Performs security-focused differential review of code changes (PRs, commits, diffs). Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git history for context, calculates blast radius, checks test coverage, and generates comprehensive markdown reports. Automatically detects and
Installs just this skill. Get the whole plugin for auto-invocation.
⚡ How it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
Fires itselfClaude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
Slash command/differential-review
👁️ Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Performs security-focused differential review of code changes (PRs, commits, diffs). Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git history for context, calculates blast radius, checks test coverage, and generates comprehensive markdown reports. Automatically detects and
📊 Stats
Stars6,229
Forks540
LanguagePython
LicenseCC-BY-SA-4.0
📦 Ships with trailofbits-skills
</> SKILL.md
differential-review.SKILL.md
---name: differential-review
description: >
Performs security-focused differential review of code changes (PRs, commits, diffs).
Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git history for context, calculates
blast radius, checks test coverage, and generates comprehensive markdown reports.
Automatically detects and prevents security regressions.
allowed-tools: Read Write Grep Glob Bash
---# Differential Security Review
Security-focused code review for PRs, commits, and diffs.
## Core Principles
1. **Risk-First**: Focus on auth, crypto, value transfer, external calls
2. **Evidence-Based**: Every finding backed by git history, line numbers, attack scenarios
3. **Adaptive**: Scale to codebase size (SMALL/MEDIUM/LARGE)
4. **Honest**: Explicitly state coverage limits and confidence level
5. **Output-Driven**: Always generate comprehensive markdown report file
---## Rationalizations (Do Not Skip)
| Rationalization | Why It's Wrong | Required Action |
|-----------------|----------------|-----------------|
| "Small PR, quick review" | Heartbleed was 2 lines | Classify by RISK, not size |
| "I know this codebase" | Familiarity breeds blind spots | Build explicit baseline context |
