Skip to content
AI & Agents
Command

/cs-workflow-build

/cs-workflow-build <task-description> — Design and write a deterministic Claude Code workflow (.js). Opens with intake questions, infers-and-proposes a topology when the request is vague, then scaffolds + validates the file. Use when building or running a custom Claude Code

From plugin
claude-skills
30k169 skills127 agents169 commands2 MCP
$ npx -y skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --agent claude-code

Command definition

cs-workflow-build.md
disable-model-invocation: true
name: "cs-workflow-build"
description: "/cs-workflow-build <task-description> — Design and write a deterministic Claude Code workflow (.js). Opens with intake questions, infers-and-proposes a topology when the request is vague, then scaffolds + validates the file. Use when building or running a custom Claude Code workflow."

/cs-workflow-build — Workflow Architect Intake

**Command:** `/cs-workflow-build <task-description>`

Designs a deterministic multi-agent workflow for Claude Code's Workflow tool. Always opens with intake; never writes a file before the topology is confirmed.

When to Run

  • Building a new `.claude/workflows/*.js` file
  • Automating a repeatable, multi-step task across fresh-context sub-agents
  • Deciding whether a task even warrants a workflow (vs. a single agent or a skill)

Step 1 — Intake (always first)

Ask the opening question set. Lead with #1.

1. What repeatable, multi-step task do you want to automate? 2. What is the one unit of work a single sub-agent does once? 3. How many units — a known list, or discovered by looping? 4. Do later steps need *all* prior results at once, or can each item flow on its own? 5. Does any step need structured data back (a verdict, a list, scores)? 6. Roughly how deep / how many tokens?

Step 2 — If the user is vague, infer and propose (don't loop on questions)

python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/workflow-builder/scripts/workflow_intake.py --task "<their request>" \
  --units unknown --stages unknown --needs-all unknown --structured unknown

Present the result as "here's what I'd build and why": recommended topology (+ runner-up), per-stage model picks, a budget guard, and the rationale for each choice. Then ask only "what should I change?"

Step 3 — Confirm the shape, then scaffold

python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/workflow-builder/scripts/scaffold_workflow.py \
  --topology <fan-out|pipeline|barrier|loop|judge-panel> --name <name> --description "..." \
  > .claude/workflows/<name>.js

Step 4 — Validate before running

python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/workflow-builder/scripts/validate_workflow.py .claude/workflows/<name>.js

Fix every FAIL. WARNs need a one-line justification.

Step 5 — Run

export CLAUDE_CODE_WORKFLOWS=1   # the feature is off by default
# Save under .claude/workflows/, then launch + monitor via /workflows.
# P = pause/resume, X = skip a sub-agent. Failed agents retry automatically.

The Hard Rules (validator enforces)

1. `meta` is a pure literal and the first statement — no variables, spreads, template strings, or calls. 2. No `Date.now()`, `Math.random()`, or argless `new Date()` — they break resume. 3. No filesystem / Node APIs in the orchestrator — that work goes inside `agent()`. 4. `parallel()` takes thunks (`() => agent(...)`); default to `pipeline()` unless a stage needs the whole prior set. 5. Guard every open-ended loop with a counter or `budget.remaining()`. 6. `results.filter(Boolean)` before using parallel/pipeline output.

Output Format

# Workflow Build: <name>
## The Decision
[intake | recommend | scaffold | validate | run]
## Recommended Topology
[fan-out | pipeline | barrier | loop | judge-panel] — why
## Model Plan
[per-stage model + reason]
## Validator Verdict
🟢 PASS | 🟡 WARN (justified) | 🔴 FAIL (with line numbers)
## Next Steps
[3 concrete actions]

Related

  • Agent: [`cs-workflow-architect`](../agents/cs-workflow-architect.md)
  • Skill: [`workflow-builder`](../skills/workflow-builder/SKILL.md)
  • Adjacent: `/cs-write-a-skill` (authoring skills, not workflows)

---

**Version:** 1.0.0

Read more
@alirezarezvani
Ships withclaude-skills

411 production-ready skills for Claude Code and 12 other coding agents, covering engineering, product, marketing, compliance, finance and the C-suite. We test whether each skill loads when you ask in plain words, and publish the results.

30k200 skills127 agents2 MCP
Get the whole plugin

Stars on GitHub

Momentum

stars in total
29.6k
Star history of alirezarezvani/claude-skills on GitHub, a chart by star-history.com

Other commands on claude-skills.

focused-fix

focused-fix

Command

Deep-dive feature repair — systematically fix an entire feature/module across all its files and dependencies. Usage: /focused-fix…

plugin-audit

plugin-audit

Command

Comprehensive audit pipeline for skills, plugins, agents, and commands. Validates structure, quality, security, marketplace…

More commands from other plugins.

devbox-entrypoint

devbox-entrypoint

Command

Context: runloop resumes a devbox by re-running the same entrypoint script, which invokes `cn serve --id <agentId> ...`. Because…

@continuedev@continuedevInstall Command
c

c

Command

Shortcut for "continue working" — pick the work in flight back up exactly where it stopped and keep going until it is done or…

lifeos2w20k
@danielmiessler@danielmiesslerInstall Command
sidecar

sidecar

Command

Spawn a read-only sidecar subagent to investigate something in this checkout without editing files, moving branches, or touching…

@builderio@builderioInstall Command