bias-detection-design
Designing review workflows to surface and mitigate bias in AI outputs.
User correction, thumbs up/down, inline editing, and reinforcement signals.
$ npx -y skills add owl-listener/ai-design-skills --skill feedback-loops --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/feedback-loopsContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
User correction, thumbs up/down, inline editing, and reinforcement signals.
name: feedback-loops description: User correction, thumbs up/down, inline editing, and reinforcement signals.
Feedback loops are how users tell the AI what's working and what isn't. Designing these loops well is the difference between an AI that improves over time and one that repeats the same mistakes.
The most valuable feedback is correction — but it's also the hardest to design for:
When to ask for feedback matters:
Design for ambient feedback first. Add explicit feedback sparingly.
Feedback is only valuable if it changes something. The user needs to see that their feedback matters:
Part of the Designer Skills suite. Install this collection and four more with one command in Claude Code: /plugin marketplace add Owl-Listener/designer-skills This repo still works on its own. The suite just gives everyone one front door.
Designing review workflows to surface and mitigate bias in AI outputs.
Designing for informed user consent, opt-out, and human override.
When and how AI should escalate to humans, refuse, or ask for clarification.
Defining behavioral boundaries — what the AI should and shouldn't do.
Proactively identifying failure modes, misuse, and unintended consequences.
Showing users what the AI knows, doesn't know, and how confident it is.