: External Research (if needed)
If the feature involves external APIs, new libraries, or unfamiliar patterns, use web search to research:
- Relevant SDK documentation
- Known gotchas or version incompatibilities
- Community patterns for the problem domain
Document any specific findings that affect the implementation approach.
---
Phase 4: Strategic Thinking
Before writing tasks, reason through:
**Architecture decisions:**
- Where does this logic belong? Apply SRP — keep each module focused on one concern.
- Does this require a new package, or extends an existing one?
- What's the dependency direction? Never create circular deps (paths ← git ← isolation/workflows ← core ← adapters ← server).
**Interface design:**
- Prefer extending existing narrow interfaces over creating fat ones.
- New interface methods only if they have a concrete current caller.
- Avoid adding methods to `IPlatformAdapter` or `IAgentProvider` unless essential.
**Test isolation strategy:**
- `mock.module()` is process-global and permanent in Bun — plan test file placement carefully.
- If adding tests to packages with split test batches (core, workflows, adapters, isolation),
determine which batch the new test belongs to.
**ESLint compliance:**
- All new functions need explicit return types.
- No `any` without justification.
- Zero-warning policy enforced in CI.
**Rollback plan:**
- What is the blast radius if this goes wrong?
- Are changes reversible without a DB migration?
---
Phase 5: Plan Generation
Generate the implementation plan at `.claude/archon/plans/{kebab-case-feature-name}.md`:
# Plan: {Feature Name}
## Overview
{1-2 sentence summary of what this implements and why.}
## Success Criteria
- [ ] {Verifiable criterion 1}
- [ ] {Verifiable criterion 2}
- [ ] Passes `bun run validate` (type-check + lint + format + tests)
## Affected Packages
- `@archon/{package}` — {what changes}
## Architecture Notes
{Key decisions, tradeoffs, interface changes.}
## Implementation Tasks
### Task 1: {descriptive name}
**File:** `packages/{package}/src/{file}.ts`
**Type:** Create | Modify | Delete
**Description:** {What this task does and why.}
**Depends on:** {Task N, or "none"}
### Task 2: ...
## Validation Steps
1. `bun run type-check` — must pass with zero errors
2. `bun run lint` — must pass with zero warnings
3. `bun run format:check` — must pass
4. `bun run test` — must pass (run via `bun --filter '*' test` for isolation)
5. Manual test: {specific curl command or UI steps to verify the feature}
## Rollback Notes
{How to safely revert if needed.}Task Ordering Rules
- Order by dependency (blocked tasks come after their dependencies).
- Group by package when possible to minimize context switching.
- Database schema changes (if any) come first.
- Type/interface definitions before implementations.
- Tests after implementations.
- Frontend after backend API is stable.
Prohibited Patterns (flag in plan if you see a risk)
- `import * as core from '@archon/core'` — use named imports
- `any` type without justification comment
- Circular package dependencies
- `git clean -fd` in any script or test
- `bun test` from repo root (use `bun run test` or `bun --filter '*' test`)
---
Output
1. Save the plan file to `.claude/archon/plans/{kebab-case-name}.md` 2. Print the plan to the conversation 3. Summarize: number of tasks, affected packages, estimated complexity (low/medium/high), and any risks or open questions that need resolution before execution.
The first open-source harness builder for AI coding. Make AI coding deterministic and repeatable.
Repo: coleam00/Archon
Other commands on archon.
- /commit
Create an atomic commit for current changes
Open command - /create-command
Meta command creator - generates slash commands following established patterns
Open command - /execute
Execute an Archon implementation plan file
Open command - /implement-fix
Implement fix from RCA document for GitHub issue
Open command - /rca
Analyze and document root cause for a GitHub issue
Open command - /handoff
Write a session handoff document for the next agent or session
Open command

