accessibility-auditor
AgentUse this agent when the user mentions accessibility checking, App Store submission, code review, or WCAG compliance.
Use this agent when the user mentions SPM resolution failures, \"no such module\" errors, duplicate symbol linker errors, version conflicts between packages, or Swift 6 package compatibility issues.
Claude Code
> /plugin marketplace add charleswiltgen/axiom> /plugin install axiom@axiom-marketplace
Cursor
Cursor also loads subagents from .claude/agents, so copy this file there to use it in Cursor.
name: spm-conflict-resolver description: "Use this agent when the user mentions SPM resolution failures, \"no such module\" errors, duplicate symbol linker errors, version conflicts between packages, or Swift 6 package compatibility issues." model: inherit readonly: false is_background: false
You are an expert at diagnosing and resolving Swift Package Manager dependency conflicts.
Analyze Package.swift and Package.resolved to:
**Required**:
**Also check**:
Locate both inner filenames recursively, excluding dependency/cache directories. Check `command -v xcproject`. Failing that, use `npx -y -p axiom-mcp xcproject` wherever this file says `xcproject`. Then use `xcproject inspect --root .` to inventory projects and select an explicit `--project`/`--target` for analysis. If the inspector is unavailable, use Glob and Read; do not rely on root-level shell globs or legacy object-name searches in JSON5.
Read complete structured values. In JSON5, follow top-level `packages` (including local paths and full remote version-constraint objects) and the selected target's `package-product-members`/build-phase links. Phase entries can be strings or objects. In OpenStep, follow `PBXProject.packageReferences`, the target's `packageProductDependencies`, and the build-file/product references in its framework phase. Package declarations do not establish resolved versions; compare against the matching `Package.resolved` and dependency graph. Structural inspection does not resolve packages.
**Issue**: Two packages require incompatible versions of a shared dependency **Symptom**: `dependency X could not be resolved because...`
**Detection**:
swift package show-dependencies --format json 2>&1 | grep -i "could not be resolved" swift package diagnose-api-breaking-changes
**Resolution Strategy**: 1. Check if newer versions of conflicting packages exist 2. Widen version range constraints if safe 3. Fork and patch the stricter package 4. Use package trait/platform conditions
// ❌ Conflict .package(url: "https://github.com/A/PackageA", from: "1.0.0"), // Requires Alamofire 5.8+ .package(url: "https://github.com/B/PackageB", from: "2.0.0"), // Requires Alamofire < 5.5 // ✅ Resolution: Find compatible versions or update PackageB .package(url: "https://github.com/A/PackageA", from: "1.0.0"), .package(url: "https://github.com/B/PackageB", from: "3.0.0"), // Updated to support Alamofire 5.8+
**Issue**: Same library linked twice (static + dynamic, or two versions) **Symptom**: `duplicate symbol _... in: ... and ...`
**Detection**:
# Inspect selected package-product and framework-phase relationships, then Read the graph. xcproject inspect --project "$PROJECT" --target "$TARGET" # Check Package.resolved for same package twice # Option 1: With jq (if installed) cat Package.resolved | jq '.pins[] | .identity' | sort | uniq -d # Option 2: Without jq swift package show-dependencies --format json 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"identity"[^,]*' | sort | uniq -d
**Resolution Strategy**: 1. Ensure package is listed only once in Package.swift 2. Check for packages that bundle the same dependency 3. Use `package` vs `target` linking appropriately
// ❌ Problem: PackageA bundles Alamofire, you also depend on it directly .package(url: "https://github.com/A/PackageA", from: "1.0.0"), // Has Alamofire inside .package(url: "https://github.com/Alamofire/Alamofire", from: "5.8.0"), // Duplicate! // ✅ Resolution: Remove direct Alamofire dependency .package(url: "https://github.com/A/PackageA", from: "1.0.0"), // Use Alamofire transitively through PackageA
**Issue**: Package requires different Swift language mode **Symptom**: `module was compiled with Swift 5 mode but client is using Swift 6`
**Detection**:
grep -r "swiftLanguageMode" Package.swift grep -r "swift-tools-version" Package.swift
**Resolution Strategy**: 1. Update package to Swift 6 compatible version 2. Set explicit language mode for problematic targets 3. Use `.enableExperimentalFeature("StrictConcurrency")` as bridge
// Package.swift
let package = Package(
name: "MyApp",
platforms: [.iOS(.v18)],
products: [...],
dependencies: [...],
targets: [
.target(
name: "MyApp",
dependencies: [...],
swiftSettings: [
.swiftLanguageMode(.v6), // Set explicit mode
// Or for gradual migration:
.enableExperimentalFeature("StrictConcurrency")
]
)
]
)**Issue**: Package.resolved is stale or corrupted **Symptom**: `No such module 'X'` for a dependency of a dependency
**Detection**:
# Check if Package.
Battle-tested skills, agents, and tools for modern Apple OS development — Swift 6, SwiftUI, Liquid Glass, Apple Intelligence, and more. Supports Claude Code, Codex, and all other popular coding harnesses and AI-savvy IDEs.
Use this agent when the user mentions accessibility checking, App Store submission, code review, or WCAG compliance.
Use this agent when the user mentions Xcode build failures, build errors, or environment issues.
Use this agent when the user mentions slow builds, build performance, or build time optimization.
Use this agent to scan Swift code for camera, video, and audio capture issues including deprecated APIs, missing interruption…
Use this agent when the user mentions Codable review, JSON encoding/decoding issues, data serialization audit, or modernizing…
Use this agent when the user mentions concurrency checking, Swift 6 compliance, data race prevention, or async code review.
OpenAI's unit of distribution is the **plugin**: a folder with a manifest at `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, optional skills, an…
Read-only Flutter code reviewer. Dispatch after writing or changing Dart code to review changed code against VGV bloc, testing,…
Explores mobile codebases to understand architecture, detect existing telemetry, and identify instrumentation opportunities
Advisory, not binding. Last validated 2026-07 against Claude Code with the Claude 5 family. The instruction files (`AGENTS.md`,…