/amj-writing-style
Use for full-manuscript prose polish of an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — front-loading the argument, active voice, structure, and AOM house style. Polishes language and structure; it does not create the theoretical contribution (amj-contribution-framing) or
$ npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amj-writing-style --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/amj-writing-style
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use for full-manuscript prose polish of an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — front-loading the argument, active voice, structure, and AOM house style. Polishes language and structure; it does not create the theoretical contribution (amj-contribution-framing) or
SKILL.md
amj-writing-style.SKILL.mdname: amj-writing-style
description: Use for full-manuscript prose polish of an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — front-loading the argument, active voice, structure, and AOM house style. Polishes language and structure; it does not create the theoretical contribution (amj-contribution-framing) or fix the analysis (amj-data-analysis).
Writing Style (amj-writing-style)
When to trigger
- The argument is buried under jargon, hedging, or passive constructions
- The introduction does not make the contribution clear in its first page
- Section logic wanders; the reader cannot follow the theory → method → results → discussion arc
- Sentences are long and nominalized; the "actor doing the action" is hidden
- This is late-stage polish *after* the theory, design, and contribution are settled
The AMJ prose standard
AMJ values prose that is **rigorous yet readable**: the theoretical argument should be visible to a reader from another division. Front-load the point — say what you argue, then support it. Write in the active voice with human/organizational actors as subjects. Hedge precisely (state what the data show), not defensively (avoid stacking "may possibly suggest"). AMJ's *From the Editors* (FTE) series has devoted whole editorials to storytelling and crafting the introduction — the journal genuinely rewards a paper that "tells a story," so treat narrative arc as a substantive standard, not decoration.
Structure to enforce
Standard full structure: **Introduction → Theory & Hypotheses → Methods → Results → Discussion**. Each section earns its place:
- **Introduction**: phenomenon hook → conversation/tension → question → approach → contribution, on the first 1–2 pages.
- **Theory & Hypotheses**: each subsection builds toward a numbered hypothesis with an explicit mechanism.
- **Methods**: enough detail to replicate; sample, measures, analysis, validity.
- **Results**: report tests in hypothesis order; interpret, do not just narrate the tables.
- **Discussion**: theoretical implications first, then practical, limitations, future research.
Sentence- and paragraph-level moves
- **Topic sentences**: every paragraph opens with its claim; the rest supports it.
- **Active voice**: "We theorize that…" / "Leaders allocate attention…" not "It is theorized that…".
- **De-nominalize**: "managers decide" beats "managerial decision-making occurs."
- **Define constructs once**, then use the term consistently — no synonym drift.
- **Signpost**: connect sections explicitly ("Having established X, we now…").
- **Cut hedging stacks**: one calibrated qualifier, not three.
- **Consistent terminology** for each construct, hypothesis label, and variable across text, tables, and figures.
House style (verify against the current AOM Style Guide)
- Follow AOM/APA-style conventions for citations, headings, and references as specified in the current AMJ Style Guide for Authors.
- US spelling and AOM heading hierarchy; consistent tense (past tense for what you did/found, present for established theory).
- The full manuscript main body must fit the **40-page maximum** (text + references + appendices; tables/figures excluded), **double-spaced, Times New Roman 12-pt, 1-inch margins** — so trimming targets prose, not just exhibits, and a bloated reference list eats into your page budget.
Checklist
- [ ] Contribution is clear within the first page of the introduction
- [ ] Active voice and concrete actors dominate; passive used only deliberately
- [ ] Every paragraph has a claim-first topic sentence
- [ ] Construct terms are defined once and used consistently everywhere
- [ ] Sections are signposted; the theory→method→results→discussion arc is followed
- [ ] Hedging is calibrated, not stacked
- [ ] Citations/headings/references conform to the current AMJ Style Guide
- [ ] Main body ≤ 40 pages (refs + appendices count; tables/figures do not); 12-pt TNR, double-spaced
Anti-patterns
- **Buried lede**: the contribution surfaces only in the discussion.
- **Passive fog**: "it was found that" hiding who did what.
- **Jargon walls**: dense theoretical terms with no plain-language anchor.
- **Synonym drift**: calling the same construct three different names.
- **Defensive hedging**: "may potentially possibly suggest" instead of a precise claim.
- **Tense chaos**: switching between past and present for the same event.
Output format
【Intro clarity】contribution visible on page 1? yes/no
【Voice】active-voice dominant? flagged passives: [...]
【Topic sentences】claim-first throughout? exceptions: [...]
【Terminology】construct names consistent? drift: [...]
【Structure/signposting】arc intact? gaps: [...]
【House style】AOM/APA citations & headings: pass/fix
【Length】main body vs. 40-page limit (refs+appendices incl.): ok/trim
【Next step】amj-submission
Read more
name: amj-writing-style description: Use for full-manuscript prose polish of an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — front-loading the argument, active voice, structure, and AOM house style. Polishes language and structure; it does not create the theoretical contribution (amj-contribution-framing) or fix the analysis (amj-data-analysis).
Writing Style (amj-writing-style)
When to trigger
- The argument is buried under jargon, hedging, or passive constructions
- The introduction does not make the contribution clear in its first page
- Section logic wanders; the reader cannot follow the theory → method → results → discussion arc
- Sentences are long and nominalized; the "actor doing the action" is hidden
- This is late-stage polish *after* the theory, design, and contribution are settled
The AMJ prose standard
AMJ values prose that is **rigorous yet readable**: the theoretical argument should be visible to a reader from another division. Front-load the point — say what you argue, then support it. Write in the active voice with human/organizational actors as subjects. Hedge precisely (state what the data show), not defensively (avoid stacking "may possibly suggest"). AMJ's *From the Editors* (FTE) series has devoted whole editorials to storytelling and crafting the introduction — the journal genuinely rewards a paper that "tells a story," so treat narrative arc as a substantive standard, not decoration.
Structure to enforce
Standard full structure: **Introduction → Theory & Hypotheses → Methods → Results → Discussion**. Each section earns its place:
- **Introduction**: phenomenon hook → conversation/tension → question → approach → contribution, on the first 1–2 pages.
- **Theory & Hypotheses**: each subsection builds toward a numbered hypothesis with an explicit mechanism.
- **Methods**: enough detail to replicate; sample, measures, analysis, validity.
- **Results**: report tests in hypothesis order; interpret, do not just narrate the tables.
- **Discussion**: theoretical implications first, then practical, limitations, future research.
Sentence- and paragraph-level moves
- **Topic sentences**: every paragraph opens with its claim; the rest supports it.
- **Active voice**: "We theorize that…" / "Leaders allocate attention…" not "It is theorized that…".
- **De-nominalize**: "managers decide" beats "managerial decision-making occurs."
- **Define constructs once**, then use the term consistently — no synonym drift.
- **Signpost**: connect sections explicitly ("Having established X, we now…").
- **Cut hedging stacks**: one calibrated qualifier, not three.
- **Consistent terminology** for each construct, hypothesis label, and variable across text, tables, and figures.
House style (verify against the current AOM Style Guide)
- Follow AOM/APA-style conventions for citations, headings, and references as specified in the current AMJ Style Guide for Authors.
- US spelling and AOM heading hierarchy; consistent tense (past tense for what you did/found, present for established theory).
- The full manuscript main body must fit the **40-page maximum** (text + references + appendices; tables/figures excluded), **double-spaced, Times New Roman 12-pt, 1-inch margins** — so trimming targets prose, not just exhibits, and a bloated reference list eats into your page budget.
Checklist
- [ ] Contribution is clear within the first page of the introduction
- [ ] Active voice and concrete actors dominate; passive used only deliberately
- [ ] Every paragraph has a claim-first topic sentence
- [ ] Construct terms are defined once and used consistently everywhere
- [ ] Sections are signposted; the theory→method→results→discussion arc is followed
- [ ] Hedging is calibrated, not stacked
- [ ] Citations/headings/references conform to the current AMJ Style Guide
- [ ] Main body ≤ 40 pages (refs + appendices count; tables/figures do not); 12-pt TNR, double-spaced
Anti-patterns
- **Buried lede**: the contribution surfaces only in the discussion.
- **Passive fog**: "it was found that" hiding who did what.
- **Jargon walls**: dense theoretical terms with no plain-language anchor.
- **Synonym drift**: calling the same construct three different names.
- **Defensive hedging**: "may potentially possibly suggest" instead of a precise claim.
- **Tense chaos**: switching between past and present for the same event.
Output format
【Intro clarity】contribution visible on page 1? yes/no 【Voice】active-voice dominant? flagged passives: [...] 【Topic sentences】claim-first throughout? exceptions: [...] 【Terminology】construct names consistent? drift: [...] 【Structure/signposting】arc intact? gaps: [...] 【House style】AOM/APA citations & headings: pass/fix 【Length】main body vs. 40-page limit (refs+appendices incl.): ok/trim 【Next step】amj-submission
Stanford REAP × CoPaper.AI · 由斯坦福实证方法论团队精选与维护 访问 copaper.ai 微信:CoPaper.AI 按 11 个主流学科板块覆盖 经管与商科 社会科学 人文学科 数学与物理科学 生命科学 医学与健康 工程与技术 计算机科学与 AI 体育科学 点击任一学科名可跳转到对应说明;每类下的代表子领域在正文总览中完整列出。下方封面墙按 venue 导航,完整分类见覆盖一览。 🧭 布局指南 · 📚 Skill Pack 一览 · ⚡ 如何使用 · 🧪 自动实证
Other skills on awesome-journal-skills.
- /aaai-artifact-evaluation
Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.
Open skill - /aaai-author-response
Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round
Open skill - /aaai-camera-ready
Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and
Open skill - /aaai-experiments
Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and
Open skill - /aaai-related-work
Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a
Open skill - /aaai-reproducibility
Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that
Open skill

