/amann-submission
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal or invited full review via the Manuscript Central portal — proposal-vs-invited-review route, deadlines, formatting, CV, and anonymity. Final checks; it does not draft
$ npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amann-submission --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/amann-submission
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal or invited full review via the Manuscript Central portal — proposal-vs-invited-review route, deadlines, formatting, CV, and anonymity. Final checks; it does not draft
SKILL.md
amann-submission.SKILL.mdname: amann-submission
description: Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal or invited full review via the Manuscript Central portal — proposal-vs-invited-review route, deadlines, formatting, CV, and anonymity. Final checks; it does not draft content.
Submission Preflight (amann-submission)
When to trigger
- A deadline is near — last check before uploading a proposal to Manuscript Central
- A proposal was accepted and you are submitting the invited full review
- Confirming format, CV, and anonymity requirements for the right route
- Unsure which files the portal expects for a proposal vs. a full review
Process facts (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准 — re-confirm on the AOM/Annals pages)
- **Publisher / venue.** Annals is the Academy of Management's review-of-the-field journal, published with **Taylor & Francis**. It is distinct from AMR (original theory) and AMJ (empirical). Submission is via **Manuscript Central**: `https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/aomannals`.
- **Two routes, in order.** (1) **Proposal** — the mandatory gate: **≤5 pages, single-spaced, 1-inch margins, 12pt**, with the four headings (Focus of the review / Related reviews / Review scope and process / New insights); references and visuals do not count. (2) **Invited full review** — submitted only after a proposal is accepted; typically **~50 pages** of text plus tables/figures/refs.
- **Deadlines.** Proposals are on a twice-yearly cycle — **April 1 and October 1**; not reviewed until the deadline passes; decisions **~6 weeks after** the deadline. Two issues publish per year (January and July).
- **Anonymity.** **Proposals are double-blind** (reviewed by the Associate Editors) — anonymize the proposal. The **invited full review forgoes double-blind** (read by the Associate Editor and Editor), so anonymity requirements differ between the two routes — confirm current rules on the portal.
- **CV.** A current CV may be required for the **editors' eyes only** (not seen by reviewers) — confirm at submission (待核实).
- **Style / format.** Follow the current Annals/Taylor & Francis author guidelines for manuscript format and references (house style 待核实 — confirm APA vs. other on the live page). Length, abstract, and exact formatting specifics are volatile.
- **Fees / APC.** Any submission fee or APC is **volatile — re-confirm on the official pages**; do not assert an amount.
Preflight checklist
Route & files
- [ ] Route chosen: **proposal** (≤5pp, four headings) **or** **invited full review** (after acceptance)
- [ ] Proposal uses the four required headings verbatim and meets the ≤5pp / single-spaced / 1-in / 12pt limit
- [ ] Targeting the correct April 1 / October 1 deadline
- [ ] Full review (if invited) within the expected ~50-page norm; tables/figures/refs prepared
Front matter
- [ ] Title, abstract (review-style — contribution to the field), and keywords present
- [ ] Author affiliations complete; CV prepared if required (editors-only)
Anonymity & declarations
- [ ] Proposal anonymized for double-blind review (proposal route)
- [ ] Full-review anonymity handled per current rules (it forgoes double-blind)
- [ ] Confirmed not under review elsewhere; AI not listed as an author
Volatile re-confirms
- [ ] Portal specifics, fee/APC, CV requirement, house style, anonymity — re-checked on AOM/Annals pages (检索于 2026-06)
Anti-patterns
- Uploading a full review without an accepted proposal — out of process at Annals
- A proposal that exceeds 5 pages or omits one of the four required headings
- Missing the April 1 / October 1 window because intake was assumed to be rolling
- Asserting a fee/APC or editor name from memory rather than the live page
- Failing to anonymize the proposal (it is double-blind) or mishandling the full-review anonymity difference
- A primary-paper abstract on a review submission
Output format
【Route】proposal (≤5pp, 4 headings) / invited full review (~50pp)
【Deadline】targeting April 1 / October 1? <which>
【Proposal headings】Focus / Related reviews / Scope & process / New insights present? Y/N
【Anonymity】proposal anonymized (double-blind); full-review rule confirmed? Y/N
【CV】prepared if required (editors-only)? Y/N
【Volatile re-confirms】portal / fee / style / anonymity checked on AOM page? Y/N
【Next step】submit via Manuscript Central → amann-review-process for what to expect
Supplementary resources
- [`templates/checklist.md`](templates/checklist.md) — submission self-check
- [`templates/manuscript_template.md`](templates/manuscript_template.md) — lightweight manuscript scaffold
Read more
name: amann-submission description: Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal or invited full review via the Manuscript Central portal — proposal-vs-invited-review route, deadlines, formatting, CV, and anonymity. Final checks; it does not draft content.
Submission Preflight (amann-submission)
When to trigger
- A deadline is near — last check before uploading a proposal to Manuscript Central
- A proposal was accepted and you are submitting the invited full review
- Confirming format, CV, and anonymity requirements for the right route
- Unsure which files the portal expects for a proposal vs. a full review
Process facts (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准 — re-confirm on the AOM/Annals pages)
- **Publisher / venue.** Annals is the Academy of Management's review-of-the-field journal, published with **Taylor & Francis**. It is distinct from AMR (original theory) and AMJ (empirical). Submission is via **Manuscript Central**: `https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/aomannals`.
- **Two routes, in order.** (1) **Proposal** — the mandatory gate: **≤5 pages, single-spaced, 1-inch margins, 12pt**, with the four headings (Focus of the review / Related reviews / Review scope and process / New insights); references and visuals do not count. (2) **Invited full review** — submitted only after a proposal is accepted; typically **~50 pages** of text plus tables/figures/refs.
- **Deadlines.** Proposals are on a twice-yearly cycle — **April 1 and October 1**; not reviewed until the deadline passes; decisions **~6 weeks after** the deadline. Two issues publish per year (January and July).
- **Anonymity.** **Proposals are double-blind** (reviewed by the Associate Editors) — anonymize the proposal. The **invited full review forgoes double-blind** (read by the Associate Editor and Editor), so anonymity requirements differ between the two routes — confirm current rules on the portal.
- **CV.** A current CV may be required for the **editors' eyes only** (not seen by reviewers) — confirm at submission (待核实).
- **Style / format.** Follow the current Annals/Taylor & Francis author guidelines for manuscript format and references (house style 待核实 — confirm APA vs. other on the live page). Length, abstract, and exact formatting specifics are volatile.
- **Fees / APC.** Any submission fee or APC is **volatile — re-confirm on the official pages**; do not assert an amount.
Preflight checklist
Route & files
- [ ] Route chosen: **proposal** (≤5pp, four headings) **or** **invited full review** (after acceptance)
- [ ] Proposal uses the four required headings verbatim and meets the ≤5pp / single-spaced / 1-in / 12pt limit
- [ ] Targeting the correct April 1 / October 1 deadline
- [ ] Full review (if invited) within the expected ~50-page norm; tables/figures/refs prepared
Front matter
- [ ] Title, abstract (review-style — contribution to the field), and keywords present
- [ ] Author affiliations complete; CV prepared if required (editors-only)
Anonymity & declarations
- [ ] Proposal anonymized for double-blind review (proposal route)
- [ ] Full-review anonymity handled per current rules (it forgoes double-blind)
- [ ] Confirmed not under review elsewhere; AI not listed as an author
Volatile re-confirms
- [ ] Portal specifics, fee/APC, CV requirement, house style, anonymity — re-checked on AOM/Annals pages (检索于 2026-06)
Anti-patterns
- Uploading a full review without an accepted proposal — out of process at Annals
- A proposal that exceeds 5 pages or omits one of the four required headings
- Missing the April 1 / October 1 window because intake was assumed to be rolling
- Asserting a fee/APC or editor name from memory rather than the live page
- Failing to anonymize the proposal (it is double-blind) or mishandling the full-review anonymity difference
- A primary-paper abstract on a review submission
Output format
【Route】proposal (≤5pp, 4 headings) / invited full review (~50pp) 【Deadline】targeting April 1 / October 1? <which> 【Proposal headings】Focus / Related reviews / Scope & process / New insights present? Y/N 【Anonymity】proposal anonymized (double-blind); full-review rule confirmed? Y/N 【CV】prepared if required (editors-only)? Y/N 【Volatile re-confirms】portal / fee / style / anonymity checked on AOM page? Y/N 【Next step】submit via Manuscript Central → amann-review-process for what to expect
Supplementary resources
- [`templates/checklist.md`](templates/checklist.md) — submission self-check
- [`templates/manuscript_template.md`](templates/manuscript_template.md) — lightweight manuscript scaffold
Stanford REAP × CoPaper.AI · 由斯坦福实证方法论团队精选与维护 访问 copaper.ai 微信:CoPaper.AI 按 11 个主流学科板块覆盖 经管与商科 社会科学 人文学科 数学与物理科学 生命科学 医学与健康 工程与技术 计算机科学与 AI 体育科学 点击任一学科名可跳转到对应说明;每类下的代表子领域在正文总览中完整列出。下方封面墙按 venue 导航,完整分类见覆盖一览。 🧭 布局指南 · 📚 Skill Pack 一览 · ⚡ 如何使用 · 🧪 自动实证
Other skills on awesome-journal-skills.
- /aaai-artifact-evaluation
Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.
Open skill - /aaai-author-response
Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round
Open skill - /aaai-camera-ready
Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and
Open skill - /aaai-experiments
Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and
Open skill - /aaai-related-work
Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a
Open skill - /aaai-reproducibility
Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that
Open skill

