Skip to content
Automation
Skill

/learn

Extract reusable knowledge from the current session into a persistent skill. Use when you discover something non-obvious, create a workaround, or develop a multi-step workflow that future sessions would benefit from.

From plugin
auto-empirical-research-skills
3.3k200 skills146 agents
Install
$ npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill learn --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/learn

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Extract reusable knowledge from the current session into a persistent skill. Use when you discover something non-obvious, create a workaround, or develop a multi-step workflow that future sessions would benefit from.

SKILL.md

learn.SKILL.md
name: learn
description: |
  Extract reusable knowledge from the current session into a persistent skill.
  Use when you discover something non-obvious, create a workaround, or develop
  a multi-step workflow that future sessions would benefit from.
author: Claude Code Academic Workflow
version: 1.0.0
argument-hint: "[skill-name (kebab-case)]"
allowed-tools: ["Read", "Write", "Bash", "Glob", "Grep"]

/learn — Skill Extraction Workflow

Extract non-obvious discoveries into reusable skills that persist across sessions.

When to Use This Skill

Invoke `/learn` when you encounter:

  • **Non-obvious debugging** — Investigation that took significant effort, not in docs
  • **Misleading errors** — Error message was wrong, found the real cause
  • **Workarounds** — Found a limitation with a creative solution
  • **Tool integration** — Undocumented API usage or configuration
  • **Trial-and-error** — Multiple attempts before success
  • **Repeatable workflows** — Multi-step task you'd do again
  • **User-facing automation** — Reports, checks, or processes users will request

Workflow Phases

PHASE 1: Evaluate (Self-Assessment)

Before creating a skill, answer these questions:

1. "What did I just learn that wasn't obvious before starting?" 2. "Would future-me benefit from this being documented?" 3. "Was the solution non-obvious from documentation alone?" 4. "Is this a multi-step workflow I'd repeat?"

**Continue only if YES to at least one question.**

PHASE 2: Check Existing Skills

Search for related skills to avoid duplication:

# Check project skills
ls .claude/skills/ 2>/dev/null

# Search for keywords
grep -r -i "KEYWORD" .claude/skills/ 2>/dev/null

**Outcomes:**

  • Nothing related → Create new skill (continue to Phase 3)
  • Same trigger & fix → Update existing skill (bump version)
  • Partial overlap → Update with new variant

PHASE 3: Create Skill

Create the skill file at `.claude/skills/[skill-name]/SKILL.md`:

---
name: descriptive-kebab-case-name
description: |
  [CRITICAL: Include specific triggers in the description]
  - What the skill does
  - Specific trigger conditions (exact error messages, symptoms)
  - When to use it (contexts, scenarios)
author: Claude Code Academic Workflow
version: 1.0.0
argument-hint: "[expected arguments]"  # Optional
---

# Skill Name

## Problem
[Clear problem description — what situation triggers this skill]

## Context / Trigger Conditions
[When to use — exact error messages, symptoms, scenarios]
[Be specific enough that you'd recognize it again]

## Solution
[Step-by-step solution]
[Include commands, code snippets, or workflows]

## Verification
[How to verify it worked]
[Expected output or state]

## Example
[Concrete example of the skill in action]

## References
[Documentation links, related files, or prior discussions]

PHASE 4: Quality Gates

Before finalizing, verify:

  • [ ] Description has specific trigger conditions (not vague)
  • [ ] Solution was verified to work (tested)
  • [ ] Content is specific enough to be actionable
  • [ ] Content is general enough to be reusable
  • [ ] No sensitive information (credentials, personal data)
  • [ ] Skill name is descriptive and uses kebab-case

Output

After creating the skill, report:

✓ Skill created: .claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md
  Trigger: [when to use]
  Problem: [what it solves]

Example: Creating a Skill

User discovers that a specific R package silently drops observations:

---
name: fixest-missing-covariate-handling
description: |
  Handle silent observation dropping in fixest when covariates have missing values.
  Use when: estimates seem wrong, sample size unexpectedly small, or comparing
  results between packages.
author: Claude Code Academic Workflow
version: 1.0.0
---

# fixest Missing Covariate Handling

## Problem
The fixest package silently drops observations when covariates have NA values,
which can produce unexpected results when comparing to other packages.

## Context / Trigger Conditions
- Sample size in fixest is smaller than expected
- Results differ from Stata or other R packages
- Model has covariates with potential missing values

## Solution
1. Check for NA patterns before regression:
   ```r
   summary(complete.cases(data[, covariates]))

2. Explicitly handle NA values or use `na.action` parameter 3. Document the expected sample size in comments

Verification

Compare `nobs(model)` with `nrow(data)` — difference indicates dropped obs.

References

  • fixest documentation on missing values
  • [LEARN:r-code] entry in MEMORY.md
Read more
Ships withauto-empirical-research-skills

📌 文档结构(2026-07-22 起): 本文件是中文默认入口 —— banner + badges + 信任面 + 9 阶段流水线速览 + 76 行合集总表。 每个合集的完整描述、按用途分组、精确数字、验证方法在 docs/CONTENT_ZH.md(扩展正文,总表行内的 → 直接跳转到对应锚点)。 English version: README-en.md · 中文扩展正文:docs/CONTENT_ZH.md · README-zh-CN.md 已弃用(重定向占位) 🌐 语言: English |

Get the whole plugin