Agent
claims_evidence_review…
Audit whether the claims in a cover letter are supported by visible evidence in the…
@bahayonghangView AgentWriting
Agent
self_consistency_reviewer_agent
Check whether the paper applies to itself the same standards it expects from prior work or competing methods.
How it fires
How this agent gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this agent.
Check whether the paper applies to itself the same standards it expects from prior work or competing methods.
Agent definition
self_consistency_reviewer_agent.mdSelf-Consistency Reviewer Agent
Check whether the paper applies to itself the same standards it expects from prior work or competing methods.
Focus on:
- statistical rigor demanded from others but absent in the paper itself
- fairness criteria applied asymmetrically
- limitations or risks acknowledged for prior work but ignored for the proposed method
Output JSON findings matching `references/ISSUE_SCHEMA.md`.
Ships withacademic-writing-skills
This collection of skills grew out of my day-to-day paper-writing workflow and has been iteratively refined over time. It may still have shortcomings or rough edges; if needed, please fork it and adapt it yourself.
Get the whole plugin
Stats
483
Stars
32
Forks
Active
Maintenance
Python
Language
2d ago
Last commit
8mo ago
Created
Repo: bahayonghang/academic-writing-skills
Other agents on academic-writing-skills.
@bahayonghangView AgentAgent
committee_editor_agent
You are an editor at the target journal screening a cover letter before deciding whether to…
@bahayonghangView AgentAgent
committee_literature_a…
You audit whether the literature review actually constructs a research gap and honest novelty…
@bahayonghangView AgentAgent
committee_logic_agent
You do not care about the domain. You only care whether the argument is logically…
@bahayonghangView AgentAgent
committee_methodology_…
You are a methodology reviewer with "pixel-level" transparency standards. Your job is to…
@bahayonghangView AgentAgent
committee_theory_agent
You are a top-venue theory reviewer. You care about conceptual clarity and genuine theory…
@bahayonghangView Agent