pipeline
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest +…
Run the proofreading protocol on academic writing — papers or manuscripts. Checks grammar, typos, layout issues, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants surface-level writing errors
$ npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill proofread --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/proofreadContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Run the proofreading protocol on academic writing — papers or manuscripts. Checks grammar, typos, layout issues, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants surface-level writing errors
name: proofread description: >- Run the proofreading protocol on academic writing — papers or manuscripts. Checks grammar, typos, layout issues, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants surface-level writing errors found — not substantive academic critique. Triggers include: "proofread", "check for typos", "grammar check", "look for errors in my draft", "proofread all", "polish this", "check my writing", "are there any mistakes", "proofread before I send this", or when the user wants a clean-up pass rather than feedback on arguments or methods. argument-hint: "[filename, 'all', or path to manuscript]" allowed-tools: ["Read", "Grep", "Glob", "Write", "Task", "AskUserQuestion"]
Run the mandatory proofreading protocol on papers or manuscripts. Produces a report of all issues WITHOUT editing any source files.
1. **Identify files to review:**
2. **For each file, launch the proofreader agent** that checks for:
**GRAMMAR:** Subject-verb agreement, articles (a/an/the), prepositions, tense consistency **TYPOS:** Misspellings, search-and-replace artifacts, duplicated words **LAYOUT ISSUES:** Overfull hbox (LaTeX slides/manuscripts), content exceeding slide boundaries (Quarto), table/column overflow in manuscripts **CONSISTENCY:** Citation format, notation, terminology, variable names matching table column names **ACADEMIC QUALITY:** Informal language, missing words, awkward constructions
3. **Produce a detailed report** for each file listing every finding with:
4. **Save each report** to `quality_reports/`:
5. **IMPORTANT: Do NOT edit any source files.** Only produce the report. Fixes are applied separately after user review (see `rules/proofreading-protocol.md`).
6. **Present summary** to the user:
📌 文档结构(2026-07-22 起): 本文件是中文默认入口 —— banner + badges + 信任面 + 9 阶段流水线速览 + 76 行合集总表。 每个合集的完整描述、按用途分组、精确数字、验证方法在 docs/CONTENT_ZH.md(扩展正文,总表行内的 → 直接跳转到对应锚点)。 English version: README-en.md · 中文扩展正文:docs/CONTENT_ZH.md · README-zh-CN.md 已弃用(重定向占位) 🌐 语言: English |
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest +…
Use when the user asks to run a full empirical / causal analysis in Python — by default in the style of an applied economics paper (AER / QJE / JPE / ReStud /…
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest +…
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Stata ecosystem — native Stata + reghdfe + ivreg2 + csdid + did_imputation +…
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the modern tidyverse + econometrics R ecosystem — dplyr + tidyr + haven + fixest + sandwich + lmtest +…
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want…