claims_evidence_review…
Audit whether the claims in a cover letter are supported by visible evidence in the…
Review one major section or logical section group in depth.
How it fires
How this agent gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this agent.
Review one major section or logical section group in depth.
Review one major section or logical section group in depth.
`P-ARC-CLOSE` (wrap-up / closing), `P-ARC-LINK` (adjacent-paragraph interface), and `P-ARC-FLAT` (body expansion); missing transition words alone are not a logical break
and apply the permissions defined in `academic-writing-skills/paper-audit/references/SUBSECTION_CONTEXT_PROTOCOL.md`
(`CF-DISCLAIM` / `CF-CAVEAT-POS`) and, in a conclusion, a closing paragraph that ends on a negative judgment with no direction (`CF-CLOSE-NEG`); report as `presentation`, propose reordering only, never delete the caveat
Write findings as a JSON array matching `references/ISSUE_SCHEMA.md`.
This collection of skills grew out of my day-to-day paper-writing workflow and has been iteratively refined over time. It may still have shortcomings or rough edges; if needed, please fork it and adapt it yourself.
Repo: bahayonghang/academic-writing-skills
Audit whether the claims in a cover letter are supported by visible evidence in the…
You are an editor at the target journal screening a cover letter before deciding whether to…
You audit whether the literature review actually constructs a research gap and honest novelty…
You do not care about the domain. You only care whether the argument is logically…
You are a methodology reviewer with "pixel-level" transparency standards. Your job is to…
You are a top-venue theory reviewer. You care about conceptual clarity and genuine theory…