/compose-ui-testing-patterns
Use when writing or reviewing Jetpack Compose UI tests, screenshot tests, previews, semantics assertions, fake image loading, keyboard input, focus assertions, interaction state (hover/pressed/focused), or tests for plain state-driven UI composables.
$ npx -y skills add chrisbanes/skills --skill compose-ui-testing-patterns --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/compose-ui-testing-patterns
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when writing or reviewing Jetpack Compose UI tests, screenshot tests, previews, semantics assertions, fake image loading, keyboard input, focus assertions, interaction state (hover/pressed/focused), or tests for plain state-driven UI composables.
SKILL.md
compose-ui-testing-patterns.SKILL.mdname: compose-ui-testing-patterns
description: Use when writing or reviewing Jetpack Compose UI tests, screenshot tests, previews, semantics assertions, fake image loading, keyboard input, focus assertions, interaction state (hover/pressed/focused), or tests for plain state-driven UI composables.
Compose: UI testing patterns
Core principle
Test the smallest UI contract that proves the behavior. Prefer plain state-driven UI tests with callbacks. Add integration only when lifecycle, navigation, DI, or platform behavior is the thing under test.
Test target choice
| What you need to prove | Test shape | |---|---| | Text, button, loading/error branch, conditional content | Plain UI Compose test | | Callback wiring from click/input | Plain UI Compose test | | Focus navigation or keyboard behavior | Compose test with key input | | Visual layout, clipping, elevation, typography, image composition | Screenshot test | | State holder updates UI correctly | State holder/unit test plus one wiring smoke test | | Hover, pressed, focused, dragged interaction state | Plain UI test with MutableInteractionSource | | Navigation, lifecycle, DI integration | Integration test |
Prefer plain UI tests
If the screen has a state holder/UI split, test the plain UI composable:
composeTestRule.setContent {
ProfileScreen(
state = ProfileUiState(name = "Ada", canSave = true),
onNameChange = {},
onSaveClick = { saved = true },
onBackClick = {},
)
}
composeTestRule.onNodeWithText("Ada").assertIsDisplayed()
composeTestRule.onNodeWithText("Save").performClick()
assertThat(saved).isTrue()This avoids constructing ViewModels, components, repositories, navigation, and dependency graphs for layout behavior.
Semantics first
Assert semantics when behavior is semantic:
- Text exists: `onNodeWithText`.
- Button is enabled/disabled: `assertIsEnabled`, `assertIsNotEnabled`.
- Content is selected/focused/toggled: use semantics assertions.
- Content is absent: `assertDoesNotExist`.
Use test tags for nodes that have no stable user-visible text or where multiple nodes share text. Do not use tags as the first choice for all assertions; user-visible semantics are usually stronger.
Callback testing
Use simple counters or captured values:
var selectedId: String? = null
composeTestRule.setContent {
ItemList(
items = listOf(ItemUi("movie-1", "Movie")),
onItemClick = { selectedId = it },
)
}
composeTestRule.onNodeWithText("Movie").performClick()
assertThat(selectedId).isEqualTo("movie-1")For plain captured callback values, a direct assertion after the action is usually enough. Use `runOnIdle` when the assertion needs Compose to finish applying snapshot state, recomposition, or queued UI work before reading the result.
Interaction state with MutableInteractionSource
When a composable's appearance or behavior depends on interaction state (hover, focus, press, drag), inject a `MutableInteractionSource` and emit the desired state directly. Do not try to simulate pointer/mouse events to trigger interaction states — that approach is fragile, environment-dependent, and produces flaky tests.
val interactionSource = MutableInteractionSource()
composeTestRule.setContent {
OutlinedButton(
onClick = {},
interactionSource = interactionSource,
)
}
// Assert default (un-hovered) state
composeTestRule.onNodeWithText("OutlinedButton").assertIsDisplayed()
// Emit hover — interactionSource.emit is a suspend function,
// so call it from a test coroutine scope.
TestScope().launch {
interactionSource.emit(HoverInteraction.Enter())
}
composeTestRule.waitForIdle()
// Assert the visual/semantic change that hover produces
// (e.g., border color, elevation, or capture for screenshot test)
composeTestRule.onNodeWithText("OutlinedButton").assertIsDisplayed()The same pattern works for `PressInteraction.Press` / `Release` / `Cancel`, `FocusInteraction.Focus` / `Unfocus`, and `DragInteraction.Start` / `Stop` / `Cancel`. Emit the entry interaction, `waitForIdle`, then assert the result.
Key points:
- **Always inject `MutableInteractionSource`** rather than relying on the default internal source. This gives you full control over state transitions.
- **Emit interactions from a coroutine scope** (e.g. `TestScope().launch { }`) since `emit` is a suspend function. Do not use `LaunchedEffect` — that is a production Compose effect, not a test tool.
- **Assert the *result* of the interaction** (visual change, semantic change, enabled state), not the interaction itself. The interaction source is a test *driver*, not the assertion target.
- **Use this for screenshot tests too** — emit the interaction state, then capture the screenshot for a deterministic hover/press/focus visual.
Keyboard and focus
For keyboard, TV, and desktop UI, drive navigation with the same input model users use (keys/D-pad), not clicks alone. Assert focused semantics, not colors or scale; reserve screenshots for visual focus treatment.
Details—focus graph, `FocusRequester`, restoration, key handlers, and test patterns: [`compose-focus-navigation`](../compose-focus-navigation/SKILL.md).
Screenshot tests
Use screenshots for visual contracts that semantics cannot prove:
- Layout spacing/alignment.
- Themed colors, typography, elevation, shadows.
- Image composition, gradients, overlays.
- Focus highlight appearance.
- Loading skeletons or dense visual states.
Keep screenshot state deterministic:
- Use fixed state data.
- Freeze clocks or animation progress when possible.
- Replace network/image loading with fake or preview handlers.
- Avoid asserting dynamic text such as current time unless controlled.
Fake images and platform services
When image content is irrelevant, fake the loader and assert the requested model if that is the behavior. The exact hook depends on your image library; a project helper mi
Read more
name: compose-ui-testing-patterns description: Use when writing or reviewing Jetpack Compose UI tests, screenshot tests, previews, semantics assertions, fake image loading, keyboard input, focus assertions, interaction state (hover/pressed/focused), or tests for plain state-driven UI composables.
Compose: UI testing patterns
Core principle
Test the smallest UI contract that proves the behavior. Prefer plain state-driven UI tests with callbacks. Add integration only when lifecycle, navigation, DI, or platform behavior is the thing under test.
Test target choice
| What you need to prove | Test shape | |---|---| | Text, button, loading/error branch, conditional content | Plain UI Compose test | | Callback wiring from click/input | Plain UI Compose test | | Focus navigation or keyboard behavior | Compose test with key input | | Visual layout, clipping, elevation, typography, image composition | Screenshot test | | State holder updates UI correctly | State holder/unit test plus one wiring smoke test | | Hover, pressed, focused, dragged interaction state | Plain UI test with MutableInteractionSource | | Navigation, lifecycle, DI integration | Integration test |
Prefer plain UI tests
If the screen has a state holder/UI split, test the plain UI composable:
composeTestRule.setContent {
ProfileScreen(
state = ProfileUiState(name = "Ada", canSave = true),
onNameChange = {},
onSaveClick = { saved = true },
onBackClick = {},
)
}
composeTestRule.onNodeWithText("Ada").assertIsDisplayed()
composeTestRule.onNodeWithText("Save").performClick()
assertThat(saved).isTrue()This avoids constructing ViewModels, components, repositories, navigation, and dependency graphs for layout behavior.
Semantics first
Assert semantics when behavior is semantic:
- Text exists: `onNodeWithText`.
- Button is enabled/disabled: `assertIsEnabled`, `assertIsNotEnabled`.
- Content is selected/focused/toggled: use semantics assertions.
- Content is absent: `assertDoesNotExist`.
Use test tags for nodes that have no stable user-visible text or where multiple nodes share text. Do not use tags as the first choice for all assertions; user-visible semantics are usually stronger.
Callback testing
Use simple counters or captured values:
var selectedId: String? = null
composeTestRule.setContent {
ItemList(
items = listOf(ItemUi("movie-1", "Movie")),
onItemClick = { selectedId = it },
)
}
composeTestRule.onNodeWithText("Movie").performClick()
assertThat(selectedId).isEqualTo("movie-1")For plain captured callback values, a direct assertion after the action is usually enough. Use `runOnIdle` when the assertion needs Compose to finish applying snapshot state, recomposition, or queued UI work before reading the result.
Interaction state with MutableInteractionSource
When a composable's appearance or behavior depends on interaction state (hover, focus, press, drag), inject a `MutableInteractionSource` and emit the desired state directly. Do not try to simulate pointer/mouse events to trigger interaction states — that approach is fragile, environment-dependent, and produces flaky tests.
val interactionSource = MutableInteractionSource()
composeTestRule.setContent {
OutlinedButton(
onClick = {},
interactionSource = interactionSource,
)
}
// Assert default (un-hovered) state
composeTestRule.onNodeWithText("OutlinedButton").assertIsDisplayed()
// Emit hover — interactionSource.emit is a suspend function,
// so call it from a test coroutine scope.
TestScope().launch {
interactionSource.emit(HoverInteraction.Enter())
}
composeTestRule.waitForIdle()
// Assert the visual/semantic change that hover produces
// (e.g., border color, elevation, or capture for screenshot test)
composeTestRule.onNodeWithText("OutlinedButton").assertIsDisplayed()The same pattern works for `PressInteraction.Press` / `Release` / `Cancel`, `FocusInteraction.Focus` / `Unfocus`, and `DragInteraction.Start` / `Stop` / `Cancel`. Emit the entry interaction, `waitForIdle`, then assert the result.
Key points:
- **Always inject `MutableInteractionSource`** rather than relying on the default internal source. This gives you full control over state transitions.
- **Emit interactions from a coroutine scope** (e.g. `TestScope().launch { }`) since `emit` is a suspend function. Do not use `LaunchedEffect` — that is a production Compose effect, not a test tool.
- **Assert the *result* of the interaction** (visual change, semantic change, enabled state), not the interaction itself. The interaction source is a test *driver*, not the assertion target.
- **Use this for screenshot tests too** — emit the interaction state, then capture the screenshot for a deterministic hover/press/focus visual.
Keyboard and focus
For keyboard, TV, and desktop UI, drive navigation with the same input model users use (keys/D-pad), not clicks alone. Assert focused semantics, not colors or scale; reserve screenshots for visual focus treatment.
Details—focus graph, `FocusRequester`, restoration, key handlers, and test patterns: [`compose-focus-navigation`](../compose-focus-navigation/SKILL.md).
Screenshot tests
Use screenshots for visual contracts that semantics cannot prove:
- Layout spacing/alignment.
- Themed colors, typography, elevation, shadows.
- Image composition, gradients, overlays.
- Focus highlight appearance.
- Loading skeletons or dense visual states.
Keep screenshot state deterministic:
- Use fixed state data.
- Freeze clocks or animation progress when possible.
- Replace network/image loading with fake or preview handlers.
- Avoid asserting dynamic text such as current time unless controlled.
Fake images and platform services
When image content is irrelevant, fake the loader and assert the requested model if that is the behavior. The exact hook depends on your image library; a project helper mi
A set of skills for Kotlin, Jetpack Compose, and Android development.
Repo: chrisbanes/skills
Other skills on chrisbanes-skills.
- /compose-animations
Use when writing or reviewing Jetpack Compose motion: visibility enter/exit, animating one property toward a target, color or size transitions, multiple properties from one state, switching composable content, or choosing between AnimatedVisibility, animate*AsState,
Open skill - /compose-component-design
Use when designing or reviewing reusable Jetpack Compose component APIs with modifier parameters, root layout placement, caller-provided variable content, primitive content parameters, optional content, or boolean shape flags.
Open skill - /compose-focus-navigation
Use when writing or reviewing Jetpack Compose UI for TV, keyboard, desktop, accessibility focus, D-pad navigation, FocusRequester, focusProperties, key events, or initial focus behavior.
Open skill - /compose-performance
Use when investigating Jetpack Compose recomposition cost, compiler stability reports, skippability, unstable parameters, frame-rate State reads, cross-phase snapshot back-writing, or @ReadOnlyComposable contracts.
Open skill - /compose-state-and-effects
Use when writing or reviewing Jetpack Compose state ownership, remember state, state hoisting, screen state holders, LaunchedEffect, DisposableEffect, SideEffect, Flow collection, navigation, snackbar, analytics, or focus requests.
Open skill - /kotlin-api-design
Use when designing or reviewing Kotlin function ownership, member or extension functions, factories, single-field domain types, value classes, data classes, Kotlin Multiplatform expect/actual declarations, or platform service boundaries.
Open skill

