/grpo-rl-training
Expert guidance for GRPO/RL fine-tuning with TRL for reasoning and task-specific model training
$ npx -y skills add OpenLAIR/dr-claw --skill grpo-rl-training --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
- Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
- You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
- Slash command
/grpo-rl-training
Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Expert guidance for GRPO/RL fine-tuning with TRL for reasoning and task-specific model training
SKILL.md
grpo-rl-training.SKILL.mdname: grpo-rl-training
description: Expert guidance for GRPO/RL fine-tuning with TRL for reasoning and task-specific model training
version: 1.0.0
author: Orchestra Research
license: MIT
tags: [Post-Training, Reinforcement Learning, GRPO, TRL, RLHF, Reward Modeling, Reasoning, DPO, PPO, Structured Output]
dependencies: [transformers>=4.47.0, trl>=0.14.0, datasets>=3.2.0, peft>=0.14.0, torch]
GRPO/RL Training with TRL
Expert-level guidance for implementing Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) using the Transformer Reinforcement Learning (TRL) library. This skill provides battle-tested patterns, critical insights, and production-ready workflows for fine-tuning language models with custom reward functions.
When to Use This Skill
Use GRPO training when you need to:
- **Enforce specific output formats** (e.g., XML tags, JSON, structured reasoning)
- **Teach verifiable tasks** with objective correctness metrics (math, coding, fact-checking)
- **Improve reasoning capabilities** by rewarding chain-of-thought patterns
- **Align models to domain-specific behaviors** without labeled preference data
- **Optimize for multiple objectives** simultaneously (format + correctness + style)
**Do NOT use GRPO for:**
- Simple supervised fine-tuning tasks (use SFT instead)
- Tasks without clear reward signals
- When you already have high-quality preference pairs (use DPO/PPO instead)
---
Core Concepts
1. GRPO Algorithm Fundamentals
**Key Mechanism:**
- Generates **multiple completions** for each prompt (group size: 4-16)
- Compares completions within each group using reward functions
- Updates policy to favor higher-rewarded responses relative to the group
**Critical Difference from PPO:**
- No separate reward model needed
- More sample-efficient (learns from within-group comparisons)
- Simpler to implement and debug
**Mathematical Intuition:**
For each prompt p:
1. Generate N completions: {c₁, c₂, ..., cₙ}
2. Compute rewards: {r₁, r₂, ..., rₙ}
3. Learn to increase probability of high-reward completions
relative to low-reward ones in the same group2. Reward Function Design Philosophy
**Golden Rules:** 1. **Compose multiple reward functions** - Each handles one aspect (format, correctness, style) 2. **Scale rewards appropriately** - Higher weight = stronger signal 3. **Use incremental rewards** - Partial credit for partial compliance 4. **Test rewards independently** - Debug each reward function in isolation
**Reward Function Types:**
| Type | Use Case | Example Weight | |------|----------|----------------| | **Correctness** | Verifiable tasks (math, code) | 2.0 (highest) | | **Format** | Strict structure enforcement | 0.5-1.0 | | **Length** | Encourage verbosity/conciseness | 0.1-0.5 | | **Style** | Penalize unwanted patterns | -0.5 to 0.5 |
---
Implementation Workflow
Step 1: Dataset Preparation
**Critical Requirements:**
- Prompts in chat format (list of dicts with 'role' and 'content')
- Include system prompts to set expectations
- For verifiable tasks, include ground truth answers as additional columns
**Example Structure:**
from datasets import load_dataset, Dataset
SYSTEM_PROMPT = """
Respond in the following format:
<reasoning>
[Your step-by-step thinking]
</reasoning>
<answer>
[Final answer]
</answer>
"""
def prepare_dataset(raw_data):
"""
Transform raw data into GRPO-compatible format.
Returns: Dataset with columns:
- 'prompt': List[Dict] with role/content (system + user messages)
- 'answer': str (ground truth, optional but recommended)
"""
return raw_data.map(lambda x: {
'prompt': [
{'role': 'system', 'content': SYSTEM_PROMPT},
{'role': 'user', 'content': x['question']}
],
'answer': extract_answer(x['raw_answer'])
})**Pro Tips:**
- Use one-shot or few-shot examples in system prompt for complex formats
- Keep prompts concise (max_prompt_length: 256-512 tokens)
- Validate data quality before training (garbage in = garbage out)
Step 2: Reward Function Implementation
**Template Structure:**
def reward_function_name(
prompts, # List[List[Dict]]: Original prompts
completions, # List[List[Dict]]: Model generations
answer=None, # Optional: Ground truth from dataset
**kwargs # Additional dataset columns
) -> list[float]:
"""
Evaluate completions and return rewards.
Returns: List of floats (one per completion)
"""
# Extract completion text
responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
# Compute rewards
rewards = []
for response in responses:
score = compute_score(response)
rewards.append(score)
return rewards**Example 1: Correctness Reward (Math/Coding)**
def correctness_reward(prompts, completions, answer, **kwargs):
"""Reward correct answers with high score."""
responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
extracted = [extract_final_answer(r) for r in responses]
return [2.0 if ans == gt else 0.0
for ans, gt in zip(extracted, answer)]**Example 2: Format Reward (Structured Output)**
import re
def format_reward(completions, **kwargs):
"""Reward XML-like structured format."""
pattern = r'<reasoning>.*?</reasoning>\s*<answer>.*?</answer>'
responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
return [1.0 if re.search(pattern, r, re.DOTALL) else 0.0
for r in responses]**Example 3: Incremental Format Reward (Partial Credit)**
def incremental_format_reward(completions, **kwargs):
"""Award partial credit for format compliance."""
responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
rewards = []
for r in responses:
score = 0.0
if '<reasoning>' in r:
score += 0.25
if '</reasoning>' in r:
score += 0.25
if '<answer>' in r:
scoRead more
name: grpo-rl-training description: Expert guidance for GRPO/RL fine-tuning with TRL for reasoning and task-specific model training version: 1.0.0 author: Orchestra Research license: MIT tags: [Post-Training, Reinforcement Learning, GRPO, TRL, RLHF, Reward Modeling, Reasoning, DPO, PPO, Structured Output] dependencies: [transformers>=4.47.0, trl>=0.14.0, datasets>=3.2.0, peft>=0.14.0, torch]
GRPO/RL Training with TRL
Expert-level guidance for implementing Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) using the Transformer Reinforcement Learning (TRL) library. This skill provides battle-tested patterns, critical insights, and production-ready workflows for fine-tuning language models with custom reward functions.
When to Use This Skill
Use GRPO training when you need to:
- **Enforce specific output formats** (e.g., XML tags, JSON, structured reasoning)
- **Teach verifiable tasks** with objective correctness metrics (math, coding, fact-checking)
- **Improve reasoning capabilities** by rewarding chain-of-thought patterns
- **Align models to domain-specific behaviors** without labeled preference data
- **Optimize for multiple objectives** simultaneously (format + correctness + style)
**Do NOT use GRPO for:**
- Simple supervised fine-tuning tasks (use SFT instead)
- Tasks without clear reward signals
- When you already have high-quality preference pairs (use DPO/PPO instead)
---
Core Concepts
1. GRPO Algorithm Fundamentals
**Key Mechanism:**
- Generates **multiple completions** for each prompt (group size: 4-16)
- Compares completions within each group using reward functions
- Updates policy to favor higher-rewarded responses relative to the group
**Critical Difference from PPO:**
- No separate reward model needed
- More sample-efficient (learns from within-group comparisons)
- Simpler to implement and debug
**Mathematical Intuition:**
For each prompt p:
1. Generate N completions: {c₁, c₂, ..., cₙ}
2. Compute rewards: {r₁, r₂, ..., rₙ}
3. Learn to increase probability of high-reward completions
relative to low-reward ones in the same group2. Reward Function Design Philosophy
**Golden Rules:** 1. **Compose multiple reward functions** - Each handles one aspect (format, correctness, style) 2. **Scale rewards appropriately** - Higher weight = stronger signal 3. **Use incremental rewards** - Partial credit for partial compliance 4. **Test rewards independently** - Debug each reward function in isolation
**Reward Function Types:**
| Type | Use Case | Example Weight | |------|----------|----------------| | **Correctness** | Verifiable tasks (math, code) | 2.0 (highest) | | **Format** | Strict structure enforcement | 0.5-1.0 | | **Length** | Encourage verbosity/conciseness | 0.1-0.5 | | **Style** | Penalize unwanted patterns | -0.5 to 0.5 |
---
Implementation Workflow
Step 1: Dataset Preparation
**Critical Requirements:**
- Prompts in chat format (list of dicts with 'role' and 'content')
- Include system prompts to set expectations
- For verifiable tasks, include ground truth answers as additional columns
**Example Structure:**
from datasets import load_dataset, Dataset
SYSTEM_PROMPT = """
Respond in the following format:
<reasoning>
[Your step-by-step thinking]
</reasoning>
<answer>
[Final answer]
</answer>
"""
def prepare_dataset(raw_data):
"""
Transform raw data into GRPO-compatible format.
Returns: Dataset with columns:
- 'prompt': List[Dict] with role/content (system + user messages)
- 'answer': str (ground truth, optional but recommended)
"""
return raw_data.map(lambda x: {
'prompt': [
{'role': 'system', 'content': SYSTEM_PROMPT},
{'role': 'user', 'content': x['question']}
],
'answer': extract_answer(x['raw_answer'])
})**Pro Tips:**
- Use one-shot or few-shot examples in system prompt for complex formats
- Keep prompts concise (max_prompt_length: 256-512 tokens)
- Validate data quality before training (garbage in = garbage out)
Step 2: Reward Function Implementation
**Template Structure:**
def reward_function_name(
prompts, # List[List[Dict]]: Original prompts
completions, # List[List[Dict]]: Model generations
answer=None, # Optional: Ground truth from dataset
**kwargs # Additional dataset columns
) -> list[float]:
"""
Evaluate completions and return rewards.
Returns: List of floats (one per completion)
"""
# Extract completion text
responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
# Compute rewards
rewards = []
for response in responses:
score = compute_score(response)
rewards.append(score)
return rewards**Example 1: Correctness Reward (Math/Coding)**
def correctness_reward(prompts, completions, answer, **kwargs):
"""Reward correct answers with high score."""
responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
extracted = [extract_final_answer(r) for r in responses]
return [2.0 if ans == gt else 0.0
for ans, gt in zip(extracted, answer)]**Example 2: Format Reward (Structured Output)**
import re
def format_reward(completions, **kwargs):
"""Reward XML-like structured format."""
pattern = r'<reasoning>.*?</reasoning>\s*<answer>.*?</answer>'
responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
return [1.0 if re.search(pattern, r, re.DOTALL) else 0.0
for r in responses]**Example 3: Incremental Format Reward (Partial Credit)**
def incremental_format_reward(completions, **kwargs):
"""Award partial credit for format compliance."""
responses = [comp[0]['content'] for comp in completions]
rewards = []
for r in responses:
score = 0.0
if '<reasoning>' in r:
score += 0.25
if '</reasoning>' in r:
score += 0.25
if '<answer>' in r:
scoA Super AI Lab with massive AI Doctors as Assistants. Best IDE for Research via AI Power.
Repo: OpenLAIR/dr-claw
Other skills on dr-claw.
- /dr-claw
Dr. Claw skill for OpenClaw project discovery, idea intake, waiting-session triage, structured session control, event-driven notifications, and mobile reporting through the local drclaw CLI.
Open skill - /academic-researcher
Academic research assistant for literature reviews, paper analysis, and scholarly writing. Use when: reviewing academic papers, conducting literature reviews, writing research summaries, analyzing methodologies, formatting citations, or when user mentions academic research,
Open skill - /autogpt
Autonomous AI agent platform for building and deploying continuous agents. Use when creating visual workflow agents, deploying persistent autonomous agents, or building complex multi-step AI automation systems.
Open skill - /crewai
Multi-agent orchestration framework for autonomous AI collaboration. Use when building teams of specialized agents working together on complex tasks, when you need role-based agent collaboration with memory, or for production workflows requiring sequential/hierarchical
Open skill - /langchain
Framework for building LLM-powered applications with agents, chains, and RAG. Supports multiple providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), 500+ integrations, ReAct agents, tool calling, memory management, and vector store retrieval. Use for building chatbots, question-answering
Open skill - /llamaindex
Data framework for building LLM applications with RAG. Specializes in document ingestion (300+ connectors), indexing, and querying. Features vector indices, query engines, agents, and multi-modal support. Use for document Q&A, chatbots, knowledge retrieval, or building RAG
Open skill

