/ai-prompt-regression-testing

name: ai-prompt-regression-testing
description: 'Prompt engineering regression test matrix register: baseline outputs, semantic drift thresholds, judge evaluations, and golden dataset.'
category: engineering
risk: safe
source: self
source_type: self
date_added: "2026-10-01"
author: Ranjeet2063
tags: [ai, prompt-engineering, testing, evaluation, llm, benchmarking]
tools: []
source_repo: Ranjeet2063/agentic-awesome-skills

AI Prompt Regression Test Matrix

**What it is:** Tracks regression baselines, evaluation rubrics, and automated judge verdicts to prevent output degradation across prompt revisions.

Overview

Provides a standardized, auditable framework and data model for **AI Prompt Regression Test Matrix** operations across distributed engineering and decentralized application systems.

When to Use This Skill

• When formalizing architectural contracts, security invariants, or operational limits for AI Prompt Regression Test Matrix.
• When cross-functional review is required between protocol developers, smart contract auditors, and AI engineering agents.
• When generating reproducible CSV, SQL DDL, JSON Schema, and Notion property registers for tracking compliance.

How It Works

1. Define the parameters, thresholds, and identity bindings required for the target operational register. 2. Select appropriate boundary enforcement values from validated enum select sets. 3. Export standardized artifacts (CSV table, SQL DDL, JSON Schema) to integrate into validation CI pipelines.

Field Reference

| # | Field Name | Type | SQL Type | JSON Schema Type | Notion Property Type | Example Value | |---|------------|------|----------|------------------|----------------------|---------------| | 1 | Prompt TestCase ID | `id` | `SERIAL PRIMARY KEY` | `integer` | Text | `PTEST-001` | | 2 | Prompt Identifier | `text` | `VARCHAR(64)` | `string` | Text | `soroban_code_refactor_v2` | | 3 | Target LLM Model Family | `select` | `VARCHAR(64)` | `string` | Select | `Claude 3.5 Sonnet` | | 4 | Evaluation Metric | `select` | `VARCHAR(64)` | `string` | Select | `AST Code Correctness` | | 5 | Semantic Drift Threshold | `number` | `NUMERIC(5,2)` | `number` | Number | `0.05` | | 6 | Golden Baseline Match % | `number` | `NUMERIC(5,2)` | `number` | Number | `98.50` | | 7 | Judge Model Evaluator | `text` | `VARCHAR(64)` | `string` | Text | `Gemini 1.5 Pro` | | 8 | Zero-Shot Reasoning Verified | `select` | `VARCHAR(16)` | `string` | Select | `Yes` | | 9 | Latency Bound Seconds | `number` | `NUMERIC(6,2)` | `number` | Number | `3.20` | | 10 | Test Suite Verdict | `select` | `VARCHAR(32)` | `string` | Select | `Passed` | | 11 | Benchmarking Date | `date` | `DATE` | `string, format: date` | Date | `2026-10-01` |

Select Options

**Target LLM Model Family**

Claude 3.5 Sonnet | GPT-4o | Gemini 1.5 Pro | DeepSeek Coder

**Evaluation Metric**

AST Code Correctness | Semantic Embedding Cosine | Exact Match | Rubric Scoring

**Zero-Shot Reasoning Verified**

Yes | No

**Test Suite Verdict**

Passed | Degraded | Failed Regression

Relations

• `Audit Reference` -> links to the formal review documentation or test repository.
• `Target Architecture` -> links to the deployed contract or autonomous agent runtime component.

Examples

**Prompt**

How do I configure and track AI Prompt Regression Test Matrix for our production environment?

**Recommended Next Step**

> Generate the unified field schema, SQL DDL migration, and JSON validation schema to register into your system catalog. > > Workflow: Define criteria -> Run automated verification -> Record baseline -> Monitor invariants.

Best Practices

• Enforce strict typing on numerical bounds and currency amounts; avoid unstructured free-text fields for critical states.
• Re-run validation test suites on every state-altering commit or parameter change.
• Keep example data synthetic and isolated from production cryptographic keys or private endpoints.

Limitations

• Provides architectural specifications, data models, and verification schemas; does not execute direct transaction signing without authorized external tooling.
• Requires network connectivity and valid RPC credentials when querying on-chain states.

Security & Safety Notes

• All parameters declare `risk: safe`. No unauthorized state modification or privileged credential access is performed.
• Use synthetic dummy keys and mock addresses in test suites and local verification scripts.

Common Pitfalls

• **Problem:** Mismatched decimal precision between contract runtime and database register.

**Solution:** Always verify decimals using the explicit field mapping in this reference.

• **Problem:** Missing authorization checks prior to state update.

**Solution:** Cross-validate against the Security Audit register before deployment.

Related Skills

• @ai-agent-tool-routing - covers tool schema registration and retry policy.
• @cross-chain-relayer-audit - covers message hashes, nonces and quorum proofs.
• @smart-contract-formal-verification - verifies state invariants mathematically.

Reusable Prompt

I want to establish a verified AI Prompt Regression Test Matrix register for our production protocol.
Guide me through the required field parameters and output the corresponding SQL DDL and JSON Schema.