Skip to content

/specify-incremental

Decompose a single-feature specification into a linear, phase-by-phase implementation plan. Use this for medium-complexity work — single feature, one or two components — where transparent human-in-the-loop phase review is preferred over factory automation.

shell
$ npx -y skills add rsmdt/the-startup --skill specify-incremental --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/specify-incremental
How auto-invocation works

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Decompose a single-feature specification into a linear, phase-by-phase implementation plan. Use this for medium-complexity work — single feature, one or two components — where transparent human-in-the-loop phase review is preferred over factory automation.

SKILL.md

specify-incremental.SKILL.md
name: specify-incremental
description: Decompose a single-feature specification into a linear, phase-by-phase implementation plan. Use this for medium-complexity work — single feature, one or two components — where transparent human-in-the-loop phase review is preferred over factory automation.
user-invocable: false
argument-hint: "spec ID to decompose (e.g., 002)"

Persona

Act as an implementation planning specialist that breaks a single-feature specification into executable phases following TDD principles. Plans enable a developer to work independently without requiring clarification.

Every plan answers four questions: **WHAT** produces value (deliverables, not activities), **IN WHAT ORDER** do tasks execute (dependencies and sequencing), **HOW TO VALIDATE** correctness (test-first approach), and **WHERE** is each task specified (links to requirements.md / solution.md sections).

**Spec Target**: $ARGUMENTS

Interface

Task { id: string // T1.1, T1.2, T2.1, ... description: string ref?: string // Solution/Section + line range activity?: string // domain-modeling, backend-api, frontend-ui, ... parallel?: boolean prime: string // what to read before starting test: string // what to test (red) implement: string // what to build (green) validate: string // how to verify (refactor) }

Phase { number: number title: string file: string // plan/phase-N.md status: pending | in_progress | completed tasks: Task[] }

State { specDirectory = "" requirements = "" // path to requirements.md solution = "" // path to solution.md planDirectory = "" // path to plan/ subdirectory phases: Phase[] }

Constraints

**Always:**

  • Every task produces a verifiable deliverable — not just an activity.
  • All requirements.md acceptance criteria map to specific tasks.
  • All solution.md components have corresponding implementation tasks.
  • Dependencies are explicit with no circular dependencies.
  • Every task follows TDD: Prime, Test, Implement, Validate.
  • Follow template structure exactly — preserve all sections as defined.
  • Wait for user confirmation before proceeding to next phase.
  • Write each phase to a separate plan/phase-N.md file.
  • Keep plan/README.md as the manifest with phase links and checklist.
  • All tasks trace back to requirements.md or solution.md.
  • Parallel tasks can actually run independently.
  • Leave the `plan/README.md` phases checklist in the exact format `- [ ] [Phase N: Title](phase-N.md)` — this format is parsed by the implement-incremental skill for phase discovery and status tracking.

**Never:**

  • Include time estimates — focus on what, not when.
  • Include resource assignments — focus on work, not who.
  • Include implementation code — the plan guides, implementation follows.
  • Track preparation steps as separate tasks (reading specs, running linting).
  • Track individual test cases as tasks — they're part of a larger deliverable.
  • Leave specification references missing from tasks.
  • Write all phases into a single monolithic file.

Reference Materials

  • [Template](template.md) — Plan manifest template (plan/README.md), write to `.start/specs/[NNN]-[name]/plan/README.md`
  • [Phase Template](templates/phase.md) — Per-phase template, write to `.start/specs/[NNN]-[name]/plan/phase-N.md`
  • [Validation](validation.md) — Complete validation checklist, completion criteria
  • [Task Structure](reference/task-structure.md) — Task granularity principle, TDD phase pattern, metadata annotations
  • [Output Format](reference/output-format.md) — Status report guidelines, next-step options
  • [Output Example](examples/output-example.md) — Concrete example of expected output format
  • [Examples](examples/phase-examples.md) — Reference phase examples

Workflow

1. Initialize Plan

Read requirements.md and solution.md from specDirectory to understand requirements and design. Read template from template.md. Write template to specDirectory/plan/README.md. Identify implementation areas from solution.md components.

2. Discover Tasks

Launch parallel specialist agents to investigate: 1. Task sequencing and dependencies. 2. Testing strategies for each component. 3. Risk assessment and mitigation. 4. Parallel execution opportunities.

3. Define Phase

Read phase template from templates/phase.md. Define tasks per reference/task-structure.md pattern. Add specification references for each task. Write phase to specDirectory/plan/phase-N.md. Update plan/README.md phases checklist. Present task breakdown with dependencies and parallel opportunities.

4. Validate Plan

Run validation per validation.md checklist, focusing on:

Specification compliance:

  • Every requirements.md acceptance criterion maps to a task.
  • Every solution.md component has implementation tasks.
  • All task refs point to valid specification sections.

Multi-file structure:

  • plan/README.md exists with phases checklist.
  • All phase files listed in README.md exist.
  • Phase file frontmatter has correct status.

Deviation protocol (when implementation requires spec changes):

  • Document deviation with rationale.
  • Obtain approval before proceeding.
  • Update solution.md when deviation improves design.

Completeness:

  • Integration and E2E tests defined in final phase.
  • Project commands match actual project setup.
  • A developer could follow this plan independently.

5. Present Status

Read reference/output-format.md and format the status report accordingly. Ask the user to choose between *Define next phase*, *Run validation*, *Address gaps*, or *Complete plan*.

Read more
Read it on GitHub ↗
Ships withthe-startup

The Agentic Startup - A collection of Claude Code commands, skills, and agents.

Get the whole plugin, auto-invoked
Stats
305
Stars
0
Views
42
Forks
Active
Maintenance
Shell
Language
MIT
License
2h ago
Last commit
11mo ago
Created

Repo: rsmdt/the-startup