pipeline
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest +…
VS-Enhanced Academic Style Humanizer - Transforms writing patterns to achieve authentic scholarly voice Applies transformations from G5 analysis to create natural academic prose Use when: improving AI-assisted writing quality, preparing manuscripts, enhancing scholarly voice
$ npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill g6 --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/g6Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
VS-Enhanced Academic Style Humanizer - Transforms writing patterns to achieve authentic scholarly voice Applies transformations from G5 analysis to create natural academic prose Use when: improving AI-assisted writing quality, preparing manuscripts, enhancing scholarly voice
name: g6 description: | VS-Enhanced Academic Style Humanizer - Transforms writing patterns to achieve authentic scholarly voice Applies transformations from G5 analysis to create natural academic prose Use when: improving AI-assisted writing quality, preparing manuscripts, enhancing scholarly voice Triggers: humanize, transform, make natural, improve writing quality, improve style version: "12.0.1"
`diverga_check_prerequisites("g6")` → must return `approved: true` If not approved → AskUserQuestion for each missing checkpoint (see `.claude/references/checkpoint-templates.md`)
Read `.research/decision-log.yaml` directly to verify prerequisites. Conversation history is last resort.
---
**Agent ID**: G6 **Category**: G - Communication **VS Level**: High (Creative transformation) **Tier**: Core **Icon**: ✍️ **Model Tier**: HIGH (Opus)
Transforms AI-assisted academic writing into natural, scholarly prose while preserving:
This agent takes the analysis from G5-AcademicStyleAuditor and applies appropriate transformations based on user-selected mode.
> "Humanization is not concealment—it's elevating AI-assisted writing to authentic academic expression."
The goal is to help researchers express their ideas with natural scholarly voice, improving the quality of AI-assisted drafts. Transparency about AI use remains the user's ethical responsibility.
Required:
- text: "Original text to humanize"
- analysis: "G5 pattern analysis report"
Optional:
- mode: "conservative/balanced/aggressive"
- preserve_list: ["terms to keep unchanged"]
- section_type: "abstract/methods/discussion/etc."
- target_journal: "Journal style to consider"
- sections: ["abstract", "discussion", "conclusion"] # Section-selective humanization
# Only transform specified sections; others pass through unchanged
# Default: all sections**NEVER Transform:**
**ALWAYS use Unicode typographic characters, NEVER ASCII substitutes:**
**Rule:** When generating or transforming text, always output proper Unicode punctuation. Double hyphens (`--`) must never appear in output — determine from context whether an em dash or en dash is appropriate.
**Balance:**
1. **Vocabulary substitution** (safest)
2. **Phrase restructuring** (moderate)
3. **Sentence recombination** (careful)
4. **Paragraph reorganization** (rare)
C1_significance_inflation:
strategy: "downgrade_claims"
examples:
- before: "This pivotal study revolutionizes understanding"
after: "This study advances understanding"
- before: "groundbreaking findings demonstrate"
after: "findings show"
preserve_if: "Describing genuinely landmark work with citation evidence"
C2_notability_claims:
strategy: "add_specificity"
examples:
- before: "widely cited research"
after: "research cited over 500 times"
- before: "leading experts argue"
after: "Smith and Jones (2022) argue"
require: "Specific citation or metric"
C3_superficial_ing:
strategy: "direct_statement"
examples:
- before: "highlighting the importance of X"
after: "X is important because..."
- before: "underscoring the need for Y"
after: "Y is needed to..."
note: "Convert to active, direct claims"
C4_promotional_language:
strategy: "neutralize"
examples:
- before: "cutting-edge methodology"
after: "current methodology"
- before: "groundbreaking approach"
after: "novel approach"
preserve_if: "Direct quote or genuinely unprecedented"
C5_vague_attributions:
strategy: "add_citation_or_remove"
examples:
- before: "Studies have shown that..."
after: "[Citation] found that..."
- before: "Experts agree that..."
after: "[Sp📌 文档结构(2026-07-22 起): 本文件是中文默认入口 —— banner + badges + 信任面 + 9 阶段流水线速览 + 76 行合集总表。 每个合集的完整描述、按用途分组、精确数字、验证方法在 docs/CONTENT_ZH.md(扩展正文,总表行内的 → 直接跳转到对应锚点)。 English version: README-en.md · 中文扩展正文:docs/CONTENT_ZH.md · README-zh-CN.md 已弃用(重定向占位) 🌐 语言: English |
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest +…
Use when the user asks to run a full empirical / causal analysis in Python — by default in the style of an applied economics paper (AER / QJE / JPE / ReStud /…
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Python econometric stack — pandas + numpy + scipy + statsmodels + linearmodels + pyfixest +…
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Stata ecosystem — native Stata + reghdfe + ivreg2 + csdid + did_imputation +…
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the modern tidyverse + econometrics R ecosystem — dplyr + tidyr + haven + fixest + sandwich + lmtest +…
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want…