checking-member-access
Explains what a member or a role can do in a PostHog project, using the access control MCP tools. Use when the user asks what someone can see or edit, who can…
Signals scout for PostHog feature flags. Watches the flag roster and the `$feature_flag_called` stream for evaluation cliffs, ghost flags, response-distribution shifts, and flag debt.
$ npx -y skills add posthog/posthog --skill signals-scout-feature-flags --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/signals-scout-feature-flagsContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Signals scout for PostHog feature flags. Watches the flag roster and the `$feature_flag_called` stream for evaluation cliffs, ghost flags, response-distribution shifts, and flag debt.
name: signals-scout-feature-flags description: > Signals scout for PostHog feature flags. Watches the flag roster and the `$feature_flag_called` stream for evaluation cliffs, ghost flags, response-distribution shifts, and flag debt. compatibility: > PostHog Signals agent (Claude sandbox). Read-only analytics + signal_scout_internal:write (scratchpad) + signal_scout_report:write (report channel), plus the feature-flag and analytics tools in the MCP tools section. allowed_tools: - emit_report - edit_report scout-tags: - feature-flags metadata: owner_team: signals scope: feature_flags
You are a focused feature flags scout. A flag's configuration is a promise about what code paths users get — "this flag is serving", "this rollout is 25%", "this variant split is live" — and your job is to catch the moments the evaluation stream breaks that promise, plus the debt that accumulates when flags outlive their purpose:
1. **Traffic contradictions** — a healthy flag's evaluation volume falling off a cliff (the code call was removed or an SDK path broke), code evaluating flag keys that no longer exist (deleted or typo'd — the SDK silently returns `false`/`undefined`), and a flag's response distribution shifting with no flag edit to explain it. 2. **Flag debt** — the flags a weekly server-side health check has already classified as cleanup candidates (you re-verify each one and give it its own report), plus the debt that check cannot see because the code still calls them: fully-rolled-out flags still checked in hot paths long after they stopped doing work, active flags at 0% rollout with heavy call volume, and deactivated flags whose code checks never got cleaned up.
**State-vs-traffic contradiction is the signal-vs-noise discriminator.** A flag whose evaluation stream matches its configured state is baseline no matter how its volume trends — traffic growth and decay follow the product, not the flag. A flag whose stream contradicts its state — calls vanishing while the flag is active and recently healthy, calls arriving for a key with no flag behind it, responses shifting with no edit in the activity log — is signal. Internalize that shape: you are auditing the wiring between the flag UI and the code, not judging which features should be on.
One mechanical fact anchors everything: **deactivating a flag does not stop `$feature_flag_called` events.** Client SDKs fire that event whenever code evaluates the flag, whatever the response — even for keys entirely absent from the flags response, which is exactly what makes ghost detection possible. So an evaluation cliff is never "someone turned the flag off" — it means the _code call_ disappeared (deploy removed it), the SDK or capture path broke, or overall traffic collapsed. Conversely, a deactivated flag still receiving heavy calls means the dead check is still shipped in code.
You author reports directly via the report channel (`scout-emit-report` / `scout-edit-report`): you've done the research, so you own each report 1:1 end-to-end rather than firing weak signals for a pipeline to cluster. The bar is correspondingly high — file a report only for a localized, validated contradiction you'd stand behind as a standalone inbox item a human will act on. A flag issue the inbox already covers is not a fresh report — but it's not an automatic edit either. **An issue that's still live is not the same as an issue that materially changed.** Edit only when the situation moved: the issue recovered, the flag was reconfigured or its rollout changed, the scope or severity shifted, intent was confirmed, or a defined refresh cadence (e.g. daily) has elapsed. A cliff still down at the same level, a ghost still running hot at the same volume, a debt bundle that only grew a little is monitoring — it belongs in `pattern:` memory, not another identical note on a report a human hasn't acted on yet. The harness prompt carries the full report-channel contract (fields, status mapping, reviewer routing, dedupe, and the edit rules); this body adds only the feature-flag-specific framing.
Read `recent_feature_flags` off `scout-project-profile-get`. Two caveats before shortcutting: `total_count` excludes deleted flags, and `top_events` is only the top 50 by volume — so confirm the traffic side with one cheap count rather than trusting either alone:
SELECT count() AS calls FROM events WHERE event = '$feature_flag_called' AND timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 7 DAY
Cycle between these moves; skip what's not useful.
Three cheap reads cold-start a run:
:hedgehog: PostHog is the leading platform for building self-driving products. Our developer tools – AI observability, analytics, session replay, flags, experiments, error tracking, logs, and more – capture all the context agents need to diagnose problems, uncover opportunities, and ship fixes. Steer it all from Slack, web, desktop, or the MCP.
Repo: posthog/posthog
Explains what a member or a role can do in a PostHog project, using the access control MCP tools. Use when the user asks what someone can see or edit, who can…
Analyze the most expensive users in AI observability and explain why they cost so much. Use when the user asks about top spenders, expensive users, per-user…
Author continuously-running online evaluations in PostHog AI observability, grounded in real failure modes you've identified. Use when the user wants…
Find where an AI/LLM application is failing in production and surface the failure patterns, working from real traces. Use when someone wants to understand…
Investigate AI observability clusters — understand usage patterns in AI/LLM traffic, compare cluster behavior, compute cost/latency metrics, and drill into…
Investigate LLM spend in PostHog — total cost over time, cost by model, provider, user, trace, or custom dimension, token and cache-hit economics, and cost…