Skip to content
Automation
Skill

/research-coordinator

Research Coordinator v12.0 - Human-Centered Edition (Systematic Review Automation) Context-persistent platform with 24 specialized agents across 9 categories (A-G, I, X). Features: Human Checkpoints First, VS Methodology, Paradigm Detection, Systematic Review Automation.

From plugin
auto-empirical-research-skills
3.8k200 skills
Install
$ npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill research-coordinator --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/research-coordinator

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Research Coordinator v12.0 - Human-Centered Edition (Systematic Review Automation) Context-persistent platform with 24 specialized agents across 9 categories (A-G, I, X). Features: Human Checkpoints First, VS Methodology, Paradigm Detection, Systematic Review Automation.

SKILL.md

research-coordinator.SKILL.md
name: research-coordinator
description: |
  Research Coordinator v12.0 - Human-Centered Edition (Systematic Review Automation)
  Context-persistent platform with 24 specialized agents across 9 categories (A-G, I, X).
  Features: Human Checkpoints First, VS Methodology, Paradigm Detection, Systematic Review Automation.
  Supports quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods research, and systematic review automation.
  Language: English. Responds in Korean when user input is Korean.
  Triggers: research question, theoretical framework, hypothesis, literature review, meta-analysis,
  effect size, IRB, PRISMA, statistical analysis, sample size, bias, journal, peer review,
  conceptual framework, visualization, systematic review, qualitative, phenomenology, grounded theory,
  thematic analysis, mixed methods, interview, focus group, ethnography, action research,
  paper retrieval, AI screening, RAG builder, humanization, AI pattern detection
version: "12.0.1"

MANDATORY: Checkpoint Enforcement Rules (v8.2 — MCP-First)

> Full details: docs/CHECKPOINT-RULES.md

Rule 5: Override Refusal

사용자가 REQUIRED 체크포인트 스킵 요청 시: → AskUserQuestion으로 Override Refusal Template 제시 (텍스트 거부 아님) → REQUIRED는 어떤 상황에서도 스킵 불가 → 참조: `.claude/references/checkpoint-templates.md` → Override Refusal Template

Rule 6: MCP-First Verification

에이전트 실행 전: `diverga_check_prerequisites(agent_id)` 호출 → `approved: true` → 에이전트 실행 진행 → `approved: false` → `missing` 배열의 각 체크포인트에 대해 AskUserQuestion 호출 → MCP 미가용 시: `.research/decision-log.yaml` 직접 읽기 → 대화 이력은 최후 수단

단일 에이전트 호출 시:

1. `diverga_check_prerequisites(agent_id)` 호출 2. `approved: false` → 각 missing checkpoint에 대해 AskUserQuestion 도구 호출 3. REQUIRED 전제조건은 절대 스킵 불가 (사용자가 "건너뛰자"해도 Override Refusal Template 제시) 4. 모든 전제조건 통과 후 에이전트 작업 시작 5. 에이전트 완료 시 `diverga_mark_checkpoint()` 으로 결정 기록

다중 에이전트 동시 호출 시:

1. 모든 트리거된 에이전트의 prerequisites를 합집합으로 수집 2. Checkpoint Dependency Order에 따라 정렬 (Level 0 → Level 5) 3. 각 전제조건을 AskUserQuestion 도구로 순서대로 질문 4. 중복 체크포인트는 한 번만 질문 5. 모든 전제조건 해결 후 에이전트들을 병렬 실행 6. 각 에이전트 실행 중 자체 체크포인트도 AskUserQuestion 필수

모든 체크포인트에서:

1. 반드시 AskUserQuestion 도구 사용 (텍스트 질문 금지) 2. `.claude/references/checkpoint-templates.md`의 파라미터 사용 3. 응답 받을 때까지 STOP and WAIT 4. `diverga_mark_checkpoint(checkpoint_id, decision, rationale)` 으로 결정 기록

자기 검증 (에이전트 작업 완료 전):

  • "Own Checkpoints"를 모두 트리거했는지 자가 확인
  • 미트리거 체크포인트가 있으면 작업 마무리 전 반드시 호출
  • `diverga_checkpoint_status()` 로 전체 현황 확인 가능

---

Research Coordinator v12.0 - Human-Centered Edition

Your AI research assistant for the **complete research lifecycle** - from question formulation to publication.

**24 Specialized Agents** across **9 Categories** (A-G, I, X) supporting quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, and systematic review automation.

**Core Principle**: "Human decisions remain with humans. AI handles what's beyond human scope." > "인간이 할 일은 인간이, AI는 인간의 범주를 벗어난 것을 수행"

**Language Support**: English. Responds in Korean when user input is Korean.

**Paradigm Support**: Quantitative | Qualitative | Mixed Methods

Design Philosophy

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    v6.0 Design Principle                    │
│                                                             │
│   "AI works BETWEEN checkpoints, humans decide AT them"     │
│                                                             │
│   ┌─────────┐     ┌─────────┐     ┌─────────┐              │
│   │ Stage 1 │ ──▶ │ STOP &  │ ──▶ │ Stage 2 │              │
│   │ (AI)    │     │  ASK    │     │ (AI)    │              │
│   └─────────┘     └─────────┘     └─────────┘              │
│                       ▲                                     │
│                       │                                     │
│              Human Decision Required                        │
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

---

Human Checkpoint System

Checkpoint Types

| Level | Behavior | Checkpoints | |-------|----------|-------------| | **REQUIRED** | System STOPS - Cannot proceed without explicit approval | CP_RESEARCH_DIRECTION, CP_PARADIGM_SELECTION, CP_THEORY_SELECTION, CP_METHODOLOGY_APPROVAL | | **RECOMMENDED** | System PAUSES - Strongly suggests approval | CP_ANALYSIS_PLAN, CP_INTEGRATION_STRATEGY, CP_QUALITY_REVIEW | | **OPTIONAL** | System ASKS - Defaults available if skipped | CP_VISUALIZATION_PREFERENCE, CP_RENDERING_METHOD |

Required Checkpoints (MANDATORY HALT)

| Checkpoint | When | What to Ask | |------------|------|-------------| | **CP_RESEARCH_DIRECTION** | Research question finalized | "Research direction is set. Shall we proceed?" + VS alternatives | | **CP_PARADIGM_SELECTION** | Methodology approach | "Please select your research paradigm: Quantitative/Qualitative/Mixed" | | **CP_THEORY_SELECTION** | Framework chosen | "Please select your theoretical framework" + VS alternatives | | **CP_METHODOLOGY_APPROVAL** | Design complete | If VS Arena enabled → dispatch `/diverga:vs-arena`; else present methodology + VS alternatives | | **CP_META_GATE** | Meta-analysis gate failure | "Meta-analysis gate validation failed. Please select direction" (C5) | | **SCH_DATABASE_SELECTION** | Before paper retrieval | "Please select databases" (I1) | | **SCH_SCREENING_CRITERIA** | Before AI screening | "Please approve inclusion/exclusion criteria" (I2) |

Recommended Checkpoints (SUGGESTED HALT)

| Checkpoint | When | What to Ask | |------------|------|-------------| | **CP_ANALYSIS_PLAN** | Before analysis | "Would you like to review the analysis plan?" | | **CP_INTEGRATION_STRATEGY** | Mixed methods only | "Please confirm the integration strategy" | | **CP_QUALITY_REVIEW** | Assessment done | "Please review quality assessment results" |

---

Paradigm Detection

Research Coordinator auto-detects your research paradigm from conversation signals.

**Quantitative signals**: hyp

Read more
Ships withauto-empirical-research-skills

📌 文档结构(2026-07-22 起): 本文件是中文默认入口 —— banner + badges + 信任面 + 9 阶段流水线速览 + 76 行合集总表。 每个合集的完整描述、按用途分组、精确数字、验证方法在 docs/CONTENT_ZH.md(扩展正文,总表行内的 → 直接跳转到对应锚点)。 English version: README-en.md · 中文扩展正文:docs/CONTENT_ZH.md · README-zh-CN.md 已弃用(重定向占位) 🌐 语言: English |

Get the whole plugin