/test-cases
This skill should be used when generating comprehensive test cases from PRD documents or user requirements. Triggers when users request test case generation, QA planning, test scenario creation, or need structured test documentation. Produces detailed test cases covering
$ npx -y skills add cexll/myclaude --skill test-cases --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/test-cases
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
This skill should be used when generating comprehensive test cases from PRD documents or user requirements. Triggers when users request test case generation, QA planning, test scenario creation, or need structured test documentation. Produces detailed test cases covering
SKILL.md
test-cases.SKILL.mdname: test-cases
description: This skill should be used when generating comprehensive test cases from PRD documents or user requirements. Triggers when users request test case generation, QA planning, test scenario creation, or need structured test documentation. Produces detailed test cases covering functional, edge case, error handling, and state transition scenarios.
license: MIT
Test Cases Generator
This skill generates comprehensive, requirement-driven test cases from PRD documents or user requirements.
Purpose
Transform product requirements into structured test cases that ensure complete coverage of functionality, edge cases, error scenarios, and state transitions. The skill follows a pragmatic testing philosophy: test what matters, ensure every requirement has corresponding test coverage, and maintain test quality over quantity.
When to Use
Trigger this skill when:
- User provides a PRD or requirements document and requests test cases
- User asks to "generate test cases", "create test scenarios", or "plan QA"
- User mentions testing coverage for a feature or requirement
- User needs structured test documentation in markdown format
Core Testing Principles
Follow these principles when generating test cases:
1. **Requirement-driven, not implementation-driven** - Test cases must map directly to requirements, not implementation details 2. **Complete coverage** - Every requirement must have at least one test case covering:
- Happy path (normal use cases)
- Edge cases (boundary values, empty inputs, max limits)
- Error handling (invalid inputs, failure scenarios, permission errors)
- State transitions (if stateful, cover all valid state changes)
3. **Clear and actionable** - Each test case must be executable by a QA engineer without ambiguity 4. **Traceable** - Maintain clear mapping between requirements and test cases
Workflow
Step 1: Gather Requirements
First, identify the source of requirements:
1. If user provides a file path to a PRD, read it using the Read tool 2. If user describes requirements verbally, capture them 3. If requirements are unclear or incomplete, use AskUserQuestion to clarify:
- What are the core user flows?
- What are the acceptance criteria?
- What are the edge cases or error scenarios to consider?
- Are there any state transitions or workflows?
- What platforms or environments need testing?
Step 2: Extract Test Scenarios
Analyze requirements and extract test scenarios:
1. **Functional scenarios** - Normal use cases from requirements 2. **Edge case scenarios** - Boundary conditions, empty states, maximum limits 3. **Error scenarios** - Invalid inputs, permission failures, network errors 4. **State transition scenarios** - If the feature involves state, map all transitions
For each requirement, identify:
- Preconditions (what must be true before testing)
- Test steps (actions to perform)
- Expected results (what should happen)
- Postconditions (state after test completes)
Step 3: Structure Test Cases
Organize test cases using this structure:
# Test Cases: [Feature Name]
## Overview
- **Feature**: [Feature name]
- **Requirements Source**: [PRD file path or description]
- **Test Coverage**: [Summary of what's covered]
- **Last Updated**: [Date]
## Test Case Categories
### 1. Functional Tests
Test cases covering normal user flows and core functionality.
#### TC-F-001: [Test Case Title]
- **Requirement**: [Link to specific requirement]
- **Priority**: [High/Medium/Low]
- **Preconditions**:
- [Condition 1]
- [Condition 2]
- **Test Steps**:
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]
3. [Step 3]
- **Expected Results**:
- [Expected result 1]
- [Expected result 2]
- **Postconditions**: [State after test]
### 2. Edge Case Tests
Test cases covering boundary conditions and unusual inputs.
#### TC-E-001: [Test Case Title]
[Same structure as above]
### 3. Error Handling Tests
Test cases covering error scenarios and failure modes.
#### TC-ERR-001: [Test Case Title]
[Same structure as above]
### 4. State Transition Tests
Test cases covering state changes and workflows (if applicable).
#### TC-ST-001: [Test Case Title]
[Same structure as above]
## Test Coverage Matrix
| Requirement ID | Test Cases | Coverage Status |
|---------------|------------|-----------------|
| REQ-001 | TC-F-001, TC-E-001 | ✓ Complete |
| REQ-002 | TC-F-002 | ⚠ Partial |
## Notes
- [Any additional testing considerations]
- [Known limitations or assumptions]
Step 4: Generate Test Cases
For each identified scenario, create a detailed test case following the structure above. Ensure:
1. **Unique IDs** - Use prefixes: TC-F (functional), TC-E (edge), TC-ERR (error), TC-ST (state) 2. **Clear titles** - Descriptive titles that explain what's being tested 3. **Requirement traceability** - Link each test case to specific requirements 4. **Priority assignment** - Mark critical paths as High priority 5. **Executable steps** - Steps must be clear enough for any QA engineer to execute 6. **Measurable results** - Expected results must be verifiable
Step 5: Validate Coverage
Before finalizing, verify:
1. Every requirement has at least one test case 2. Happy path is covered for all user flows 3. Edge cases are identified for boundary conditions 4. Error scenarios are covered for failure modes 5. State transitions are tested if feature is stateful
If coverage gaps exist, generate additional test cases.
Step 6: Output Test Cases
Write the test cases to `tests/<name>-test-cases.md` where `<name>` is derived from:
- The feature name from the PRD
- The user's specified name
- A sanitized version of the requirement title
Use the Write tool to create the file with the structured test cases.
Step 7: Summary
After generating test cases, provide a brief summary in Chinese:
- Total number of test cases generated
- Coverage breakdown (functional, edge, error, state)
- Any assumptions made or areas needing
Read more
name: test-cases description: This skill should be used when generating comprehensive test cases from PRD documents or user requirements. Triggers when users request test case generation, QA planning, test scenario creation, or need structured test documentation. Produces detailed test cases covering functional, edge case, error handling, and state transition scenarios. license: MIT
Test Cases Generator
This skill generates comprehensive, requirement-driven test cases from PRD documents or user requirements.
Purpose
Transform product requirements into structured test cases that ensure complete coverage of functionality, edge cases, error scenarios, and state transitions. The skill follows a pragmatic testing philosophy: test what matters, ensure every requirement has corresponding test coverage, and maintain test quality over quantity.
When to Use
Trigger this skill when:
- User provides a PRD or requirements document and requests test cases
- User asks to "generate test cases", "create test scenarios", or "plan QA"
- User mentions testing coverage for a feature or requirement
- User needs structured test documentation in markdown format
Core Testing Principles
Follow these principles when generating test cases:
1. **Requirement-driven, not implementation-driven** - Test cases must map directly to requirements, not implementation details 2. **Complete coverage** - Every requirement must have at least one test case covering:
- Happy path (normal use cases)
- Edge cases (boundary values, empty inputs, max limits)
- Error handling (invalid inputs, failure scenarios, permission errors)
- State transitions (if stateful, cover all valid state changes)
3. **Clear and actionable** - Each test case must be executable by a QA engineer without ambiguity 4. **Traceable** - Maintain clear mapping between requirements and test cases
Workflow
Step 1: Gather Requirements
First, identify the source of requirements:
1. If user provides a file path to a PRD, read it using the Read tool 2. If user describes requirements verbally, capture them 3. If requirements are unclear or incomplete, use AskUserQuestion to clarify:
- What are the core user flows?
- What are the acceptance criteria?
- What are the edge cases or error scenarios to consider?
- Are there any state transitions or workflows?
- What platforms or environments need testing?
Step 2: Extract Test Scenarios
Analyze requirements and extract test scenarios:
1. **Functional scenarios** - Normal use cases from requirements 2. **Edge case scenarios** - Boundary conditions, empty states, maximum limits 3. **Error scenarios** - Invalid inputs, permission failures, network errors 4. **State transition scenarios** - If the feature involves state, map all transitions
For each requirement, identify:
- Preconditions (what must be true before testing)
- Test steps (actions to perform)
- Expected results (what should happen)
- Postconditions (state after test completes)
Step 3: Structure Test Cases
Organize test cases using this structure:
# Test Cases: [Feature Name] ## Overview - **Feature**: [Feature name] - **Requirements Source**: [PRD file path or description] - **Test Coverage**: [Summary of what's covered] - **Last Updated**: [Date] ## Test Case Categories ### 1. Functional Tests Test cases covering normal user flows and core functionality. #### TC-F-001: [Test Case Title] - **Requirement**: [Link to specific requirement] - **Priority**: [High/Medium/Low] - **Preconditions**: - [Condition 1] - [Condition 2] - **Test Steps**: 1. [Step 1] 2. [Step 2] 3. [Step 3] - **Expected Results**: - [Expected result 1] - [Expected result 2] - **Postconditions**: [State after test] ### 2. Edge Case Tests Test cases covering boundary conditions and unusual inputs. #### TC-E-001: [Test Case Title] [Same structure as above] ### 3. Error Handling Tests Test cases covering error scenarios and failure modes. #### TC-ERR-001: [Test Case Title] [Same structure as above] ### 4. State Transition Tests Test cases covering state changes and workflows (if applicable). #### TC-ST-001: [Test Case Title] [Same structure as above] ## Test Coverage Matrix | Requirement ID | Test Cases | Coverage Status | |---------------|------------|-----------------| | REQ-001 | TC-F-001, TC-E-001 | ✓ Complete | | REQ-002 | TC-F-002 | ⚠ Partial | ## Notes - [Any additional testing considerations] - [Known limitations or assumptions]
Step 4: Generate Test Cases
For each identified scenario, create a detailed test case following the structure above. Ensure:
1. **Unique IDs** - Use prefixes: TC-F (functional), TC-E (edge), TC-ERR (error), TC-ST (state) 2. **Clear titles** - Descriptive titles that explain what's being tested 3. **Requirement traceability** - Link each test case to specific requirements 4. **Priority assignment** - Mark critical paths as High priority 5. **Executable steps** - Steps must be clear enough for any QA engineer to execute 6. **Measurable results** - Expected results must be verifiable
Step 5: Validate Coverage
Before finalizing, verify:
1. Every requirement has at least one test case 2. Happy path is covered for all user flows 3. Edge cases are identified for boundary conditions 4. Error scenarios are covered for failure modes 5. State transitions are tested if feature is stateful
If coverage gaps exist, generate additional test cases.
Step 6: Output Test Cases
Write the test cases to `tests/<name>-test-cases.md` where `<name>` is derived from:
- The feature name from the PRD
- The user's specified name
- A sanitized version of the requirement title
Use the Write tool to create the file with the structured test cases.
Step 7: Summary
After generating test cases, provide a brief summary in Chinese:
- Total number of test cases generated
- Coverage breakdown (functional, edge, error, state)
- Any assumptions made or areas needing
AI-powered development automation with multi-backend execution (Codex/Claude/Gemini/OpenCode)
Repo: cexll/myclaude
Other skills on myclaude.
- /browser
This skill should be used for browser automation tasks using Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP). Triggers when users need to launch Chrome with remote debugging, navigate pages, execute JavaScript in browser context, capture screenshots, or interactively select DOM elements. No MCP
Open skill - /codeagent
Execute codeagent-wrapper for multi-backend AI code tasks. Supports Codex, Claude, Gemini, and OpenCode backends with agent presets, skill injection, file references (@syntax), worktree isolation, parallel execution, and structured output.
Open skill - /dev
Extreme lightweight end-to-end development workflow with requirements clarification, intelligent backend selection, parallel codeagent execution, and mandatory 90% test coverage
Open skill - /do
This skill should be used for structured feature development with codebase understanding. Triggers on /do command. Provides a 5-phase workflow (Understand, Clarify, Design, Implement, Complete) using codeagent-wrapper to orchestrate code-explorer, code-architect, code-reviewer,
Open skill - /harness
This skill should be used for multi-session autonomous agent work requiring progress checkpointing, failure recovery, and task dependency management. Triggers on '/harness' command, or when a task involves many subtasks needing progress persistence, sleep/resume cycles across
Open skill - /omo
Use this skill when you see `/omo`. Multi-agent orchestration for "code analysis / bug investigation / fix planning / implementation". Choose the minimal agent set and order based on task type + risk; recipes below show common patterns.
Open skill

