pipeline
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest +…
Write comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI research. Use when writing survey papers, systematic reviews, or literature analyses on topics like segmentation, detection, classification in CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, or pathology imaging. Triggers on requests for
$ npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill medical-imaging-review --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/medical-imaging-reviewContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Write comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI research. Use when writing survey papers, systematic reviews, or literature analyses on topics like segmentation, detection, classification in CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, or pathology imaging. Triggers on requests for
name: medical-imaging-review description: > Write comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI research. Use when writing survey papers, systematic reviews, or literature analyses on topics like segmentation, detection, classification in CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, or pathology imaging. Triggers on requests for "review paper", "survey", "literature review", "综述", "systematic review", or mentions of writing academic reviews on deep learning for medical imaging. metadata: author: user version: "2.0.0" allowed-tools: - Read - Write - Edit - Glob - Grep - Bash - WebSearch - WebFetch - Task - mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__search_papers - mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__download_paper - mcp__arxiv-mcp-server__read_paper - mcp__pubmed-mcp-server__pubmed_search_articles - mcp__zotero__zotero_search_items - mcp__zotero__zotero_get_item_fulltext
<!-- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ 本文件为开源 Skill 原始文档,收录仅供学习与研究参考 ║ ║ CoPaper.AI 收集整理 | https://copaper.ai ║ ╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
来源仓库: https://github.com/luwill/research-skills 项目名称: research-skills 开源协议: MIT License 收录日期: 2026-04-02
声明: 本文件版权归原作者所有。此处收录旨在为社会科学实证研究者 提供 AI Agent Skills 的集中参考。如有侵权,请联系删除。 -->
Write comprehensive literature reviews following a systematic 7-phase workflow.
1. **Initialize project** with three core files:
2. **Follow the 7-phase workflow** (see [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md))
3. **Use domain-specific templates** (see [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md))
---
Topic sentence (main claim) → Supporting evidence (citations + data) → Analysis (critical evaluation) → Transition to next paragraph
---
Use multi-source strategy for comprehensive coverage:
| Source | Best For | Tools | |--------|----------|-------| | ArXiv | Latest DL methods, preprints | `search_papers`, `read_paper` | | PubMed | Clinical validation, peer-reviewed | `pubmed_search_articles` | | Zotero | Existing library, organized refs | `zotero_search_items` |
For MCP configuration details, see [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md).
---
# [Title]: State of the Art and Future Directions ## Key Points - [3-5 bullets summarizing main findings] ## Abstract ## 1. Introduction ### 1.1 Clinical Background ### 1.2 Technical Challenges ### 1.3 Scope and Contributions ## 2. Datasets and Evaluation Metrics ### 2.1 Public Datasets (Table 1) ### 2.2 Evaluation Metrics ## 3. Deep Learning Methods ### 3.1 [Category 1] ### 3.2 [Category 2] (Table 2: Method Comparison) ## 4. Downstream Applications ## 5. Commercial Products & Clinical Translation (Table 3) ## 6. Discussion ### 6.1 Current Limitations ### 6.2 Future Directions ## 7. Conclusion ## References
---
### 3.X [Method Category] [1-2 paragraph introduction with motivation] **[Method Name]:** [Author] et al. [ref] proposed [method], which [innovation]: - [Key component 1] - [Key component 2] Achieves Dice of X.XX on [dataset]. **Limitations:** Despite advantages, [category] methods face: (1) [limit 1]; (2) [limit 2].
---
# Data citation "...achieved Dice of 0.89 [23]" # Method citation "Gu et al. [45] proposed..." # Multi-citation "Several studies demonstrated... [12, 15, 23]" # Comparative "While [12] focused on..., [15] addressed..."
---
| File | Purpose | |------|---------| | [references/WORKFLOW.md](references/WORKFLOW.md) | Detailed 7-phase workflow | | [references/TEMPLATES.md](references/TEMPLATES.md) | CLAUDE.md and IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md templates | | [references/DOMAINS.md](references/DOMAINS.md) | Domain-specific method categories | | [references/MCP_SETUP.md](references/MCP_SETUP.md) | MCP server configuration | | [references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md](references/QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md) | Pre-submission quality checklist |
📌 文档结构(2026-07-22 起): 本文件是中文默认入口 —— banner + badges + 信任面 + 9 阶段流水线速览 + 76 行合集总表。 每个合集的完整描述、按用途分组、精确数字、验证方法在 docs/CONTENT_ZH.md(扩展正文,总表行内的 → 直接跳转到对应锚点)。 English version: README-en.md · 中文扩展正文:docs/CONTENT_ZH.md · README-zh-CN.md 已弃用(重定向占位) 🌐 语言: English |
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest +…
Use when the user asks to run a full empirical / causal analysis in Python — by default in the style of an applied economics paper (AER / QJE / JPE / ReStud /…
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest +…
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Stata ecosystem — native Stata + reghdfe + ivreg2 + csdid + did_imputation +…
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the modern tidyverse + econometrics R ecosystem — dplyr + tidyr + haven + fixest + sandwich + lmtest +…
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want…