analyze-code-quality
Advanced code quality analysis agent for comprehensive code reviews and improvements
James Bach's Heuristic Test Strategy Model (HTSM) v6.3 Quality Criteria framework.
> /plugin marketplace add proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe > /plugin install agentic-qe-fleet@agentic-qe
How it fires
How this agent gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this agent.
James Bach's Heuristic Test Strategy Model (HTSM) v6.3 Quality Criteria framework.
James Bach's Heuristic Test Strategy Model (HTSM) v6.3 Quality Criteria framework.
**Can it perform the required functions?**
| Subcategory | Focus | |-------------|-------| | Sufficiency | Does it do what it's supposed to? | | Correctness | Does it do it correctly? |
**Priority Indicators:**
**Will it work well and resist failure?**
| Subcategory | Focus | |-------------|-------| | Robustness | Can it handle adverse conditions? | | Error Handling | Does it handle errors gracefully? | | Data Integrity | Is data protected from corruption? | | Safety | Does it avoid dangerous behaviors? |
**Cannot be omitted** - All systems can fail.
**How easy is it for real users?**
| Subcategory | Focus | |-------------|-------| | Learnability | How quickly can users learn? | | Operability | How easy to operate day-to-day? | | Accessibility | Can users with disabilities use it? |
**How appealing is the product?**
| Subcategory | Focus | |-------------|-------| | Aesthetics | Is it visually pleasing? | | Uniqueness | Does it stand out? | | Entrancement | Does it engage users? | | Image | Does it project the right brand? |
**Note:** "Brand guidelines handled separately" is NOT a valid omission reason. Charisma is about UX testing, not brand documentation.
**How well protected against unauthorized use?**
| Subcategory | Focus | |-------------|-------| | Authentication | Who is using it? | | Authorization | What are they allowed to do? | | Privacy | Is personal data protected? | | Security Holes | Are there vulnerabilities? |
**Cannot be omitted** - Every system has attack surface.
**How well does deployment scale?**
| Subcategory | Focus | |-------------|-------| | Load Handling | Behavior under increased demand | | Resource Efficiency | Resource usage at scale |
**Works with external components?**
| Subcategory | Focus | |-------------|-------| | Application | Works with other applications? | | OS | Works with target operating systems? | | Hardware | Works with target hardware? | | Backward | Works with previous versions? | | Product Footprint | Resource requirements acceptable? |
**How speedy and responsive?**
| Subcategory | Focus | |-------------|-------| | Response Time | Under various conditions | | Throughput | Data processing capacity | | Efficiency | Resource utilization |
**Cannot be omitted** - Every system has response time.
**How easily installed?**
| Subcategory | Focus | |-------------|-------| | System Requirements | Clear and achievable? | | Configuration | Easy to configure? | | Uninstallation | Clean removal? | | Upgrades/Patches | Easy to update? | | Administration | Easy to administer? |
**Valid omission:** Pure SaaS/browser-based with no client installation.
**How well can we create/test/modify?**
| Subcategory | Focus | |-------------|-------| | Supportability | Easy to support? | | Testability | Easy to test? | | Maintainability | Easy to maintain? | | Portability | Easy to port? | | Localizability | Easy to localize? |
**Cannot be omitted** - Always applies to software.
---
| Priority | Definition | Example | |----------|------------|---------| | **P0 (Critical)** | Failure causes immediate business/user harm | Payment failures, data breaches | | **P1 (High)** | Critical to core user value proposition | Core features not working | | **P2 (Medium)** | Affects satisfaction but not blocking | Secondary features | | **P3 (Low)** | Nice-to-have improvements | Polish, edge case optimization |
| Category | Valid Omission | Invalid Omission | |----------|----------------|------------------| | Installability | "Pure SaaS, no client installation" | "Handled by ops team" | | Charisma | "CLI tool, visual design N/A" | "Brand guidelines separate" | | Compatibility | "Single-platform by contract" | "Will test on main browsers" | | Development | **NEVER** | "Team is experienced" | | Security | **NEVER** | "Internal system only" |
AI-powered quality engineering agents that generate tests, find coverage gaps, detect flaky tests, and learn your codebase patterns — across 11 coding agent platforms.
Repo: proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
Advanced code quality analysis agent for comprehensive code reviews and improvements
Advanced code quality analysis agent for comprehensive code reviews and improvements
Expert agent for system architecture design, patterns, and high-level technical decisions
Coordinates Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus protocols with malicious actor detection
Implements Conflict-free Replicated Data Types for eventually consistent state synchronization
Coordinates gossip-based consensus protocols for scalable eventually consistent systems