verify
Verify changes to the claude-for-msft-365-install admin scripts and commands by driving them against an isolated fake $HOME.
Scan the portfolio for the highest-leverage AI opportunities and rank where to deploy operating-partner time. Ingests quarterly updates and financials across multiple portfolio companies, identifies quick wins at each, and stacks them into a single ranked action list. Use during
$ npx -y skills add anthropics/financial-services --skill ai-readiness --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/ai-readinessContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Scan the portfolio for the highest-leverage AI opportunities and rank where to deploy operating-partner time. Ingests quarterly updates and financials across multiple portfolio companies, identifies quick wins at each, and stacks them into a single ranked action list. Use during
name: ai-readiness description: Scan the portfolio for the highest-leverage AI opportunities and rank where to deploy operating-partner time. Ingests quarterly updates and financials across multiple portfolio companies, identifies quick wins at each, and stacks them into a single ranked action list. Use during quarterly portfolio reviews, annual planning, or when deciding which companies get AI investment first. Triggers on "AI readiness", "AI opportunity scan", "where should we deploy AI", "AI across the portfolio", "AI quick wins", or "which portcos are ready for AI".
First, ask the user where the portfolio materials live. Don't assume — offer the options:
Once connected, pull quarterly updates, board decks, and financials for the portfolio (or a subset). For each company, extract: sector, revenue, headcount by function, tech stack mentioned, and any AI/automation initiatives already in flight.
If the user provides a single company, still run the scan but skip the cross-portfolio ranking.
Ask up front if not obvious from materials:
For each company, answer three gate questions. All three yes → **Go**. Any no → **Wait** with a note on what unblocks it.
1. **Is the data there?** Can they produce a clean input for the use case — customer list, invoice feed, contract repository — without a 6-month data project first? 2. **Is there an owner?** Someone on the management team who will drive this, not a sponsor who will "support" it. 3. **Can we pilot in 30 days?** One team, one workflow, off-the-shelf tooling. If the answer starts with "first we'd need to...", it's not a quick win.
Then identify the top 2-3 leverage points. Look for these patterns in the cost structure and operations:
**Back Office (usually fastest to pilot)**
**Revenue / Front Office**
**Operations (sector-dependent)**
For each leverage point, capture in one line: what it replaces, FTE-hours/week saved (assume 30-50%, not 100%), and whether it's buy-off-the-shelf or needs a light build.
Stack every leverage point from every company into one list. Rank by:
1. **Dollar impact** — annualized EBITDA contribution (cost out + revenue lift, net of tool cost) 2. **Speed to value** — months to first measurable result 3. **Probability** — discount for data quality, change management risk, management team capability
Tiebreaker: favor opportunities with <18 months of hold period remaining — those need to move now or not at all.
Output the stack:
| Rank | Company | Opportunity | Est. EBITDA ($) | Months to Value | Gate | First Step | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | 1 | | | | | Go | | | 2 | | | | | Go | | | 3 | | | | | Wait — [blocker] | |
The highest-leverage move in a portfolio is running one successful play at multiple companies. Scan for:
List each replay with the lead company (who proves it) and follower companies (who copy it).
One page for the operating partner, structured for a portfolio review:
1. **Top 5 across the portfolio** — the ranked table from Step 3, with owner and 30-day first step 2. **Replays** — 2-3 playbooks that hit multiple companies at once 3. **Go / Wait by company** — one line each; for Waits, what unblocks them 4. **What we're NOT doing** — the opportunities that looked good on paper but failed a gate; saves the operating partner from relitigating them every quarter 5. **Aggregate EBITDA contribution** — total portfolio-wide AI opportunity, split Year 1 quick wins vs. Years 2-3 scale
Reference agents, skills, and data connectors for the financial-services workflows we see most — investment banking, equity research, private equity, and wealth management.
Verify changes to the claude-for-msft-365-install admin scripts and commands by driving them against an isolated fake $HOME.
Audit a spreadsheet for formula accuracy, errors, and common mistakes. Scopes to a selected range, a single sheet, or the entire model (including…
Create professional equity research earnings update reports (8-12 pages, 3,000-5,000 words) analyzing quarterly results for companies already under coverage.…
Build pre-earnings analysis with estimate models, scenario frameworks, and key metrics to watch. Use before a company reports quarterly earnings to prepare…
Update financial models with new data — quarterly earnings, management guidance, macro changes, or revised assumptions. Adjusts estimates, recalculates…
Draft concise morning meeting notes summarizing overnight developments, trade ideas, and key events for coverage stocks. Designed for the 7am morning meeting…