Skip to content
Automation
Skill

/causal-inference-r

Run IV, DiD, and RDD analyses in R with proper diagnostics. Use when implementing causal inference methods, event studies, or treatment effect estimation.

From plugin
auto-empirical-research-skills
3.3k200 skills146 agents
Install
$ npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill causal-inference-r --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/causal-inference-r

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Run IV, DiD, and RDD analyses in R with proper diagnostics. Use when implementing causal inference methods, event studies, or treatment effect estimation.

SKILL.md

causal-inference-r.SKILL.md
name: causal-inference-r
description: Run IV, DiD, and RDD analyses in R with proper diagnostics. Use when implementing causal inference methods, event studies, or treatment effect estimation.

R Econometrics

Purpose

This skill helps economists run rigorous econometric analyses in R, including Instrumental Variables (IV), Difference-in-Differences (DiD), and Regression Discontinuity Design (RDD). It generates publication-ready code with proper diagnostics and robust standard errors.

When to Use

  • Running causal inference analyses
  • Estimating treatment effects with panel data
  • Creating publication-ready regression tables
  • Implementing modern econometric methods (two-way fixed effects, event studies)

Instructions

Step 1: Understand the Research Design

Before generating code, ask the user: 1. What is your identification strategy? (IV, DiD, RDD, or simple regression) 2. What is the unit of observation? (individual, firm, country-year, etc.) 3. What fixed effects do you need? (entity, time, two-way) 4. How should standard errors be clustered?

Step 2: Generate Analysis Code

Based on the research design, generate R code that:

1. **Uses the `fixest` package** - Modern, fast, and feature-rich for panel data 2. **Includes proper diagnostics:**

  • For IV: First-stage F-statistics, weak instrument tests
  • For DiD: Parallel trends visualization, event study plots
  • For RDD: Bandwidth selection, density tests

3. **Uses robust/clustered standard errors** appropriate for the data structure 4. **Creates publication-ready output** using `modelsummary` or `etable`

Step 3: Structure the Output

Always include:

# 1. Setup and packages
# 2. Data loading and preparation
# 3. Descriptive statistics
# 4. Main specification
# 5. Robustness checks
# 6. Visualization
# 7. Export results

Step 4: Add Documentation

Include comments explaining:

  • Why each specification choice was made
  • Interpretation of key coefficients
  • Limitations and assumptions

Example Prompts

  • "Run a DiD analysis with state and year fixed effects, clustering at the state level"
  • "Estimate the effect of X on Y using Z as an instrument"
  • "Create an event study plot showing treatment effects by year"
  • "Run a sharp RDD with optimal bandwidth selection"

Example Output

# ============================================
# Difference-in-Differences Analysis
# ============================================

# Setup
library(tidyverse)
library(fixest)
library(modelsummary)

# Load data
df <- read_csv("data.csv")

# Prepare treatment variable
df <- df %>%
  mutate(
    post = year >= treatment_year,
    treated = state %in% treatment_states,
    treat_post = treated * post
  )

# ----------------------------------------
# Main DiD Specification
# ----------------------------------------

# Two-way fixed effects
did_model <- feols(
  outcome ~ treat_post | state + year,
  data = df,
  cluster = ~state
)

# View results
summary(did_model)

# ----------------------------------------
# Event Study
# ----------------------------------------

# Create relative time variable
df <- df %>%
  mutate(rel_time = year - treatment_year)

# Event study regression
event_study <- feols(
  outcome ~ i(rel_time, treated, ref = -1) | state + year,
  data = df,
  cluster = ~state
)

# Plot coefficients
iplot(event_study, 
      main = "Event Study: Effect on Outcome",
      xlab = "Years Relative to Treatment")

# ----------------------------------------
# Robustness: Alternative Specifications
# ----------------------------------------

# Different clustering
did_robust <- feols(
  outcome ~ treat_post | state + year,
  data = df,
  cluster = ~state + year  # Two-way clustering
)

# ----------------------------------------
# Export Results
# ----------------------------------------

modelsummary(
  list("Main" = did_model, "Two-way Cluster" = did_robust),
  stars = c('*' = 0.1, '**' = 0.05, '***' = 0.01),
  output = "results/did_table.tex"
)

Requirements

Software

  • R 4.0+

Packages

  • `fixest` - Fast fixed effects estimation
  • `modelsummary` - Publication-ready tables
  • `tidyverse` - Data manipulation
  • `ggplot2` - Visualization

Install with:

install.packages(c("fixest", "modelsummary", "tidyverse"))

Best Practices

1. **Always cluster standard errors** at the level of treatment assignment 2. **Run pre-trend tests** for DiD designs 3. **Report first-stage F-statistics** for IV (should be > 10) 4. **Use `feols` over `lm`** for panel data (faster and more features) 5. **Document all specification choices** in your code comments

Common Pitfalls

  • ❌ Not clustering standard errors at the right level
  • ❌ Ignoring weak instruments in IV estimation
  • ❌ Using TWFE with staggered treatment timing (use `did` or `sunab()` instead)
  • ❌ Not reporting robustness checks

References

  • [fixest documentation](https://lrberge.github.io/fixest/)
  • [Cunningham (2021) Causal Inference: The Mixtape](https://mixtape.scunning.com/)
  • [Angrist & Pischke (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics](https://www.mostlyharmlesseconometrics.com/)

Changelog

v1.0.0

  • Initial release with IV, DiD, RDD support
Read more
Ships withauto-empirical-research-skills

📌 文档结构(2026-07-22 起): 本文件是中文默认入口 —— banner + badges + 信任面 + 9 阶段流水线速览 + 76 行合集总表。 每个合集的完整描述、按用途分组、精确数字、验证方法在 docs/CONTENT_ZH.md(扩展正文,总表行内的 → 直接跳转到对应锚点)。 English version: README-en.md · 中文扩展正文:docs/CONTENT_ZH.md · README-zh-CN.md 已弃用(重定向占位) 🌐 语言: English |

Get the whole plugin