mcp-servers
Install, configure, authenticate, and troubleshoot MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers for this agent. Use when the user asks to…
Find the events and person properties that correlate with funnel conversion or drop-off. Use when the user asks why people convert or drop off in a funnel, what converters do differently, which events or properties predict success or failure, or asks for "correlation analysis"
$ npx -y skills add posthog/posthog --skill analyzing-funnel-correlation --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/analyzing-funnel-correlationContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Find the events and person properties that correlate with funnel conversion or drop-off. Use when the user asks why people convert or drop off in a funnel, what converters do differently, which events or properties predict success or failure, or asks for "correlation analysis"
name: analyzing-funnel-correlation description: > Find the events and person properties that correlate with funnel conversion or drop-off. Use when the user asks why people convert or drop off in a funnel, what converters do differently, which events or properties predict success or failure, or asks for "correlation analysis" on a funnel. Computes odds ratios with HogQL, because PostHog has no built-in funnel correlation view.
Correlation compares two groups of people who entered a funnel: people who completed the last step (success) and people who did not (failure). For each candidate event or property value, build a contingency table and compute the odds ratio. An odds ratio above 1 means the signal goes with conversion. Below 1 means it goes with drop-off. The further the ratio is from 1, the stronger the correlation.
Correlation is not causation. Tell the user that, and suggest an experiment to test a strong signal.
1. Get the funnel definition: the step events, the date range, and the conversion window. If the user names a saved insight, read it with `insight-get`. Confirm the step events with `read-data-schema`. 2. Run the funnel with `query-funnel` and note the total entrants and converters. The SQL below must give totals in the same range. If not, fix the step filters first. 3. Run the event correlation query below with `execute-sql`. 4. If the user asks about person attributes, run the property variant. 5. Report the top success signals and the top failure signals with their counts. To show who is behind a signal, use `query-funnel-actors` or filter the funnel by that event or property.
Replace the step events, the date range, the conversion window (seconds in `windowFunnel`, days in the `INTERVAL`), and the step count. Add more `event = '...'` conditions to `windowFunnel` for more steps, and set `steps = N` to the last step.
WITH
funnel_actors AS (
SELECT
person_id AS actor_id,
windowFunnel(1209600)(toDateTime(timestamp), event = 'step one', event = 'step two') AS steps,
arraySort(groupArrayIf((toUnixTimestamp(timestamp), event = 'step two'), event IN ('step one', 'step two'))) AS step_events,
arrayReverseFill(t -> t > 0, arrayMap(x -> if(x.2, x.1, 0), step_events)) AS next_final,
arrayFirstIndex((x, t) -> NOT x.2 AND t > 0 AND t <= x.1 + 1209600, step_events, next_final) AS attempt,
toDateTime(if(attempt > 0, step_events[attempt].1, arrayFirst(x -> NOT x.2, step_events).1)) AS first_timestamp,
toDateTime(next_final[greatest(attempt, 1)]) AS final_timestamp
FROM events
WHERE event IN ('step one', 'step two')
AND timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 30 DAY
GROUP BY actor_id
HAVING steps >= 1
),
totals AS (
SELECT countIf(steps = 2) AS success_total, countIf(steps < 2) AS failure_total
FROM funnel_actors
),
per_event AS (
SELECT
e.event AS name,
countDistinctIf(a.actor_id, a.steps = 2) AS success_count,
countDistinctIf(a.actor_id, a.steps < 2) AS failure_count
FROM events AS e
JOIN funnel_actors AS a ON e.person_id = a.actor_id
WHERE e.timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 30 DAY
AND e.timestamp > a.first_timestamp
AND e.timestamp < if(a.steps = 2, a.final_timestamp, a.first_timestamp + INTERVAL 14 DAY)
AND e.event NOT IN ('step one', 'step two')
GROUP BY name
)
SELECT
name,
success_count,
failure_count,
success_total,
failure_total,
((success_count + 1) * (failure_total - failure_count + 1))
/ ((success_total - success_count + 1) * (failure_count + 1)) AS odds_ratio
FROM per_event
CROSS JOIN totals
WHERE success_count + failure_count >= least(25, 0.02 * (success_total + failure_total))
ORDER BY abs(log(odds_ratio)) DESC
LIMIT 20The query only counts events between funnel entry and conversion. `step_events` holds the first-step and last-step events in time order. `next_final` gives the next last-step time for each of them in one pass. For people who converted, `attempt` picks the first entry that has a last step inside the window, so both timestamps come from the same attempt. For more steps, keep only the first and last step events in `groupArrayIf`. The attempt then ignores the middle steps, so the interval can start at an earlier entry than the one that converted. For people who did not convert, it counts events from their first entry until the conversion window closes. The timestamps use whole seconds because `windowFunnel` compares whole seconds. Keep them the same, or some converters get no matched attempt. It excludes the funnel step events, because they correlate with conversion by definition.
To compare person property values, group the actors by the property and skip the events join.
WITH
funnel_actors AS (
SELECT
person_id AS actor_id,
windowFunnel(1209600)(toDateTime(timestamp), event = 'step one', event = 'step two') AS steps,
any(person.properties.$browser) AS value
FROM events
WHERE event IN ('step one', 'step two')
AND timestamp >= now() - INTERVAL 30 DAY
GROUP BY actor_id
HAVING steps >= 1
),
totals AS (
SELECT countIf(steps = 2) AS success_total, countIf(steps < 2) AS failure_total
FROM funnel_actors
),
per_value AS (
SELECT
toString(value) AS name,
countIf(steps = 2) AS success_count,
countIf(steps < 2) AS failure_count
FROM funnel_actors
GROUP BY name
)
SELECT
name,
success_count,
failure_count,
((success_count + 1) * (failure_total - failure_count + 1))
/ ((success_total - success_count + 1) * (failure_cou:hedgehog: PostHog is the leading platform for building self-driving products. Our developer tools – AI observability, analytics, session replay, flags, experiments, error tracking, logs, and more – capture all the context agents need to diagnose problems, uncover opportunities, and ship fixes. Steer it all from Slack, web, desktop, or the MCP.
Install, configure, authenticate, and troubleshoot MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers for this agent. Use when the user asks to…
Designs and runs task-specific JavaScript harnesses with the `workflow` tool. Use for broad, long-running, highly structured, or…
How and when to delegate work to subagents via the `subagent` tool (Explore, Plan, General). Use when a task involves codebase…
Explains what a member or a role can do in a PostHog project, using the access control MCP tools. Use when the user asks what…
Analyze the most expensive users in AI observability and explain why they cost so much. Use when the user asks about top…
Inspect and compare offline AI evaluation experiments, diagnose case-level regressions, and follow scorer history across…