blog
Write release blog posts for Chorus — problem-first narrative, bilingual (zh/en), following the project's editorial style.
Chorus Proposal workflow — create proposals with document and task drafts, manage dependency DAG, validate and submit for review.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add Chorus-AIDLC/Chorus --skill proposal --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add Chorus-AIDLC/Chorus --skill proposal -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add Chorus-AIDLC/Chorus --skill proposal -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add Chorus-AIDLC/Chorus --skill proposal -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add Chorus-AIDLC/Chorus --skill proposal -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add Chorus-AIDLC/Chorus --skill proposal -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add Chorus-AIDLC/Chorus --skill proposal -a windsurf -y
name: proposal description: Chorus Proposal workflow — create proposals with document and task drafts, manage dependency DAG, validate and submit for review. license: AGPL-3.0 metadata: author: chorus version: "0.24.0" category: project-management mcp_server: chorus
This skill covers the **Planning** stage of the AI-DLC workflow: creating Proposals that contain document drafts (PRD, tech design) and task drafts with dependency DAGs, then submitting them for Admin review.
---
After an Idea's elaboration is resolved (see `/idea`), the PM Agent creates a Proposal — a container that holds document drafts and task drafts. On Admin approval, these drafts materialize into real Documents and Tasks.
Elaboration resolved --> Create Proposal --> Add drafts --> Validate --> Submit --> Admin /review
---
**Proposal Management:**
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | `chorus_pm_create_proposal` | Create empty proposal container | | `chorus_pm_validate_proposal` | Validate proposal completeness (returns errors, warnings, info) | | `chorus_pm_submit_proposal` | Submit proposal for Admin approval (draft -> pending) |
**Document Drafts:**
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | `chorus_pm_add_document_draft` | Add document draft to proposal | | `chorus_pm_update_document_draft` | Update document draft content | | `chorus_pm_remove_document_draft` | Remove document draft from proposal |
**Task Drafts:**
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | `chorus_pm_add_task_draft` | Add task draft (returns draftUuid for dependency chaining) | | `chorus_pm_update_task_draft` | Update task draft | | `chorus_pm_remove_task_draft` | Remove task draft from proposal |
**Post-Approval (tasks exist):**
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | `chorus_create_tasks` | Batch create tasks (supports intra-batch dependencies via draftUuid) | | `chorus_pm_assign_task` | Assign a task to a Developer Agent | | `chorus_pm_create_document` | Create standalone document | | `chorus_pm_update_document` | Update document content (increments version) | | `chorus_update_task` (with `addDependsOn` / `removeDependsOn`) | Add or remove task dependencies (with cycle detection) |
**Shared tools** (checkin, query, comment, search, notifications): see `/chorus`
---
Read the confirmed input Idea(s) or Documents, current specifications, References and recent context before drafting. Reuse existing findings first; invoke `/skill:research` ([shared rules](../research/SKILL.md)) only for a new factual design gap or explicit user request, subject to explicit skip. Supply the Proposal stage, focused question, existing evidence and budget. Do not automatically repeat Idea research, including on a resumed planning wake; this route also applies to form/MCP-created inputs without a research flag.
If the Proposal does not exist yet, retain candidate source URLs/titles/types in the current context, then include them in `references[]` on the Step 1 `chorus_pm_create_proposal` call when possible. Read `chorus_get_proposal` afterward to obtain actual `references[].uuid`; inline creation returns the container UUID, not individual evidence UUIDs. If it already exists, reuse its evidence or attach new sources via `chorus_add_reference` and take the returned reference `uuid`. Only then write citations such as `[1](ref:<actual-reference-uuid>)` beside supported statements in the design/specifications. Never invent UUIDs or substitute the Proposal UUID.
In OpenSpec/spec-lite modes, resolve the existing spec mode and locator as below, update authoritative local files with findings and real citations, then mirror file bytes using `chorus mcp call … --arg-file content=<file>` (or the port's existing file-reading wrapper). No hand-typed MCP document `content`; spec-lite's durable `spec.md` remains local-only. Free-form mode keeps its normal draft-saving path. Empty/partial results preserve unknowns and continue preparation. Research does not submit, approve, or bypass revision restrictions; pending/approved proposals retain their existing revision gates. A Tracker research-only instruction returns through the Idea route instead of entering this drafting workflow.
**Resolve the spec mode (Step 1.5) BEFORE this create.** In OpenSpec and spec-lite modes the container's `description` MUST carry a locator line (`OpenSpec change slug: <slug>` or `Spec-lite: .chorus/specs/<slug>/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<change-slug>/`), and `description` can only be set at creation — decide the mode + slug/dated-path first and include that line in this single call. Free-form mode omits any locator line.
**Recommended approach:** Create the proposal container first (with the mode's locator line in `description` when applicable), then incrementally add document and task drafts one by one.
chorus_pm_create_proposal({
projectUuid: "<project-uuid>",
title: "Implement <feature name>",
description: "Analysis and implementation plan for Idea #xxx",
inputType: "idea",
inputUuids: ["<idea-uuid>"]
})**Multiple Ideas:** You can combine multiple ideas into one proposal by passing multiple UUIDs in `inputUuids`.
> **A theme cannot be a proposal input** — `chorus_pm_create_proposal` rejects any input idea with `isContainer = true`. Derive a child idea from the theme and write the proposal on the child instead. (See the theme-ideas section of the `/idea` skill.)
The spec mode is **already computed** by the chorus-pi extension's `session_start` handler (`resolveSpecMode`) — do NOT re-derive it. Read the `## Spec Mode` section of your injected context: it states `CHORUS_SPEC_MODE=<lite|openspec|off>` + a routing note. (No `## Spec Mode` in context? See `openspec-aware` §1 manual fallback — never hand-roll the rule.) Act on that value:
The Agent Harness for AI-Human Collaboration, inspired by the AI-DLC (AI-Driven Development Lifecycle)
Write release blog posts for Chorus — problem-first narrative, bilingual (zh/en), following the project's editorial style.
Use when manually verifying a Chorus frontend change in a real browser — finding local login credentials, driving the running dev…
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through…
Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after…
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the…
Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to…
Use your assigned AgentMail inbox to read email tasks, explicitly send or reply, and check delivery. Provided automatically by…
Create a new Architecture Decision Record with sequential numbering and AgentDB registration