/validation-pipeline
Runs multi-stage validation gates with per-step scoring, pass/fail verdicts, and aggregate quality reports. Use when validating requirements, code, or artifacts through structured gate enforcement before merge or release.
$ npx -y skills add proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill validation-pipeline --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/validation-pipeline
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Runs multi-stage validation gates with per-step scoring, pass/fail verdicts, and aggregate quality reports. Use when validating requirements, code, or artifacts through structured gate enforcement before merge or release.
SKILL.md
validation-pipeline.SKILL.mdname: "validation-pipeline"
description: "Runs multi-stage validation gates with per-step scoring, pass/fail verdicts, and aggregate quality reports. Use when validating requirements, code, or artifacts through structured gate enforcement before merge or release."
trust_tier: 3
validation:
schema_path: schemas/output.json
validator_path: scripts/validate-config.json
eval_path: evals/validation-pipeline.yaml
Validation Pipeline
Purpose
Run structured validation pipelines that execute steps sequentially, enforce gates at blocking failures, and produce scored reports. Uses `.claude/helpers/validation-pipeline.cjs` with 13 requirements validation steps (BMAD-003).
Activation
- When validating requirements documents
- When running structured quality gates
- When assessing document completeness, testability, or traceability
- When invoked via `/validation-pipeline`
Quick Start
# Validate a requirements document (all 13 steps)
/validation-pipeline requirements docs/requirements.md
# Validate with specific steps only
/validation-pipeline requirements docs/requirements.md --steps format-check,completeness-check,invest-criteria
# Continue past blocking failures
/validation-pipeline requirements docs/requirements.md --continue-on-failure
# Output as JSON
/validation-pipeline requirements docs/requirements.md --json
Workflow
Step 1: Read the Target Document
Read the file specified by the user. If no file is provided, ask for one.
Read the target document using the Read tool.
Store the content for pipeline execution.
Step 2: Select Pipeline
Choose the appropriate pipeline based on the user's request:
| Pipeline | Steps | Use Case | |----------|-------|----------| | `requirements` | 13 | Requirements documents, PRDs, user stories |
Additional pipelines can be added to `.claude/helpers/validation-pipeline.cjs`.
Step 3: Execute Pipeline
The pipeline helper (`.claude/helpers/validation-pipeline.cjs`) handles execution:
1. **Sequential execution** — steps run in order, each receiving results from prior steps 2. **Gate enforcement** — blocking steps that fail halt the pipeline (unless `--continue-on-failure`) 3. **Per-step scoring** — each step produces a 0-100 score with findings and evidence 4. **Weighted rollup** — overall score uses category weights (format=10%, content=30%, quality=25%, traceability=20%, compliance=15%)
Requirements Pipeline Steps (13 total)
| # | Step ID | Category | Severity | What It Checks | |---|---------|----------|----------|----------------| | 1 | `format-check` | format | blocking | Headings, required sections, document length | | 2 | `completeness-check` | content | blocking | Required fields populated, acceptance criteria present | | 3 | `invest-criteria` | quality | warning | Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable | | 4 | `smart-acceptance` | quality | warning | Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound | | 5 | `testability-score` | quality | warning | Can each requirement be tested? | | 6 | `vague-term-detection` | content | info | Flags "should", "might", "various", "etc." | | 7 | `information-density` | content | info | Every sentence carries weight, no filler | | 8 | `traceability-check` | traceability | warning | Requirements-to-tests mapping exists | | 9 | `implementation-leakage` | quality | warning | Requirements don't prescribe implementation | | 10 | `domain-compliance` | compliance | info | Alignment with domain model | | 11 | `dependency-analysis` | traceability | info | Cross-requirement dependencies identified | | 12 | `bdd-scenario-generation` | quality | warning | Can generate Given/When/Then for each requirement | | 13 | `holistic-quality` | compliance | blocking | Overall coherence, no contradictions |
Step 4: Report Results
Format the pipeline result as a structured report:
# Validation Report: Requirements Pipeline
**Overall**: PASS/FAIL/WARN | **Score**: 85/100 | **Duration**: 42ms
## Step Results
| # | Step | Status | Score | Findings | Duration |
|---|------|--------|-------|----------|----------|
| 1 | Format Check | PASS | 100 | 0 | 2ms |
| 2 | Completeness | WARN | 60 | 2 | 5ms |
...
## Blockers
- (blocking findings listed here)
## All Findings
- [HIGH] Missing acceptance criteria: Requirement US-104 has no AC
- [MEDIUM] Vague term: "should" used 5 times without specifics
...
Step 5: Record Learning
After pipeline execution, record the outcome for learning:
// Store validation pattern
memory store --namespace validation-pipeline --key "req-validation-{timestamp}" --value "{score, findings_count, halted}"Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Default | Description | |-----------|------|---------|-------------| | `pipeline` | string | `requirements` | Pipeline type to run | | `file` | string | required | Path to document to validate | | `--steps` | string | all | Comma-separated step IDs to run (e.g., `format-check,completeness-check`) | | `--continue-on-failure` | boolean | false | Skip blocking gates | | `--json` | boolean | false | Output as JSON instead of markdown | | `--metadata` | object | {} | Additional context for steps |
Integration Points
- **qe-requirements-validator agent** — delegates structured validation to this pipeline
- **qe-quality-gate agent** — uses pipeline for gate evaluation
- **YAML Pipelines** — can invoke validation steps as workflow actions
- **MCP** — accessible via `pipeline_validate` tool
Output Schema
The pipeline produces a `PipelineResult` object (see `schemas/output.json`):
{
pipelineId: string;
pipelineName: string;
overall: 'pass' | 'fail' | 'warn';
score: number; // 0-100 weighted average
steps: StepResult[]; // per-step details
blockers: FiRead more
name: "validation-pipeline" description: "Runs multi-stage validation gates with per-step scoring, pass/fail verdicts, and aggregate quality reports. Use when validating requirements, code, or artifacts through structured gate enforcement before merge or release." trust_tier: 3 validation: schema_path: schemas/output.json validator_path: scripts/validate-config.json eval_path: evals/validation-pipeline.yaml
Validation Pipeline
Purpose
Run structured validation pipelines that execute steps sequentially, enforce gates at blocking failures, and produce scored reports. Uses `.claude/helpers/validation-pipeline.cjs` with 13 requirements validation steps (BMAD-003).
Activation
- When validating requirements documents
- When running structured quality gates
- When assessing document completeness, testability, or traceability
- When invoked via `/validation-pipeline`
Quick Start
# Validate a requirements document (all 13 steps) /validation-pipeline requirements docs/requirements.md # Validate with specific steps only /validation-pipeline requirements docs/requirements.md --steps format-check,completeness-check,invest-criteria # Continue past blocking failures /validation-pipeline requirements docs/requirements.md --continue-on-failure # Output as JSON /validation-pipeline requirements docs/requirements.md --json
Workflow
Step 1: Read the Target Document
Read the file specified by the user. If no file is provided, ask for one.
Read the target document using the Read tool. Store the content for pipeline execution.
Step 2: Select Pipeline
Choose the appropriate pipeline based on the user's request:
| Pipeline | Steps | Use Case | |----------|-------|----------| | `requirements` | 13 | Requirements documents, PRDs, user stories |
Additional pipelines can be added to `.claude/helpers/validation-pipeline.cjs`.
Step 3: Execute Pipeline
The pipeline helper (`.claude/helpers/validation-pipeline.cjs`) handles execution:
1. **Sequential execution** — steps run in order, each receiving results from prior steps 2. **Gate enforcement** — blocking steps that fail halt the pipeline (unless `--continue-on-failure`) 3. **Per-step scoring** — each step produces a 0-100 score with findings and evidence 4. **Weighted rollup** — overall score uses category weights (format=10%, content=30%, quality=25%, traceability=20%, compliance=15%)
Requirements Pipeline Steps (13 total)
| # | Step ID | Category | Severity | What It Checks | |---|---------|----------|----------|----------------| | 1 | `format-check` | format | blocking | Headings, required sections, document length | | 2 | `completeness-check` | content | blocking | Required fields populated, acceptance criteria present | | 3 | `invest-criteria` | quality | warning | Independent, Negotiable, Valuable, Estimable, Small, Testable | | 4 | `smart-acceptance` | quality | warning | Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound | | 5 | `testability-score` | quality | warning | Can each requirement be tested? | | 6 | `vague-term-detection` | content | info | Flags "should", "might", "various", "etc." | | 7 | `information-density` | content | info | Every sentence carries weight, no filler | | 8 | `traceability-check` | traceability | warning | Requirements-to-tests mapping exists | | 9 | `implementation-leakage` | quality | warning | Requirements don't prescribe implementation | | 10 | `domain-compliance` | compliance | info | Alignment with domain model | | 11 | `dependency-analysis` | traceability | info | Cross-requirement dependencies identified | | 12 | `bdd-scenario-generation` | quality | warning | Can generate Given/When/Then for each requirement | | 13 | `holistic-quality` | compliance | blocking | Overall coherence, no contradictions |
Step 4: Report Results
Format the pipeline result as a structured report:
# Validation Report: Requirements Pipeline **Overall**: PASS/FAIL/WARN | **Score**: 85/100 | **Duration**: 42ms ## Step Results | # | Step | Status | Score | Findings | Duration | |---|------|--------|-------|----------|----------| | 1 | Format Check | PASS | 100 | 0 | 2ms | | 2 | Completeness | WARN | 60 | 2 | 5ms | ... ## Blockers - (blocking findings listed here) ## All Findings - [HIGH] Missing acceptance criteria: Requirement US-104 has no AC - [MEDIUM] Vague term: "should" used 5 times without specifics ...
Step 5: Record Learning
After pipeline execution, record the outcome for learning:
// Store validation pattern
memory store --namespace validation-pipeline --key "req-validation-{timestamp}" --value "{score, findings_count, halted}"Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Default | Description | |-----------|------|---------|-------------| | `pipeline` | string | `requirements` | Pipeline type to run | | `file` | string | required | Path to document to validate | | `--steps` | string | all | Comma-separated step IDs to run (e.g., `format-check,completeness-check`) | | `--continue-on-failure` | boolean | false | Skip blocking gates | | `--json` | boolean | false | Output as JSON instead of markdown | | `--metadata` | object | {} | Additional context for steps |
Integration Points
- **qe-requirements-validator agent** — delegates structured validation to this pipeline
- **qe-quality-gate agent** — uses pipeline for gate evaluation
- **YAML Pipelines** — can invoke validation steps as workflow actions
- **MCP** — accessible via `pipeline_validate` tool
Output Schema
The pipeline produces a `PipelineResult` object (see `schemas/output.json`):
{
pipelineId: string;
pipelineName: string;
overall: 'pass' | 'fail' | 'warn';
score: number; // 0-100 weighted average
steps: StepResult[]; // per-step details
blockers: FiAI-powered quality engineering agents that generate tests, find coverage gaps, detect flaky tests, and learn your codebase patterns — across 11 coding agent platforms.
Repo: proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
Other skills on agentic-qe.
- /a11y-ally
Use when running comprehensive WCAG accessibility audits with axe-core + pa11y + Lighthouse, generating context-aware remediation, or testing video accessibility. Supports 3-tier browser cascade with graceful degradation.
Open skill - /accessibility-testing
WCAG 2.2 compliance testing, screen reader validation, and inclusive design verification. Use when ensuring legal compliance (ADA, Section 508), testing for disabilities, or building accessible applications for 1 billion disabled users globally.
Open skill - /agentdb-advanced
Master advanced AgentDB features including QUIC synchronization, multi-database management, custom distance metrics, hybrid search, and distributed systems integration. Use when building distributed AI systems, multi-agent coordination, or advanced vector search applications.
Open skill - /agentdb-learning
Create and train AI learning plugins with AgentDB's 9 reinforcement learning algorithms. Includes Decision Transformer, Q-Learning, SARSA, Actor-Critic, and more. Use when building self-learning agents, implementing RL, or optimizing agent behavior through experience.
Open skill - /agentdb-memory-patterns
Implement persistent memory patterns for AI agents using AgentDB. Includes session memory, long-term storage, pattern learning, and context management. Use when building stateful agents, chat systems, or intelligent assistants.
Open skill - /agentdb-optimization
Optimize AgentDB performance with quantization (4-32x memory reduction), HNSW indexing (150x faster search), caching, and batch operations. Use when optimizing memory usage, improving search speed, or scaling to millions of vectors.
Open skill

