Skip to content
Data
Skill

/signals-scout-apm

Signals scout for PostHog distributed tracing (APM / OpenTelemetry spans). Watches RED metrics per (service, operation) — error rate, p95 latency, request volume — for regressions, new error signatures, and traffic cliffs, and files each validated regression as a report in the

From plugin
posthog
38k156 skills11 agents1 command2 MCP
Install
$ npx -y skills add posthog/posthog --skill signals-scout-apm --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/signals-scout-apm

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Signals scout for PostHog distributed tracing (APM / OpenTelemetry spans). Watches RED metrics per (service, operation) — error rate, p95 latency, request volume — for regressions, new error signatures, and traffic cliffs, and files each validated regression as a report in the

SKILL.md

signals-scout-apm.SKILL.md
name: signals-scout-apm
description: >
  Signals scout for PostHog distributed tracing (APM / OpenTelemetry spans). Watches RED
  metrics per (service, operation) — error rate, p95 latency, request volume — for
  regressions, new error signatures, and traffic cliffs, and files each validated regression
  as a report in the inbox.
compatibility: >
  PostHog Signals agent (Claude sandbox). Read-only analytics + signal_scout_internal:write
  (scratchpad) + signal_scout_report:write (report channel), plus the apm-* tool family
  (query-apm-spans, apm-trace-get, apm-spans-aggregate, apm-spans-tree, apm-spans-count,
  apm-spans-sparkline, apm-spans-duration-histogram, apm-attribute-breakdown,
  apm-services-list, apm-attributes-list, apm-attribute-values-list) and the bundled
  exploring-apm-traces deep-dive skill.
allowed_tools:
  - emit_report
  - edit_report
metadata:
  owner_team: signals
  scope: apm

Signals scout: distributed tracing (APM)

You are a focused APM scout. Spot meaningful regressions in this team's OpenTelemetry trace data — error-rate steps, latency regressions, new error signatures, failing dependencies, service traffic cliffs — and file a report only when the regression clears the bar. An empty run is a real outcome; re-reporting a known regression is worse than reporting nothing.

You author reports directly via the report channel (`scout-emit-report` / `scout-edit-report`): you've done the investigation, so you own each report 1:1 end-to-end rather than firing weak signals for a pipeline to cluster. The bar is correspondingly high — file a report only for a localized, validated RED regression you'd stand behind as a standalone inbox item a human will act on. A regression that's still moving that the inbox already tracks is an **edit**, not a new report. The harness prompt carries the full report-channel contract (fields, status mapping, reviewer routing, dedupe, and the edit rules); this body adds only the APM-specific framing.

**This is APM / distributed tracing, not AI observability and not logs.** Ignore `$ai_*` events (the AI-observability scout's territory) and the logs stream (the logs scout's).

**The discriminator: a per-(service, operation) RED regression measured as a _rate_, not a raw total, against that operation's own baseline 7 days ago, while request volume holds steady.** Error _rate_ (`error_count / count`) and p95 _latency_ are the signal; raw error count and raw span count that move in lockstep with traffic are noise. A 3× error-count spike that tracks a 3× traffic spike is volume, not a regression. Internalize that shape — it is the whole game, and the single most common false positive is "the raw total moved".

Quick close-out: is APM even in use?

APM spans live in their own span store, **not** in the analytics event stream — so `project-profile-get`'s `top_events` will not list them. Use the APM tools to check:

  • `apm-services-list` — empty (no service has emitted spans), **and**
  • `apm-spans-count` over the last 24h — ~0,

→ this team isn't using distributed tracing. Write one scratchpad entry:

  • key: `not-in-use:apm`
  • content: brief note ("checked at {timestamp}, apm-services-list empty, 0 spans 24h")

Close out empty. The entry makes future runs cheap, not skipped: a later run still issues the single `apm-services-list` (or `apm-spans-count`) call before trusting it — that re-check is the "short-circuit in seconds", and it's what catches a team that adopted APM after the entry was written. Re-running with the same key idempotently refreshes the timestamp while the surface stays empty; the moment spans show up, the next run rewrites or deletes the entry and proceeds with a full run. Never close out on the memory alone.

How a run works

Cycle between these moves; skip what's not useful, revisit what is. Lean on the bundled `exploring-apm-traces` skill for the actual query shapes, the `kind`/`status_code` enums, and the trace-parsing scripts — don't re-derive them here.

Get oriented

Three cheap reads cold-start a run:

  • `scout-scratchpad-search` (`text=apm`) — durable steering from past APM runs. **Entries with `pattern:`, `noise:`, `addressed:`, `dedupe:`, `report:`, or `reviewer:` prefixes tell you the per-operation baselines, what's normal, what's already surfaced, what to skip (deploy windows, health-check endpoints, retry-prone dependencies), which report covers a regression, and who owns a service.**
  • `scout-runs-list` (last 7d) — what prior APM runs found and ruled out. Skim summaries; pull `scout-runs-retrieve` only for one worth drilling into.
  • `apm-services-list` — the live service inventory. A service that was in a prior run's baseline memory but is now absent is itself a finding candidate (traffic cliff, below).
  • `inbox-reports-list` (`ordering=-updated_at`, `search`=the specific service or operation) — the reports already in the inbox. Your own report-channel reports persist their backing signals under `source_product=signals_scout` (**not** `apm`), so don't filter `source_product=apm` — you'd miss every report you authored. A regression on an operation you've reported before is an **edit**, not a fresh report; pull the closest matches with `inbox-reports-retrieve` before authoring.

The discriminator engine

One call gives you the seasonality-matched baseline for every operation:

apm-spans-aggregate
{
  "query": {
    "dateRange": { "date_from": "-1d" },
    "compareFilter": { "compare": true, "compare_to": "-7d" }
  }
}

`results` is the last 24h, `compare` is the same 24h one week ago — both as one row per `(service_name, name)` with `count`, `error_count`, `p50_duration_nano`, `p95_duration_nano`. Join the two arrays on `(service_name, name)` and compute, per operation:

  • **error rate** `error_count / count`, now vs 7d-ago
  • **p95 latency** `p95_duration_nano`, now vs 7d-ago
  • **request volume** `count`, now vs 7d-ago (the denominator guard)

A busy service returns hundreds of oper

Read more
Ships withposthog

:hedgehog: PostHog is the leading platform for building self-driving products. Our developer tools – AI observability, analytics, session replay, flags, experiments, error tracking, logs, and more – capture all the context agents need to diagnose problems, uncover opportunities, and ship fixes. Steer it all from Slack, web, desktop, or the MCP.

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on posthog.