Skip to content
Development
Skill

/interpreters

Bytecode interpreter and JIT compiler skill for implementing language runtimes in C/C++. Use when designing bytecode dispatch loops (switch, computed goto, threaded code), implementing stack-based or register-based VMs, adding a simple JIT using mmap/mprotect, or understanding

From plugin
low-level-dev-skills
159142 skills
Install
$ npx -y skills add mohitmishra786/low-level-dev-skills --skill interpreters --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/interpreters

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Bytecode interpreter and JIT compiler skill for implementing language runtimes in C/C++. Use when designing bytecode dispatch loops (switch, computed goto, threaded code), implementing stack-based or register-based VMs, adding a simple JIT using mmap/mprotect, or understanding

SKILL.md

interpreters.SKILL.md
name: interpreters
description: Bytecode interpreter and JIT compiler skill for implementing language runtimes in C/C++. Use when designing bytecode dispatch loops (switch, computed goto, threaded code), implementing stack-based or register-based VMs, adding a simple JIT using mmap/mprotect, or understanding performance trade-offs in interpreter design. Activates on queries about bytecode VMs, dispatch loops, computed goto, JIT compilation basics, tracing JITs, or implementing a scripting language runtime.

Interpreters and Bytecode VMs

Purpose

Guide agents through implementing efficient bytecode interpreters and simple JITs in C/C++: dispatch strategies, VM architecture choices, and performance patterns.

Triggers

  • "How do I implement a fast bytecode dispatch loop?"
  • "What is the difference between switch dispatch and computed goto?"
  • "How do I implement a register-based vs stack-based VM?"
  • "How do I add basic JIT compilation to my interpreter?"
  • "Why is my interpreter slow?"

Workflow

1. VM architecture choice

| Style | Description | Examples | |-------|-------------|---------| | Stack-based | Operands on a value stack; compact bytecode | JVM, CPython, WebAssembly | | Register-based | Operands in virtual registers; fewer instructions | Lua 5+, Dalvik | | Direct threading | Each "instruction" is a function call | Some Forth implementations | | Continuation-passing | Interpreter functions return continuations | Academic |

**Stack-based:** easier to implement, compile to; code generation is simpler. More instructions per expression. **Register-based:** fewer dispatch iterations; needs register allocation in the compiler; better cache behaviour for complex expressions.

2. Dispatch loop strategies

Switch dispatch (simplest, baseline)

while (1) {
    uint8_t op = *ip++;
    switch (op) {
        case OP_LOAD:  push(constants[*ip++]); break;
        case OP_ADD:   { Value b = pop(); Value a = pop(); push(a + b); } break;
        case OP_HALT:  return;
        // ...
    }
}

Problem: `switch` compiles to a single indirect branch from a jump table. Modern CPUs can mispredict it heavily because the same indirect branch is used for all opcodes.

Computed goto (GCC/Clang extension — fastest portable approach)

// Table of label addresses
static const void *dispatch_table[] = {
    [OP_LOAD]  = &&op_load,
    [OP_ADD]   = &&op_add,
    [OP_HALT]  = &&op_halt,
    // ...
};

#define DISPATCH() goto *dispatch_table[*ip++]

DISPATCH();  // start

op_load:
    push(constants[*ip++]);
    DISPATCH();

op_add: {
    Value b = pop(); Value a = pop(); push(a + b);
    DISPATCH();
}

op_halt:
    return;

Each opcode ends with its own indirect branch. The CPU can train the branch predictor per-opcode, dramatically improving prediction rates.

**Note:** `&&label` is a GCC/Clang extension, not standard C. Use `#ifdef __GNUC__` to guard and fall back to switch for other compilers.

Direct threaded code (most aggressive)

Each bytecode word is a function pointer or label address; the VM is the fetch-decode-execute loop itself.

typedef void (*Handler)(VM *vm);

// Bytecode is an array of handlers
Handler bytecode[] = { op_load, op_push_1, op_add, op_halt };

for (int i = 0; ; i++) {
    bytecode[i](vm);
}

3. Value representation

**Tagged pointer:** Store type tag in low bits of pointer (pointer alignment guarantees ≥ 2 bits free):

typedef uintptr_t Value;
#define TAG_INT    0x0
#define TAG_FLOAT  0x1
#define TAG_PTR    0x2
#define TAG_MASK   0x3

#define INT_VAL(v)   ((int64_t)(v) >> 2)
#define FLOAT_VAL(v) (*(float*)((v) & ~TAG_MASK))
#define IS_INT(v)    (((v) & TAG_MASK) == TAG_INT)

**NaN boxing (64-bit):** Store non-double values in NaN bit patterns:

// IEEE 754 quiet NaN: exponent all 1s, mantissa != 0
// Use high mantissa bits as type tag, low 48 bits as payload
// Allows pointer/int/bool/nil to fit in a double-sized slot

Used by V8 (formerly), LuaJIT, JavaScriptCore.

4. Stack management

#define STACK_SIZE 4096
Value stack[STACK_SIZE];
Value *sp = stack;  // stack pointer

#define PUSH(v) (*sp++ = (v))
#define POP()   (*--sp)
#define TOP()   (sp[-1])
#define PEEK(n) (sp[-(n)-1])

// Check for overflow
#define PUSH_SAFE(v) do { \
    if (sp >= stack + STACK_SIZE) { vm_error("stack overflow"); } \
    PUSH(v); \
} while(0)

5. Inline caching (IC)

Inline caching speeds up property lookups and method dispatch by caching the last observed type at each call site.

struct CallSite {
    Type   cached_type;      // Last observed receiver type
    void  *cached_method;    // Cached function pointer
    int    miss_count;       // Number of misses
};

void invoke_method(VM *vm, CallSite *cs, Value receiver, ...) {
    Type t = GET_TYPE(receiver);
    if (t == cs->cached_type) {
        // Cache hit: direct call, no lookup
        cs->cached_method(vm, receiver, ...);
    } else {
        // Cache miss: look up, update cache
        void *method = lookup_method(t, name);
        cs->cached_type = t;
        cs->cached_method = method;
        cs->miss_count++;
        method(vm, receiver, ...);
    }
}

Polymorphic IC (PIC): cache up to N (typ. 4) type-method pairs.

6. Simple JIT (mmap + machine code)

For x86-64: allocate executable memory, write machine code bytes, call it.

#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <string.h>

typedef int (*JitFn)(int a, int b);

JitFn jit_compile_add(void) {
    // x86-64: add rdi, rsi; mov rax, rdi; ret
    static const uint8_t code[] = {
        0x48, 0x01, 0xF7,   // add rdi, rsi
        0x48, 0x89, 0xF8,   // mov rax, rdi
        0xC3                 // ret
    };

    void *mem = mmap(NULL, sizeof(code),
                     PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
                     MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
    if (mem == MAP_FAILED) return NULL;

    memcpy(mem, code, sizeof(code));

    // On some systems (macOS Apple Silic
Read more
Ships withlow-level-dev-skills

A curated suite of AI agent skills for systems and low-level programming — C/C++, Rust, Zig, GPU, bare-metal firmware, Linux kernel/driver development, computer architecture, compiler internals, HPC, and more.

Get the whole plugin
Stats
172
Stars
24
Forks
Maintained
Maintenance
JavaScript
Language
MIT
License
1mo ago
Last commit
5mo ago
Created

Repo: mohitmishra786/low-level-dev-skills

Other skills on low-level-dev-skills.