Skip to content
Automation
Skill

/devils-advocate

Challenge slide design with 5-7 pedagogical questions. Checks ordering, prerequisites, and cognitive load.

From plugin
auto-empirical-research-skills
3.3k200 skills146 agents
Install
$ npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill devils-advocate --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/devils-advocate

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Challenge slide design with 5-7 pedagogical questions. Checks ordering, prerequisites, and cognitive load.

SKILL.md

devils-advocate.SKILL.md
name: devils-advocate
description: Challenge slide design with 5-7 pedagogical questions. Checks ordering, prerequisites, and cognitive load.
argument-hint: "[Lecture filename]"
allowed-tools: ["Read", "Grep", "Glob"]

Devil's Advocate Review

Critically examine a slide deck and challenge its design with 5-7 specific pedagogical questions.

**Philosophy:** "We arrive at the best possible presentation through active dialogue."

---

Setup

1. **Read the target file** (the lecture being challenged) 2. **Read the knowledge base** in `.claude/rules/` for notation conventions and narrative arc 3. If applicable, **read adjacent lectures** for narrative continuity

---

Challenge Categories

Generate 5-7 challenges from these categories:

1. Ordering Challenges

> "Could students understand this better if we showed X before Y?"

2. Prerequisite Challenges

> "Do students have the background for this notation at this point?"

3. Gap Challenges

> "Should we include an intuitive example before this formal proof?"

4. Alternative Presentation Challenges

> "Here are 2 other ways to visualize/present this concept."

5. Notation Conflict Challenges

> "This symbol conflicts with earlier lecture usage."

6. Cognitive Load Challenges

> "This slide has too many new symbols. Can we split?"

7. Book Vision Challenges

> "If this becomes a book chapter, does this section stand alone?"

---

Output Format

# Devil's Advocate: [Lecture Title]

## Challenges

### Challenge 1: [Category] — [Short title]
**Question:** [The specific pedagogical question]
**Why it matters:** [What could go wrong]
**Suggested resolution:** [Specific action]
**Slides affected:** [Numbers or titles]
**Severity:** [High / Medium / Low]

[Repeat for 5-7 challenges]

## Summary Verdict
**Strengths:** [2-3 things done well]
**Critical changes:** [0-2 changes before teaching]
**Suggested improvements:** [2-3 nice-to-have changes]

---

Principles

  • **Be specific:** Reference exact slides and notation
  • **Be constructive:** Every challenge has a suggested resolution
  • **Be honest:** If the deck is good, say so
  • **Prioritize:** Notation conflicts > missed metaphors
  • **Think like a student:** Where do they get lost?
Read more
Ships withauto-empirical-research-skills

📌 文档结构(2026-07-22 起): 本文件是中文默认入口 —— banner + badges + 信任面 + 9 阶段流水线速览 + 76 行合集总表。 每个合集的完整描述、按用途分组、精确数字、验证方法在 docs/CONTENT_ZH.md(扩展正文,总表行内的 → 直接跳转到对应锚点)。 English version: README-en.md · 中文扩展正文:docs/CONTENT_ZH.md · README-zh-CN.md 已弃用(重定向占位) 🌐 语言: English |

Get the whole plugin