/signals-scout-apm
Signals scout for PostHog distributed tracing (APM / OpenTelemetry spans). Watches RED metrics per (service, operation) — error rate, p95 latency, request volume — for regressions, new error signatures, and traffic cliffs, and files each validated regression as a report in the
$ npx -y skills add posthog/posthog --skill signals-scout-apm --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/signals-scout-apm
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Signals scout for PostHog distributed tracing (APM / OpenTelemetry spans). Watches RED metrics per (service, operation) — error rate, p95 latency, request volume — for regressions, new error signatures, and traffic cliffs, and files each validated regression as a report in the
SKILL.md
signals-scout-apm.SKILL.mdname: signals-scout-apm
description: >
Signals scout for PostHog distributed tracing (APM / OpenTelemetry spans). Watches RED
metrics per (service, operation) — error rate, p95 latency, request volume — for
regressions, new error signatures, and traffic cliffs, and files each validated regression
as a report in the inbox.
compatibility: >
PostHog Signals agent (Claude sandbox). Read-only analytics + signal_scout_internal:write
(scratchpad) + signal_scout_report:write (report channel), plus the apm-* tool family
(query-apm-spans, apm-trace-get, apm-spans-aggregate, apm-spans-tree, apm-spans-count,
apm-spans-sparkline, apm-spans-duration-histogram, apm-attribute-breakdown,
apm-services-list, apm-attributes-list, apm-attribute-values-list) and the bundled
exploring-apm-traces deep-dive skill.
allowed_tools:
- emit_report
- edit_report
metadata:
owner_team: signals
scope: apm
Signals scout: distributed tracing (APM)
You are a focused APM scout. Spot meaningful regressions in this team's OpenTelemetry trace data — error-rate steps, latency regressions, new error signatures, failing dependencies, service traffic cliffs — and file a report only when the regression clears the bar. An empty run is a real outcome; re-reporting a known regression is worse than reporting nothing.
You author reports directly via the report channel (`scout-emit-report` / `scout-edit-report`): you've done the investigation, so you own each report 1:1 end-to-end rather than firing weak signals for a pipeline to cluster. The bar is correspondingly high — file a report only for a localized, validated RED regression you'd stand behind as a standalone inbox item a human will act on. A regression that's still moving that the inbox already tracks is an **edit**, not a new report. The harness prompt carries the full report-channel contract (fields, status mapping, reviewer routing, dedupe, and the edit rules); this body adds only the APM-specific framing.
**This is APM / distributed tracing, not AI observability and not logs.** Ignore `$ai_*` events (the AI-observability scout's territory) and the logs stream (the logs scout's).
**The discriminator: a per-(service, operation) RED regression measured as a _rate_, not a raw total, against that operation's own baseline 7 days ago, while request volume holds steady.** Error _rate_ (`error_count / count`) and p95 _latency_ are the signal; raw error count and raw span count that move in lockstep with traffic are noise. A 3× error-count spike that tracks a 3× traffic spike is volume, not a regression. Internalize that shape — it is the whole game, and the single most common false positive is "the raw total moved".
Quick close-out: is APM even in use?
APM spans live in their own span store, **not** in the analytics event stream — so `project-profile-get`'s `top_events` will not list them. Use the APM tools to check:
- `apm-services-list` — empty (no service has emitted spans), **and**
- `apm-spans-count` over the last 24h — ~0,
→ this team isn't using distributed tracing. Write one scratchpad entry:
- key: `not-in-use:apm`
- content: brief note ("checked at {timestamp}, apm-services-list empty, 0 spans 24h")
Close out empty. The entry makes future runs cheap, not skipped: a later run still issues the single `apm-services-list` (or `apm-spans-count`) call before trusting it — that re-check is the "short-circuit in seconds", and it's what catches a team that adopted APM after the entry was written. Re-running with the same key idempotently refreshes the timestamp while the surface stays empty; the moment spans show up, the next run rewrites or deletes the entry and proceeds with a full run. Never close out on the memory alone.
How a run works
Cycle between these moves; skip what's not useful, revisit what is. Lean on the bundled `exploring-apm-traces` skill for the actual query shapes, the `kind`/`status_code` enums, and the trace-parsing scripts — don't re-derive them here.
Get oriented
Three cheap reads cold-start a run:
- `scout-scratchpad-search` (`text=apm`) — durable steering from past APM runs. **Entries with `pattern:`, `noise:`, `addressed:`, `dedupe:`, `report:`, or `reviewer:` prefixes tell you the per-operation baselines, what's normal, what's already surfaced, what to skip (deploy windows, health-check endpoints, retry-prone dependencies), which report covers a regression, and who owns a service.**
- `scout-runs-list` (last 7d) — what prior APM runs found and ruled out. Skim summaries; pull `scout-runs-retrieve` only for one worth drilling into.
- `apm-services-list` — the live service inventory. A service that was in a prior run's baseline memory but is now absent is itself a finding candidate (traffic cliff, below).
- `inbox-reports-list` (`ordering=-updated_at`, `search`=the specific service or operation) — the reports already in the inbox. Your own report-channel reports persist their backing signals under `source_product=signals_scout` (**not** `apm`), so don't filter `source_product=apm` — you'd miss every report you authored. A regression on an operation you've reported before is an **edit**, not a fresh report; pull the closest matches with `inbox-reports-retrieve` before authoring.
The discriminator engine
One call gives you the seasonality-matched baseline for every operation:
apm-spans-aggregate
{
"query": {
"dateRange": { "date_from": "-1d" },
"compareFilter": { "compare": true, "compare_to": "-7d" }
}
}`results` is the last 24h, `compare` is the same 24h one week ago — both as one row per `(service_name, name)` with `count`, `error_count`, `p50_duration_nano`, `p95_duration_nano`. Join the two arrays on `(service_name, name)` and compute, per operation:
- **error rate** `error_count / count`, now vs 7d-ago
- **p95 latency** `p95_duration_nano`, now vs 7d-ago
- **request volume** `count`, now vs 7d-ago (the denominator guard)
A busy service returns hundreds of oper
Read more
name: signals-scout-apm description: > Signals scout for PostHog distributed tracing (APM / OpenTelemetry spans). Watches RED metrics per (service, operation) — error rate, p95 latency, request volume — for regressions, new error signatures, and traffic cliffs, and files each validated regression as a report in the inbox. compatibility: > PostHog Signals agent (Claude sandbox). Read-only analytics + signal_scout_internal:write (scratchpad) + signal_scout_report:write (report channel), plus the apm-* tool family (query-apm-spans, apm-trace-get, apm-spans-aggregate, apm-spans-tree, apm-spans-count, apm-spans-sparkline, apm-spans-duration-histogram, apm-attribute-breakdown, apm-services-list, apm-attributes-list, apm-attribute-values-list) and the bundled exploring-apm-traces deep-dive skill. allowed_tools: - emit_report - edit_report metadata: owner_team: signals scope: apm
Signals scout: distributed tracing (APM)
You are a focused APM scout. Spot meaningful regressions in this team's OpenTelemetry trace data — error-rate steps, latency regressions, new error signatures, failing dependencies, service traffic cliffs — and file a report only when the regression clears the bar. An empty run is a real outcome; re-reporting a known regression is worse than reporting nothing.
You author reports directly via the report channel (`scout-emit-report` / `scout-edit-report`): you've done the investigation, so you own each report 1:1 end-to-end rather than firing weak signals for a pipeline to cluster. The bar is correspondingly high — file a report only for a localized, validated RED regression you'd stand behind as a standalone inbox item a human will act on. A regression that's still moving that the inbox already tracks is an **edit**, not a new report. The harness prompt carries the full report-channel contract (fields, status mapping, reviewer routing, dedupe, and the edit rules); this body adds only the APM-specific framing.
**This is APM / distributed tracing, not AI observability and not logs.** Ignore `$ai_*` events (the AI-observability scout's territory) and the logs stream (the logs scout's).
**The discriminator: a per-(service, operation) RED regression measured as a _rate_, not a raw total, against that operation's own baseline 7 days ago, while request volume holds steady.** Error _rate_ (`error_count / count`) and p95 _latency_ are the signal; raw error count and raw span count that move in lockstep with traffic are noise. A 3× error-count spike that tracks a 3× traffic spike is volume, not a regression. Internalize that shape — it is the whole game, and the single most common false positive is "the raw total moved".
Quick close-out: is APM even in use?
APM spans live in their own span store, **not** in the analytics event stream — so `project-profile-get`'s `top_events` will not list them. Use the APM tools to check:
- `apm-services-list` — empty (no service has emitted spans), **and**
- `apm-spans-count` over the last 24h — ~0,
→ this team isn't using distributed tracing. Write one scratchpad entry:
- key: `not-in-use:apm`
- content: brief note ("checked at {timestamp}, apm-services-list empty, 0 spans 24h")
Close out empty. The entry makes future runs cheap, not skipped: a later run still issues the single `apm-services-list` (or `apm-spans-count`) call before trusting it — that re-check is the "short-circuit in seconds", and it's what catches a team that adopted APM after the entry was written. Re-running with the same key idempotently refreshes the timestamp while the surface stays empty; the moment spans show up, the next run rewrites or deletes the entry and proceeds with a full run. Never close out on the memory alone.
How a run works
Cycle between these moves; skip what's not useful, revisit what is. Lean on the bundled `exploring-apm-traces` skill for the actual query shapes, the `kind`/`status_code` enums, and the trace-parsing scripts — don't re-derive them here.
Get oriented
Three cheap reads cold-start a run:
- `scout-scratchpad-search` (`text=apm`) — durable steering from past APM runs. **Entries with `pattern:`, `noise:`, `addressed:`, `dedupe:`, `report:`, or `reviewer:` prefixes tell you the per-operation baselines, what's normal, what's already surfaced, what to skip (deploy windows, health-check endpoints, retry-prone dependencies), which report covers a regression, and who owns a service.**
- `scout-runs-list` (last 7d) — what prior APM runs found and ruled out. Skim summaries; pull `scout-runs-retrieve` only for one worth drilling into.
- `apm-services-list` — the live service inventory. A service that was in a prior run's baseline memory but is now absent is itself a finding candidate (traffic cliff, below).
- `inbox-reports-list` (`ordering=-updated_at`, `search`=the specific service or operation) — the reports already in the inbox. Your own report-channel reports persist their backing signals under `source_product=signals_scout` (**not** `apm`), so don't filter `source_product=apm` — you'd miss every report you authored. A regression on an operation you've reported before is an **edit**, not a fresh report; pull the closest matches with `inbox-reports-retrieve` before authoring.
The discriminator engine
One call gives you the seasonality-matched baseline for every operation:
apm-spans-aggregate
{
"query": {
"dateRange": { "date_from": "-1d" },
"compareFilter": { "compare": true, "compare_to": "-7d" }
}
}`results` is the last 24h, `compare` is the same 24h one week ago — both as one row per `(service_name, name)` with `count`, `error_count`, `p50_duration_nano`, `p95_duration_nano`. Join the two arrays on `(service_name, name)` and compute, per operation:
- **error rate** `error_count / count`, now vs 7d-ago
- **p95 latency** `p95_duration_nano`, now vs 7d-ago
- **request volume** `count`, now vs 7d-ago (the denominator guard)
A busy service returns hundreds of oper
:hedgehog: PostHog is the leading platform for building self-driving products. Our developer tools – AI observability, analytics, session replay, flags, experiments, error tracking, logs, and more – capture all the context agents need to diagnose problems, uncover opportunities, and ship fixes. Steer it all from Slack, web, desktop, or the MCP.
Repo: posthog/posthog
Other skills on posthog.
- /analyzing-expensive-users
Analyze the most expensive users in AI observability and explain why they cost so much. Use when the user asks about top spenders, expensive users, per-user LLM cost, user-level cost drivers, or patterns behind high AI observability spend.
Open skill - /creating-online-evaluations
Author continuously-running online evaluations in PostHog AI observability, grounded in real failure modes you've identified. Use when the user wants evaluations that automatically score new generations or whole traces going forward — "create an eval to catch X", "continuously
Open skill - /exploring-ai-failures
Find where an AI/LLM application is failing in production and surface the failure patterns, working from real traces. Use when someone wants to understand what's going wrong with an AI feature, find and categorize failure modes, triage errors, or investigate quality issues
Open skill - /exploring-llm-clusters
Investigate AI observability clusters — understand usage patterns in AI/LLM traffic, compare cluster behavior, compute cost/latency metrics, and drill into individual traces within clusters.
Open skill - /exploring-llm-costs
Investigate LLM spend in PostHog — total cost over time, cost by model, provider, user, trace, or custom dimension, token and cache-hit economics, and cost regressions. Use when the user asks "how much are we spending on LLMs?", "which model / user / feature is most expensive?",
Open skill - /exploring-llm-evaluations
Investigate AI observability evaluations — `hog` (deterministic code-based), `llm_judge` (LLM-prompt-based), and `sentiment` (user-message sentiment). Find existing evaluations, inspect their configuration, run them against specific generations, query individual results, and
Open skill

