aar
Conduct a structured debrief to extract learning from any significant event or experience.
Counter confirmation bias by actively seeking evidence that could prove you wrong. Test assumptions before committing.
> /plugin marketplace add neurofoo/agent-skillsHow it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/reality-testContext preview
What this command does when you run it.
Counter confirmation bias by actively seeking evidence that could prove you wrong. Test assumptions before committing.
Counter confirmation bias by actively seeking evidence that could prove you wrong. Test assumptions before committing.
Identify key assumptions underlying your decision and design ways to test them with real data, not just analysis.
**Decision/Belief Being Tested**: [What we're evaluating]
---
**What are you assuming to be true?**
| Assumption | Confidence | Importance | |------------|------------|------------| | [assumption 1] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | | [assumption 2] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | | [assumption 3] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low |
---
For each key assumption, what would convince you it's wrong?
| Assumption | What Would Change My Mind | |------------|--------------------------| | [assumption] | [disconfirming evidence] | | [assumption] | [disconfirming evidence] |
**Deliberately seek disconfirming evidence:** Where can we look for evidence that we're wrong?
---
**What's the general success rate in situations like this?**
| Situation | Base Rate | Source | |-----------|-----------|--------| | [similar situation] | [%] | [where we know this from] |
**Are we assuming we're different from the average?** [Yes/No] If yes, what specifically makes us different?
---
**Can we test this with a small experiment before fully committing?**
| What to Test | The "Ooch" | What We'd Learn | Cost/Time | |--------------|-----------|-----------------|-----------| | [assumption] | [small test] | [insight] | [cost] | | [assumption] | [small test] | [insight] | [cost] |
**Pilot possibility**: [How to test at small scale first]
---
**Who has direct experience with this?**
| Expert/Source | What They'd Know | How to Reach Them | |---------------|------------------|-------------------| | [who] | [their expertise] | [how to contact] |
**What would a skeptic say?** > [The best argument against our current view]
---
| Assumption | Evidence For | Evidence Against | Verdict | |------------|--------------|------------------|---------| | [assumption] | [supporting] | [contradicting] | [likely true/uncertain/likely false] |
---
**Before reality-testing**: [Initial confidence %] **After reality-testing**: [Revised confidence %] **Key change**: [What we learned]
**Next step**: [Action to take based on findings]
$ARGUMENTS
A collection of thinking frameworks and decision-making tools as skills for AI coding assistants.
Conduct a structured debrief to extract learning from any significant event or experience.
Conduct a structured debrief to extract learning from any significant event or experience.
Quickly determine which Cynefin domain a problem belongs to and what that means for how to approach it.
Analyze a situation through the Cynefin framework to understand what type of problem it is and choose the appropriate response.
Categorize tasks by urgency and importance to clarify what to do, schedule, delegate, or eliminate.
Categorize tasks by urgency and importance to clarify what to do, schedule, delegate, or eliminate.