Skip to content
Agent Orchestration
Skill

/verify-fix

Use only when the user explicitly requests verification that a security fix remediates a reported vulnerability. Do not invoke automatically while implementing fixes, reviewing ordinary code changes, or running tests. Do not use for non-security fixes, candidate finding

BOOST
From plugin
velaterm
31027 skills1 MCP
Install
$ npx -y skills add vlinx-io/VelaTerm --skill verify-fix --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/verify-fix

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Use only when the user explicitly requests verification that a security fix remediates a reported vulnerability. Do not invoke automatically while implementing fixes, reviewing ordinary code changes, or running tests. Do not use for non-security fixes, candidate finding

SKILL.md

verify-fix.SKILL.md
name: verify-fix
description: Use only when the user explicitly requests verification that a security fix remediates a reported vulnerability. Do not invoke automatically while implementing fixes, reviewing ordinary code changes, or running tests. Do not use for non-security fixes, candidate finding validation, or full repository scans.

Verify Fix

When to Use

Invoke this skill only for an explicit request to verify a security fix, including a direct `$verify-fix` invocation. A request to implement a fix or run its tests does not by itself request this skill. For other tasks, follow the user's requested workflow and response format without applying this skill's JSON result contract.

Objective

Determine whether each supplied security finding has been fixed in the current checkout. Operate in standalone verification-only mode; do not create, modify, or delete repository files, apply patches, commit changes, write artifacts, or modify issue trackers.

Assessment Method

Use `../../references/static-finding-assessment.md` to identify the original attacker-controlled source, security control, sensitive sink, reachable path, trust boundary, counterevidence, and proof gaps. If the caller already supplied that reference in the prompt, use the supplied contents without reading it again.

Verification Workflow

1. Establish the original vulnerability, its preconditions, affected security boundary, and legitimate behavior that must continue to work. 2. Confirm the current checkout contains the affected component. Follow moved or refactored code rather than treating a missing file, removed line, or changed function name as proof of remediation. 3. Trace the original exploit path through the current implementation and check the nearest relevant control, equivalent paths, and plausible bypasses. 4. Run the original reproducer, focused regression checks, or legitimate-behavior checks only when they can run without modifying the repository. Preserve exact static evidence when runtime checks are unavailable. 5. Return one result per supplied finding, in the requested order. Treat closed tickets, unrelated passing tests, and the absence of a new scan finding as insufficient proof.

Result Contract

Return exactly one JSON object:

{
  "results": [
    {
      "id": "finding-or-issue-id",
      "status": "fixed|still_vulnerable|inconclusive",
      "evidence": "specific current source, exploit, test, or proof-gap evidence"
    }
  ]
}
  • Use `fixed` only when evidence proves the original security boundary is closed and legitimate behavior remains intact.
  • Use `still_vulnerable` only when evidence proves the original vulnerable path remains reachable.
  • Use `inconclusive` for a repository mismatch, missing original context, unavailable relevant checks, an unproven legitimate control, or another material proof gap.

Never infer a stronger verdict by weakening the read-only boundary, substituting a different vulnerability, or hiding missing evidence.

Read more
Ships withvelaterm

The best ADE. Not just a terminal. Not just an IDE. Manage agent sessions like Codex. Split terminals like iTerm2. VelaTerm keeps both in one native app, and brings them to your browser and your phone. Watch the intro video (2:55) · Download · User manual

Get the whole plugin
Stats
311
Stars
37
Forks
Active
Maintenance
TypeScript
Language
MIT
License
4d ago
Last commit
2mo ago
Created
6h ago
Added

Repo: vlinx-io/VelaTerm

Other skills on velaterm.