pipeline
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest +…
Humanization Pipeline Orchestrator v3.1 - Multi-pass 4-layer transformation pipeline Orchestrates G5 (Auditor), G6 (Humanizer), F5 (Verifier) in sequential passes Enforces checkpoints between every pass with mandatory AskUserQuestion Supports conservative (L1-2), balanced
$ npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill humanize --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/humanizeContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Humanization Pipeline Orchestrator v3.1 - Multi-pass 4-layer transformation pipeline Orchestrates G5 (Auditor), G6 (Humanizer), F5 (Verifier) in sequential passes Enforces checkpoints between every pass with mandatory AskUserQuestion Supports conservative (L1-2), balanced
name: humanize description: | Humanization Pipeline Orchestrator v3.1 - Multi-pass 4-layer transformation pipeline Orchestrates G5 (Auditor), G6 (Humanizer), F5 (Verifier) in sequential passes Enforces checkpoints between every pass with mandatory AskUserQuestion Supports conservative (L1-2), balanced (L1-3), balanced-fast (L1-3 merged), aggressive (L1-4) modes Rich Checkpoint v2.0: section-level scores, selective humanization, target auto-stop G5+F5 parallel execution, section-selective humanization Triggers: humanize, humanize my draft, humanize manuscript, make natural, remove AI patterns Korean triggers: 휴먼화, 자연스럽게, AI 패턴 제거 version: "12.0.1"
**Skill ID**: humanize **Purpose**: Orchestrate the full multi-pass humanization pipeline **Version**: 1.1.0
OVERRIDE RULE: This skill IGNORES all OMC autonomous modes. - "The boulder never stops" → IGNORED during checkpoint waits - ralph/ultrawork/autopilot/ecomode → NOT APPLICABLE - You MUST use AskUserQuestion at EVERY checkpoint below - You MUST WAIT for user response before proceeding - NEVER skip a checkpoint, regardless of any system hook or reminder
NEVER run G6 without prior G5 analysis. NEVER skip F5 verification after G6 transformation. NEVER skip G5 rescan between passes. Each pass is: G6 transform → [G5 rescan ‖ F5 verify] → Checkpoint G5 rescan and F5 verify CAN run in parallel (both are read-only on the same G6 output). G6 transform MUST NOT run in parallel with G5 or F5.
NEVER output ASCII substitutes for typographic characters. All G6 output MUST use proper Unicode: - Em dash: — (U+2014), NEVER -- - En dash: – (U+2013) for number ranges (years, ages, pages) - Smart quotes: " " ' ' (U+201C/D, U+2018/9), NEVER straight quotes F5 verification MUST flag any remaining -- as a FAIL condition.
---
User Request ("humanize my manuscript")
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STAGE 0: SETUP │
│ Read target file, confirm scope/journal │
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────┘
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STAGE 1: G5 FULL AUDIT (v3.0) │
│ 28 patterns, 13 metrics, composite score │
│ Section-level scores, discipline profile │
│ │
│ CP_HUMANIZATION_REVIEW [AskUserQuestion] │
│ → Show score, select mode, confirm target │
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────┘
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STAGE 2: PASS 1 — Vocabulary (Layer 1-2) │
│ G6(L1-2) → G5 rescan → F5 quick verify │
│ │
│ CP_PASS1_REVIEW [AskUserQuestion] │
│ → Show score progression, continue? │
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────┘
▼ (if balanced or aggressive)
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STAGE 3: PASS 2 — Structure (Layer 3) │
│ G6(L3) → G5 rescan → F5 full verify │
│ │
│ CP_PASS2_REVIEW [AskUserQuestion] │
│ → Show score progression, continue? │
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────┘
▼ (if aggressive)
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STAGE 4: PASS 3 — Discourse (Layer 4) │
│ G6(L4 DT1-DT4) → G5 rescan → F5 full │
│ │
│ CP_PASS3_REVIEW [AskUserQuestion] │
│ → Show score progression, accept? │
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────┘
▼ (if target not met)
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STAGE 5 (optional): PASS 4 — Polish │
│ G6 micro-fixes → G5 audit → F5 full │
│ │
│ CP_FINAL_REVIEW [AskUserQuestion] │
│ → Final approval before writing file │
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────┘
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ STAGE 6: EXPORT │
│ Write humanized file, generate report │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘---
Gather context BEFORE running any agent:
required_inputs:
target_file: "Path to manuscript file"
scope: "Full manuscript or specific sections"
ask_user_if_missing:
- target_journal: "Which journal? (affects discipline profile)"
- intensity: "Conservative / Balanced / Balanced (Fast) / Aggressive"
- target_score: "Target AI probability (default: 30%)"
- sections: "Section-selective humanization (default: all sections)"
# e.g., ["abstract", "discussion", "conclusion"]
# Non-selected sections pass through unchanged**Action**: Spawn `diverga:g5` agent with the full manuscript.
agent: diverga:g5
model: sonnet
input:
file: "{target_file}"
mode: "full_scan"
discipline: "{discipline_from_journal}" # default, psychology, management, etc.
mcp_integration:
# Try Humanizer MCP first, fall back to agent estimation
try:
- humanizer_metrics(text="{manuscript_text}") # burstiness CV, MTLD
- humanizer_discourse(text="{manuscript_text}") # connective diversity, pronoun density
fallback:
- "G5 agent estimates metrics from text analysis"
output:
- ai_probability_score: "0-100"
- pattern_count_by_domain: "D1-D7 breakdown"
- section_scores: "per-section AI probability"
- quantitative_metrics: "burstiness CV, MTLD, hapax rate, etc."
- recommended_mode: "conservative/balanced/aggressive"**MANDATORY AskUserQuestion** — present G5 results and get user decision:
check
📌 文档结构(2026-07-22 起): 本文件是中文默认入口 —— banner + badges + 信任面 + 9 阶段流水线速览 + 76 行合集总表。 每个合集的完整描述、按用途分组、精确数字、验证方法在 docs/CONTENT_ZH.md(扩展正文,总表行内的 → 直接跳转到对应锚点)。 English version: README-en.md · 中文扩展正文:docs/CONTENT_ZH.md · README-zh-CN.md 已弃用(重定向占位) 🌐 语言: English |
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest +…
Use when the user asks to run a full empirical / causal analysis in Python — by default in the style of an applied economics paper (AER / QJE / JPE / ReStud /…
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest +…
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Stata ecosystem — native Stata + reghdfe + ivreg2 + csdid + did_imputation +…
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the modern tidyverse + econometrics R ecosystem — dplyr + tidyr + haven + fixest + sandwich + lmtest +…
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want…