00-academic-router
Use when the user wants help with academic papers or citations but it's unclear which specific workflow fits — reviewing a paper, checking a BibTeX file for…
Benchmark LLM reference recommendation capabilities by verifying every cited paper against Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP. Measures hallucination rate, per-field accuracy (title/author/year/DOI), discipline breakdown, and year constraint compliance. Supports tool-augmented
$ npx -y skills add agentscope-ai/OpenJudge --skill 03-ref-hallucination-arena --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/03-ref-hallucination-arenaContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Benchmark LLM reference recommendation capabilities by verifying every cited paper against Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP. Measures hallucination rate, per-field accuracy (title/author/year/DOI), discipline breakdown, and year constraint compliance. Supports tool-augmented
name: 03-ref-hallucination-arena description: > Benchmark LLM reference recommendation capabilities by verifying every cited paper against Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP. Measures hallucination rate, per-field accuracy (title/author/year/DOI), discipline breakdown, and year constraint compliance. Supports tool-augmented (ReAct + web search) mode. Use when the user asks to evaluate, benchmark, or compare models on academic reference hallucination, literature recommendation quality, or citation accuracy.
Evaluate how accurately LLMs recommend real academic references using the OpenJudge `RefArenaPipeline`:
1. **Load queries** — from JSON/JSONL dataset 2. **Collect responses** — BibTeX-formatted references from target models 3. **Extract references** — parse BibTeX entries from model output 4. **Verify references** — cross-check against Crossref / PubMed / arXiv / DBLP 5. **Score & rank** — compute verification rate, per-field accuracy, discipline breakdown 6. **Generate report** — Markdown report + visualization charts
# Install OpenJudge pip install py-openjudge # Extra dependency for ref_hallucination_arena (chart generation) pip install matplotlib
| Info | Required? | Notes | |------|-----------|-------| | Config YAML path | Yes | Defines endpoints, dataset, verification settings | | Dataset path | Yes | JSON/JSONL file with queries (can be set in config) | | API keys | Yes | Env vars: `OPENAI_API_KEY`, `DASHSCOPE_API_KEY`, etc. | | CrossRef email | No | Improves API rate limits for verification | | PubMed API key | No | Improves PubMed rate limits | | Output directory | No | Default: `./evaluation_results/ref_hallucination_arena` | | Report language | No | `"en"` (default) or `"zh"` | | Tavily API key | No | Required only if using tool-augmented mode |
# Run evaluation with config file python -m cookbooks.ref_hallucination_arena --config config.yaml --save # Resume from checkpoint (default behavior) python -m cookbooks.ref_hallucination_arena --config config.yaml --save # Start fresh, ignore checkpoint python -m cookbooks.ref_hallucination_arena --config config.yaml --fresh --save # Override output directory python -m cookbooks.ref_hallucination_arena --config config.yaml \ --output_dir ./my_results --save
import asyncio
from cookbooks.ref_hallucination_arena.pipeline import RefArenaPipeline
async def main():
pipeline = RefArenaPipeline.from_config("config.yaml")
result = await pipeline.evaluate()
for rank, (model, score) in enumerate(result.rankings, 1):
print(f"{rank}. {model}: {score:.1%}")
asyncio.run(main())| Flag | Default | Description | |------|---------|-------------| | `--config` | — | Path to YAML configuration file (required) | | `--output_dir` | config value | Override output directory | | `--save` | `False` | Save results to file | | `--fresh` | `False` | Start fresh, ignore checkpoint |
task:
description: "Evaluate LLM reference recommendation capabilities"
dataset:
path: "./data/queries.json"
target_endpoints:
model_a:
base_url: "https://api.openai.com/v1"
api_key: "${OPENAI_API_KEY}"
model: "gpt-4"
system_prompt: "You are an academic literature recommendation expert. Recommend {num_refs} real papers in BibTeX format. Only recommend papers you are confident actually exist."
model_b:
base_url: "https://dashscope.aliyuncs.com/compatible-mode/v1"
api_key: "${DASHSCOPE_API_KEY}"
model: "qwen3-max"
system_prompt: "You are an academic literature recommendation expert. Recommend {num_refs} real papers in BibTeX format. Only recommend papers you are confident actually exist."| Field | Required | Description | |-------|----------|-------------| | `description` | Yes | Evaluation task description | | `scenario` | No | Usage scenario |
| Field | Default | Description | |-------|---------|-------------| | `path` | — | Path to JSON/JSONL dataset file (required) | | `shuffle` | `false` | Shuffle queries before evaluation | | `max_queries` | `null` | Max queries to use (`null` = all) |
| Field | Default | Description | |-------|---------|-------------| | `base_url` | — | API base URL (required) | | `api_key` | — | API key, supports `${ENV_VAR}` (required) | | `model` | — | Model name (required) | | `system_prompt` | built-in | System prompt; use `{num_refs}` placeholder | | `max_concurrency` | `5` | Max concurrent requests for this endpoint | | `extra_params` | — | Extra API request params (e.g. `temperature`) | | `tool_config.enabled` | `false` | Enable ReAct agent with Tavily web search | | `tool_config.tavily_api_key` | env var | Tavily API key | | `tool_config.max_iterations` | `10` | Max ReAct iterations (1–30) | | `tool_config.search_depth` | `"advanced"` | `"basic"` or `"advanced"` |
| Field | Default | Description | |-------|---------|-------------| | `crossref_mailto` | — | Email for Crossref polite pool | | `pubmed_api_key` | — | PubMed API key | | `max_workers` | `10` | Concurrent verification threads (1–50) | | `timeout` | `30` | Per-request timeout in seconds | | `verified_threshold` | `0.7` | Min composite score to count as VERIFIED |
| Field | Default | Description | |-------|---------|-------------| | `timeout` | `120` | Model API request timeout in seconds | | `retry_times` | `3` | Number of retry attempts |
| Field | Default | Description | |-------|---------|-------------| | `output_dir` | `./evaluation_results/ref_hallucination_arena` | Output directory | | `save_queries` | `true` | Save loaded queries | | `save_responses` | `true` | Save model responses | | `save_details` | `true` | Save verification details |
OpenJudge: A Unified Framework for Holistic Evaluation and Quality Rewards
Use when the user wants help with academic papers or citations but it's unclear which specific workflow fits — reviewing a paper, checking a BibTeX file for…
Review academic papers for correctness, quality, and novelty using OpenJudge's multi-stage pipeline. Supports PDF files and LaTeX source packages…
Verify a BibTeX file for hallucinated or fabricated references by cross-checking every entry against CrossRef, arXiv, and DBLP. Reports each reference as…
Use when the user wants to compare or benchmark multiple LLMs/agents arena-style but it's unclear which specific workflow fits — a general-purpose win-rate…
Automatically evaluate and compare multiple AI models or agents without pre-existing test data. Generates test queries from a task description, collects…
Benchmark LLM reference recommendation capabilities by verifying every cited paper against Crossref, PubMed, arXiv, and DBLP. Measures hallucination rate,…