/proofread
Run the proofreading protocol on academic writing — papers or manuscripts. Checks grammar, typos, layout issues, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants surface-level writing errors
$ npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill proofread --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/proofread
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Run the proofreading protocol on academic writing — papers or manuscripts. Checks grammar, typos, layout issues, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants surface-level writing errors
SKILL.md
proofread.SKILL.mdname: proofread
description: >-
Run the proofreading protocol on academic writing — papers or manuscripts. Checks grammar, typos, layout issues, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants surface-level writing errors found — not substantive academic critique. Triggers include: "proofread", "check for typos", "grammar check", "look for errors in my draft", "proofread all", "polish this", "check my writing", "are there any mistakes", "proofread before I send this", or when the user wants a clean-up pass rather than feedback on arguments or methods.
argument-hint: "[filename, 'all', or path to manuscript]"
allowed-tools: ["Read", "Grep", "Glob", "Write", "Task", "AskUserQuestion"]
Proofread Academic Writing
Run the mandatory proofreading protocol on papers or manuscripts. Produces a report of all issues WITHOUT editing any source files.
Steps
1. **Identify files to review:**
- If `$ARGUMENTS` is a specific filename: review that file only
- If `$ARGUMENTS` is `all`: review all files in `manuscripts/` and `Quarto/` (if it exists)
- If `$ARGUMENTS` is a file in `manuscripts/`: treat as manuscript (not slides)
- If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty or ambiguous and multiple files exist, use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Files"
- question: "Which files should I proofread?"
- multiSelect: true
- options: list up to 4 found files (label: filename, description: directory and file type). User can select multiple or choose "Other" to specify a path.
2. **For each file, launch the proofreader agent** that checks for:
**GRAMMAR:** Subject-verb agreement, articles (a/an/the), prepositions, tense consistency **TYPOS:** Misspellings, search-and-replace artifacts, duplicated words **LAYOUT ISSUES:** Overfull hbox (LaTeX slides/manuscripts), content exceeding slide boundaries (Quarto), table/column overflow in manuscripts **CONSISTENCY:** Citation format, notation, terminology, variable names matching table column names **ACADEMIC QUALITY:** Informal language, missing words, awkward constructions
3. **Produce a detailed report** for each file listing every finding with:
- Location (line number or section heading)
- Current text (what's wrong)
- Proposed fix (what it should be)
- Category and severity
4. **Save each report** to `quality_reports/`:
- For `.tex` slide files: `quality_reports/FILENAME_report.md`
- For `.qmd` slide files: `quality_reports/FILENAME_qmd_report.md`
- For manuscript files: `quality_reports/FILENAME_proofread.md`
5. **IMPORTANT: Do NOT edit any source files.** Only produce the report. Fixes are applied separately after user review (see `rules/proofreading-protocol.md`).
6. **Present summary** to the user:
- Total issues found per file
- Breakdown by category
- Most critical issues highlighted
Read more
name: proofread description: >- Run the proofreading protocol on academic writing — papers or manuscripts. Checks grammar, typos, layout issues, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants surface-level writing errors found — not substantive academic critique. Triggers include: "proofread", "check for typos", "grammar check", "look for errors in my draft", "proofread all", "polish this", "check my writing", "are there any mistakes", "proofread before I send this", or when the user wants a clean-up pass rather than feedback on arguments or methods. argument-hint: "[filename, 'all', or path to manuscript]" allowed-tools: ["Read", "Grep", "Glob", "Write", "Task", "AskUserQuestion"]
Proofread Academic Writing
Run the mandatory proofreading protocol on papers or manuscripts. Produces a report of all issues WITHOUT editing any source files.
Steps
1. **Identify files to review:**
- If `$ARGUMENTS` is a specific filename: review that file only
- If `$ARGUMENTS` is `all`: review all files in `manuscripts/` and `Quarto/` (if it exists)
- If `$ARGUMENTS` is a file in `manuscripts/`: treat as manuscript (not slides)
- If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty or ambiguous and multiple files exist, use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Files"
- question: "Which files should I proofread?"
- multiSelect: true
- options: list up to 4 found files (label: filename, description: directory and file type). User can select multiple or choose "Other" to specify a path.
2. **For each file, launch the proofreader agent** that checks for:
**GRAMMAR:** Subject-verb agreement, articles (a/an/the), prepositions, tense consistency **TYPOS:** Misspellings, search-and-replace artifacts, duplicated words **LAYOUT ISSUES:** Overfull hbox (LaTeX slides/manuscripts), content exceeding slide boundaries (Quarto), table/column overflow in manuscripts **CONSISTENCY:** Citation format, notation, terminology, variable names matching table column names **ACADEMIC QUALITY:** Informal language, missing words, awkward constructions
3. **Produce a detailed report** for each file listing every finding with:
- Location (line number or section heading)
- Current text (what's wrong)
- Proposed fix (what it should be)
- Category and severity
4. **Save each report** to `quality_reports/`:
- For `.tex` slide files: `quality_reports/FILENAME_report.md`
- For `.qmd` slide files: `quality_reports/FILENAME_qmd_report.md`
- For manuscript files: `quality_reports/FILENAME_proofread.md`
5. **IMPORTANT: Do NOT edit any source files.** Only produce the report. Fixes are applied separately after user review (see `rules/proofreading-protocol.md`).
6. **Present summary** to the user:
- Total issues found per file
- Breakdown by category
- Most critical issues highlighted
📌 文档结构(2026-07-22 起): 本文件是中文默认入口 —— banner + badges + 信任面 + 9 阶段流水线速览 + 76 行合集总表。 每个合集的完整描述、按用途分组、精确数字、验证方法在 docs/CONTENT_ZH.md(扩展正文,总表行内的 → 直接跳转到对应锚点)。 English version: README-en.md · 中文扩展正文:docs/CONTENT_ZH.md · README-zh-CN.md 已弃用(重定向占位) 🌐 语言: English |
Other skills on auto-empirical-research-skills.
- /pipeline
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest + rdrobust + econml + causalml + matplotlib/seaborn. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) —
Open skill - /pipeline
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the modern tidyverse + econometrics R ecosystem — dplyr + tidyr + haven + fixest + sandwich + lmtest + clubSandwich + AER + ivreg + did + bacondecomp + HonestDiD + eventstudyr + rdrobust + rddensity + Synth + gsynth + synthdid
Open skill - /pipeline
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Stata ecosystem — native Stata + reghdfe + ivreg2 + csdid + did_imputation + eventstudyinteract + sdid + rdrobust + rddensity + synth + synth_runner + psmatch2 + teffects + ebalance + coefplot + esttab + asdoc +
Open skill - /00-Full-empirical-analysis-skill_StatsPAI
Use when the user asks to run a full empirical / causal analysis in Python — by default in the style of an applied economics paper (AER / QJE / JPE / ReStud / AEJ) with DID / RD / IV / SCM / DML / matching, written-out estimating equation + identifying assumption, Table 1 /
Open skill - /00.1-Full-empirical-analysis-skill_Python
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest + rdrobust + econml + causalml + matplotlib/seaborn. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) —
Open skill - /00.2-Full-empirical-analysis-skill_Stata
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Stata ecosystem — native Stata + reghdfe + ivreg2 + csdid + did_imputation + eventstudyinteract + sdid + rdrobust + rddensity + synth + synth_runner + psmatch2 + teffects + ebalance + coefplot + esttab + asdoc +
Open skill

