block-and-density
Design urban blocks and optimize density using typological analysis, FAR calculations, and building configuration strategies. Use…
Design transit-oriented developments using ITDP TOD Standard, global best practices, and density-distance gradient principles. Use when the user asks to design around a transit station, create a TOD plan, optimize development near transit, plan a transit district, design a
$ npx -y skills add Abhinavbwj/Urban-Design-Skills-Claude --skill tod-design --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/tod-designContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Design transit-oriented developments using ITDP TOD Standard, global best practices, and density-distance gradient principles. Use when the user asks to design around a transit station, create a TOD plan, optimize development near transit, plan a transit district, design a
name: tod-design description: >- Design transit-oriented developments using ITDP TOD Standard, global best practices, and density-distance gradient principles. Use when the user asks to design around a transit station, create a TOD plan, optimize development near transit, plan a transit district, design a station area, or develop around a metro stop, BRT station, tram stop, or rail station. Also use when discussing walk catchments around transit, density gradients from stations, or first-last mile connectivity.
This skill provides a complete framework for designing transit-oriented developments based on the ITDP TOD Standard v3.0, global best practices from cities like Tokyo, Hong Kong, Copenhagen, Curitiba, and Singapore, and density-distance gradient principles derived from decades of empirical research. It covers the full workflow from transit mode classification through station area planning, density calibration, use mix programming, parking management, and first-last mile connectivity design.
---
Use the following matrix to determine the baseline design parameters for any TOD project. Start by identifying the transit mode, then adjust using the context modifiers below the table.
| Transit Mode | Walk Catchment | Min Density | Typical FAR | Height Range | Character | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | **Metro / Heavy Rail** | 800m | 100 DU/ha | 3.0 - 10.0 | 6 - 40+ stories | Urban center, regional destination, highest intensity mixed-use | | **Light Rail / Tram** | 600m | 60 DU/ha | 2.0 - 5.0 | 4 - 12 stories | Urban neighborhood, linear corridor with medium-intensity nodes | | **BRT (Bus Rapid Transit)** | 500m | 50 DU/ha | 1.5 - 4.0 | 3 - 8 stories | Boulevard district, corridor-based development | | **Bus (frequent, <10 min headway)** | 400m | 30 DU/ha | 1.0 - 2.5 | 2 - 5 stories | Neighborhood center, incremental densification | | **Commuter Rail** | 800m | 40 DU/ha | 1.5 - 4.0 | 3 - 8 stories | Town center, park-and-ride transition to walkable core | | **Ferry Terminal** | 400m | 50 DU/ha | 2.0 - 5.0 | 3 - 8 stories | Waterfront district, tourism + residential + commercial |
Apply these after selecting the primary transit mode to fine-tune parameters:
| Context | Density Modifier | FAR Modifier | Notes | |---|---|---|---| | **CBD / Central City** | +50% | +2.0 to +5.0 | Highest intensity justified by regional accessibility | | **Interchange Station (2+ lines)** | +30% | +1.5 to +3.0 | Multi-modal hub attracts higher ridership and demand | | **Terminus / End-of-Line** | -20% | -0.5 to -1.0 | Lower accessibility; park-and-ride may be appropriate | | **Suburban / Greenfield** | -30% | -0.5 to -1.5 | Lower existing demand; phase density over time | | **Historic / Heritage Area** | -20% | -1.0 to -2.0 | Height and massing constraints; character preservation | | **University / Hospital Anchor** | +20% | +0.5 to +1.5 | Institutional trip generators increase demand | | **Waterfront / Park Edge** | No change | No change | Adjust massing for view corridors and public access |
The standard walk catchments above assume flat terrain and a connected street grid. Adjust as follows:
---
The Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) TOD Standard v3.0 provides an internationally recognized framework for evaluating and designing transit-oriented developments. The standard scores developments on a 0-100 scale across 8 principles. Use these principles as both a design checklist and a scoring rubric.
| Award Level | Minimum Score | Interpretation | |---|---|---| | **Gold TOD Standard** | 85 or above | World-class TOD; exemplary in all dimensions | | **Silver TOD Standard** | 70 - 84 | High-quality TOD; strong performance with minor gaps | | **Bronze TOD Standard** | 55 - 69 | Good TOD; meets core criteria but has improvement areas | | Below Bronze | Below 55 | Does not qualify as TOD; significant redesign needed |
**Goal**: Create a safe, complete, and comfortable pedestrian environment that makes walking the most attractive mode for short trips.
**Scoring Criteria**:
**Design Implications**:
**Goal**: Provide safe, connected cycling infrastructure and end-of-trip facilities that make cycling viable for trips up to 5 km.
**Scoring Cri
Design urban blocks and optimize density using typological analysis, FAR calculations, and building configuration strategies. Use…
Apply climate-specific urban design strategies for hot-arid, tropical, temperate, and cold climates. Covers building orientation,…
Estimate construction costs, infrastructure costs, soft costs, and total development costs for urban design projects. Covers…
Generate professional urban design briefs, design reports, and project documentation. Produces structured documents with vision…
Evaluate urban designs against comprehensive criteria drawn from all major global standards, certification systems, and…
Generate complete urban masterplans with spatial structure, land use distribution, street network, block layout, density…