agent-browser
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling…
Analytical thinking patterns for comprehensive evaluation, code audits, security analysis, and performance reviews. Provides structured templates for thorough investigation with extended thinking support.
Claude Code
$ npx -y skills add nicepkg/auto-company --skill deep-analysis --agent claude-code
Codex
$ npx skills add nicepkg/auto-company --skill deep-analysis -a codex -y
Cursor
$ npx skills add nicepkg/auto-company --skill deep-analysis -a cursor -y
Gemini CLI
$ npx skills add nicepkg/auto-company --skill deep-analysis -a gemini-cli -y
GitHub Copilot
$ npx skills add nicepkg/auto-company --skill deep-analysis -a github-copilot -y
OpenCode
$ npx skills add nicepkg/auto-company --skill deep-analysis -a opencode -y
Windsurf
$ npx skills add nicepkg/auto-company --skill deep-analysis -a windsurf -y
name: deep-analysis description: Analytical thinking patterns for comprehensive evaluation, code audits, security analysis, and performance reviews. Provides structured templates for thorough investigation with extended thinking support. allowed-tools: - Bash - Read - Write - Edit - Glob - Grep - Task - WebFetch - WebSearch dependencies: - extended-thinking - complex-reasoning triggers: - analyze - audit - review - assess - evaluate - investigate - deep dive - comprehensive review - security analysis - performance analysis - code audit
Comprehensive analytical templates for thorough investigation, audits, and evaluations leveraging extended thinking capabilities.
## Code Audit Report **Repository**: [repo-name] **Scope**: [files/modules audited] **Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD] **Auditor**: Claude + [Human reviewer] ### Executive Summary [2-3 sentence overview of findings] ### Audit Criteria - [ ] Code quality and maintainability - [ ] Security vulnerabilities - [ ] Performance concerns - [ ] Test coverage - [ ] Documentation completeness - [ ] Dependency health ### Critical Findings | ID | Severity | Location | Issue | Recommendation | |----|----------|----------|-------|----------------| | C1 | Critical | file:line | [Issue] | [Fix] | | C2 | Critical | file:line | [Issue] | [Fix] | ### High Priority Findings | ID | Severity | Location | Issue | Recommendation | |----|----------|----------|-------|----------------| | H1 | High | file:line | [Issue] | [Fix] | ### Medium Priority Findings [...] ### Low Priority / Suggestions [...] ### Metrics | Metric | Value | Target | Status | |--------|-------|--------|--------| | Test Coverage | 75% | 80% | ⚠️ | | Cyclomatic Complexity | 12 | <10 | ⚠️ | | Technical Debt | 4.2d | <3d | ❌ | | Security Score | 8/10 | 9/10 | ⚠️ | ### Recommendations 1. **Immediate**: [Critical fixes] 2. **Short-term**: [Within sprint] 3. **Long-term**: [Tech debt reduction] ### Sign-off - [ ] All critical issues addressed - [ ] High priority issues have timeline - [ ] Audit findings documented in backlog
## Threat Model: [System/Component Name] **Version**: [1.0] **Last Updated**: [YYYY-MM-DD] **Classification**: [Internal/Confidential] ### System Overview [Brief description of the system being modeled] ### Assets | Asset | Description | Sensitivity | Owner | |-------|-------------|-------------|-------| | User Data | PII, credentials | Critical | Auth Team | | API Keys | Service credentials | High | DevOps | | Business Data | Transactions | High | Product | ### Trust Boundaries
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ External (Untrusted) │ │ [Internet Users] [Third-party APIs] │ └──────────────────┬──────────────────────┘ │ WAF/Load Balancer ┌──────────────────┴──────────────────────┐ │ DMZ (Semi-trusted) │ │ [API Gateway] [CDN] [Public Services] │ └──────────────────┬──────────────────────┘ │ Internal Firewall ┌──────────────────┴──────────────────────┐ │ Internal (Trusted) │ │ [App Servers] [Databases] [Queues] │ └─────────────────────────────────────────┘
### Threat Categories (STRIDE) #### Spoofing | Threat | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | |--------|------------|--------|------------| | Credential theft | Medium | High | MFA, rate limiting | | Session hijacking | Low | High | Secure cookies, HTTPS | #### Tampering | Threat | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | |--------|------------|--------|------------| | SQL injection | Medium | Critical | Parameterized queries | | Data modification | Low | High | Integrity checks | #### Repudiation [...] #### Information Disclosure [...] #### Denial of Service [...] #### Elevation of Privilege [...] ### Attack Vectors 1. **Vector 1**: [Description] - Entry point: [Where] - Technique: [How] - Mitigation: [Defense] ### Risk Matrix | Threat | Likelihood | Impact | Risk Score | Priority | |--------|------------|--------|------------|----------| | T1 | High | Critical | 9 | P1 | | T2 | Medium | High | 6 | P2 | | T3 | Low | Medium | 3 | P3 | ### Security Controls | Control | Type | Status | Coverage | |---------|------|--------|----------| | WAF | Preventive | ✅ Active | External | | SAST | Detective | ✅ CI/CD | Code | | DAST | Detective | ⚠️ Partial | Runtime | | Encryption | Preventive | ✅ Active | Data | ### Recommendations 1. [Priority 1 recommendations] 2. [Priority 2 recommendations] 3. [Priority 3 recommendations]
## Performance Analysis Report **System**: [System name] **Period**: [Date range] **Environment**: [Production/Staging] ### Executive Summary [Key findings and recommendations] ### Performance Metrics #### Response Times | Endpoint | P50 | P95 | P99 | Target | Status | |----------|-----|-----|-----|--------|--------| | /api/users | 45ms | 120ms | 350ms | <200ms | ✅ | | /api/search | 230ms | 890ms | 2.1s | <500ms | ❌ | | /api/reports | 1.2s | 3.4s | 8.2s | <2s | ❌ | #### Throughput | Service | Current RPS | Peak RPS | Capacity | Utilization | |---------|-------------|----------|----------|-------------| | API | 1,200 | 2,400 | 5,000 | 48% | | Worker | 500 | 800 | 1,000 | 80% | #### Resource Utilization | Resource | Average | Peak | Threshold | Status | |----------|---------|------|-----------|--------| | CPU | 45% | 78% | 80% | ⚠️ | | Memory | 62% | 85% | 85% | ⚠️ | | Disk I/O | 30% | 55%
全自主 AI 公司,24/7 不停歇运行 14 个 AI Agent,每个都是该领域世界顶级专家的思维分身。 自主构思产品、做决策、写代码、部署上线、搞营销。没有人类参与。 基于 Claude Code Agent Teams 驱动。 ⚠️ 实验项目 — 还在测试中,能跑但不一定稳定。目前仅支持 macOS。
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling…
Security-focused code review checklist and automated scanning patterns. Use when reviewing pull requests for security issues,…
Generate personalized cold email sequences (7-14 emails) with A/B test subject lines, follow-up timing recommendations, and…
Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers…
Use this skill when users need to analyze competitors, monitor market movements, benchmark features/pricing, identify market…
When the user wants to plan a content strategy, decide what content to create, or figure out what topics to cover. Also use when…
Direct browser control via CDP for web interaction: automation, scraping, testing, screenshots, and site/app work. Also covers…
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling…