/lfg
Full autonomous research workflow — brainstorm, plan, implement, review, and document
$ npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill lfg --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/lfg
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Full autonomous research workflow — brainstorm, plan, implement, review, and document
SKILL.md
lfg.SKILL.mdname: lfg description: Full autonomous research workflow — brainstorm, plan, implement, review, and document argument-hint: "[research task, estimation problem, or methodological improvement]" disable-model-invocation: true
Run these 5 slash commands in order. Do not do anything else. Do not stop between steps — complete every step through to the end.
1. `/workflows:brainstorm $ARGUMENTS` 2. `/workflows:plan` 3. `/workflows:work` 4. `/workflows:review` 5. `/workflows:compound`
**Hard gates:**
- Step 2 must not start until step 1 has written a file to `docs/brainstorms/`. If brainstorm produced no file, stop and report.
- Step 3 must not start until step 2 has written a file to `docs/plans/`. If plan produced no file, stop and report.
- Steps 4 and 5 run on whatever step 3 produced. A failed review does not block compound.
Start with step 1 now.
📌 文档结构（2026-07-22 起）： 本文件是中文默认入口 —— banner + badges + 信任面 + 9 阶段流水线速览 + 76 行合集总表。 每个合集的完整描述、按用途分组、精确数字、验证方法在 docs/CONTENT_ZH.md（扩展正文，总表行内的 → 直接跳转到对应锚点）。 English version: README-en.md · 中文扩展正文：docs/CONTENT_ZH.md · README-zh-CN.md 已弃用（重定向占位） 🌐 语言: English |
Other skills on auto-empirical-research-skills.
- /pipeline
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest + rdrobust + econml + causalml + matplotlib/seaborn. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) —
Open skill - /pipeline
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the modern tidyverse + econometrics R ecosystem — dplyr + tidyr + haven + fixest + sandwich + lmtest + clubSandwich + AER + ivreg + did + bacondecomp + HonestDiD + eventstudyr + rdrobust + rddensity + Synth + gsynth + synthdid
Open skill - /pipeline
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Stata ecosystem — native Stata + reghdfe + ivreg2 + csdid + did_imputation + eventstudyinteract + sdid + rdrobust + rddensity + synth + synth_runner + psmatch2 + teffects + ebalance + coefplot + esttab + asdoc +
Open skill - /00-Full-empirical-analysis-skill_StatsPAI
Use when the user asks to run a full empirical / causal analysis in Python — by default in the style of an applied economics paper (AER / QJE / JPE / ReStud / AEJ) with DID / RD / IV / SCM / DML / matching, written-out estimating equation + identifying assumption, Table 1 /
Open skill - /00.1-Full-empirical-analysis-skill_Python
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest + rdrobust + econml + causalml + matplotlib/seaborn. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) —
Open skill - /00.2-Full-empirical-analysis-skill_Stata
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Stata ecosystem — native Stata + reghdfe + ivreg2 + csdid + did_imputation + eventstudyinteract + sdid + rdrobust + rddensity + synth + synth_runner + psmatch2 + teffects + ebalance + coefplot + esttab + asdoc +
Open skill