Skip to content

/core-web-vitals

Optimize Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) for better page experience using field and lab evidence. Use when asked to "improve Core Web Vitals", "fix LCP", "reduce CLS", "optimize INP", "page experience optimization", or "fix layout shifts".

From plugin
web-quality-skills
3k6 skills

Claude Code

$ npx -y skills add addyosmani/web-quality-skills --skill core-web-vitals --agent claude-code

SKILL.md

core-web-vitals.SKILL.md
name: core-web-vitals
description: Optimize Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) for better page experience using field and lab evidence. Use when asked to "improve Core Web Vitals", "fix LCP", "reduce CLS", "optimize INP", "page experience optimization", or "fix layout shifts".
license: MIT
metadata:
  author: web-quality-skills
  version: "2.0"

Core Web Vitals optimization

Targeted optimization for the three Core Web Vitals using field data to identify user impact and browser traces to diagnose causes.

Measure before optimizing

When a runnable URL is available, read [the performance measurement workflow](../performance/references/MEASUREMENT.md). Prefer this sequence:

1. Check page-level CrUX p75 data, with a clearly labeled origin fallback when page data is unavailable. 2. Record a browser performance trace under stated conditions. With Chrome DevTools MCP, trace summaries can include CrUX alongside the observed lab metrics. 3. Analyze only the insights associated with the failing metric, then inspect the implicated code and resources. 4. Re-run equivalent lab measurements after the fix. Do not claim an immediate field improvement; CrUX and first-party RUM need new user visits.

If only source code is available, identify likely causes but do not claim that LCP, INP, or CLS is failing without runtime evidence.

The three metrics

| Metric | Measures | Good | Needs work | Poor | |--------|----------|------|------------|------| | **LCP** | Loading | ≤ 2.5s | 2.5s – 4s | > 4s | | **INP** | Interactivity | ≤ 200ms | 200ms – 500ms | > 500ms | | **CLS** | Visual Stability | ≤ 0.1 | 0.1 – 0.25 | > 0.25 |

Google measures at the **75th percentile** — 75% of page visits must meet "Good" thresholds.

---

LCP: Largest Contentful Paint

LCP measures when the largest visible content element renders. Usually this is:

  • Hero image or video
  • Large text block
  • Background image
  • `<svg>` element

Common LCP issues

**1. Slow server response (TTFB > 800ms)**

Fix: CDN, caching, optimized backend, edge rendering

**2. Render-blocking resources**

<!-- ❌ Blocks rendering -->
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/all-styles.css">

<!-- ✅ Critical CSS inlined, rest deferred -->
<style>/* Critical above-fold CSS */</style>
<link rel="preload" href="/styles.css" as="style" 
      onload="this.onload=null;this.rel='stylesheet'">

**3. Slow resource load times**

<!-- ❌ LCP image is discovered only after a stylesheet loads -->
<div class="hero"></div>

<!-- ✅ Discoverable in initial HTML and prioritized -->
<link rel="preload" href="/hero.webp" as="image" fetchpriority="high">
<img src="/hero.webp" alt="Hero" fetchpriority="high">

Prefer a discoverable `<img>` with `fetchpriority="high"`. Add the preload only when the trace shows that the resource would otherwise be discovered late; duplicate or speculative preloads can compete for bandwidth.

**4. Client-side rendering delays**

// ❌ Content loads after JavaScript
useEffect(() => {
  fetch('/api/hero-text').then(r => r.json()).then(setHeroText);
}, []);

// ✅ Server-side or static rendering
// Use SSR, SSG, or streaming to send HTML with content
export async function getServerSideProps() {
  const heroText = await fetchHeroText();
  return { props: { heroText } };
}

**5. Make navigations instant with the Speculation Rules API**

For sites with predictable same-origin journeys, prerendering a likely next page can make a successful subsequent navigation much faster. Treat this as a measured navigation optimization, not a substitute for fixing the current page's LCP.

<script type="speculationrules">
{
  "prerender": [{
    "where": { "href_matches": "/*" },
    "eagerness": "moderate"
  }]
}
</script>

Current Chrome behavior is specific enough to guide the choice:

| `eagerness` | Trigger | |-------------|---------| | `conservative` | Pointer or touch down | | `moderate` | Desktop: 200ms hover, or earlier pointer down; mobile: viewport heuristics | | `eager` | Chrome 143+: desktop 10ms hover; mobile 50ms after the anchor enters the viewport | | `immediate` | As soon as the rules are observed |

Start conservatively and measure prediction hit rate, transferred bytes, server load, and navigation improvement before expanding the rules. Recheck [Chrome's maintained eagerness documentation](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/web-platform/prerender-pages#eagerness) before hardcoding timing-sensitive behavior.

Caveats:

  • **Bandwidth/CPU cost.** Each prerender is roughly a full page load. Scope `where` carefully (`href_matches` patterns, exclude logout/checkout) and avoid `immediate` outside small sites.
  • **Side effects fire early.** Analytics, ads, and any code that runs on load will fire when the prerender starts, not when the user navigates. Gate side effects on the [`prerenderingchange` event](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/web-platform/prerender-pages#detect_when_a_page_is_prerendered_or_used_for_a_full_navigation) or `document.prerendering`.
  • **Chromium-only.** Safari and Firefox ignore the script — it's a progressive enhancement, never a regression.

LCP optimization checklist

- [ ] TTFB < 800ms (use CDN, edge caching)
- [ ] LCP resource is discoverable in initial HTML and prioritized; preload only if the trace shows late discovery
- [ ] LCP image optimized (WebP/AVIF, correct size)
- [ ] Critical CSS inlined (< 14KB)
- [ ] No render-blocking JavaScript in <head>
- [ ] Fonts don't block text rendering (font-display: swap)
- [ ] LCP element in initial HTML (not JS-rendered)
- [ ] Speculation Rules added for likely-next navigations (moderate eagerness)

LCP element identification

This snippet diagnoses the current page session. It is not field data.

// Find your LCP element
new PerformanceObserver((list) => {
  const entries = list.getEntries();
  const lastEntry = entries[entries.length - 1];
  console.log('LCP element:', lastEntry.element);
Read more
@addyosmani-2
Ships withweb-quality-skills

An (unofficial) measurement-first collection of Agent Skills for optimizing web projects with Google Lighthouse, Chrome DevTools for agents, Core Web Vitals, WCAG, and search guidance. Stack-agnostic.

Stars on GitHub

Momentum

stars in total
3.0k
Star history of addyosmani/web-quality-skills on GitHub, a chart by star-history.com

Other skills on web-quality-skills.

seo
Auto-invoked

seo

Optimize for search engine visibility and ranking. Use when asked to "improve SEO", "optimize for search", "fix meta tags", "add…

More skills from other plugins.

ai-prompt-research

ai-prompt-research

Find the questions people ask about a market, how ChatGPT answers them, and which sites get cited in the answers. Use when the…

open-seo11d26k
@every-app@every-appInstall Skill
fire-your-seo-agency

fire-your-seo-agency

SEO·AEO·GEO·LLMO·NEO(네이버) 다섯 레인을 진단하고 직접 구현하며, 인용되는 콘텐츠를 계속 생산하는 서브 블로그·콘텐츠 운영 파이프라인까지 세팅하는 스킬. 사이트를 검색엔진·답변엔진·생성 AI·네이버 AI 브리핑이…

Questions about core-web-vitals.

Which coding agents can use core-web-vitals?
core-web-vitals installs in Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenCode and Windsurf with the skills CLI, using each agent's flag shown on this page. Flowy's auto-invocation, which fires a skill when your prompt matches, runs in Claude Code only.