Skip to content
Development
Skill

/structured-logging-lite

Design, audit, or implement application structured logging architecture from repository evidence. Use when a user asks whether or where to add logs, how to choose or migrate a logger, how to standardize events/fields/levels/redaction, how to add HTTP access or panic logs, or why

From plugin
majiayu000-spellbook
277104 skills7 agents2 commands
Install
$ npx -y skills add majiayu000/spellbook --skill structured-logging-lite --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/structured-logging-lite

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Design, audit, or implement application structured logging architecture from repository evidence. Use when a user asks whether or where to add logs, how to choose or migrate a logger, how to standardize events/fields/levels/redaction, how to add HTTP access or panic logs, or why

SKILL.md

structured-logging-lite.SKILL.md
name: structured-logging-lite
description: Design, audit, or implement application structured logging architecture from repository evidence. Use when a user asks whether or where to add logs, how to choose or migrate a logger, how to standardize events/fields/levels/redaction, how to add HTTP access or panic logs, or why production logs cannot answer an incident question. Do not use merely to tail platform logs or to design a full metrics, tracing, SLO, and incident-management program.

Structured Logging Lite

Build the smallest logging contract that makes the target system diagnosable without leaking data, duplicating audit records, or forcing an unnecessary logging-library migration.

Operating Contract

  • **Direct actions:** Inspect repositories, manifests, runtime entrypoints, tests, deployment files, and existing logs. Make local logging changes only when the user asks to implement or upgrade them; treat design, review, and diagnosis requests as read-only.
  • **Escalate before:** Ask before publishing, pushing, changing remote observability infrastructure, touching production, or expanding from application logging into a full observability rollout.
  • **Evidence-backed pushback:** Challenge a requested library migration or log-everything plan only with repository evidence, a measured requirement, a concrete security/cardinality risk, or a smaller compatible alternative.
  • **Feedback loop:** Promote repeated missing fields, false-success signals, secret leaks, or manual incident queries into the field contract, gotchas, validation tests, or a deterministic helper.
  • Never print or persist credentials, tokens, cookies, signatures, request bodies, DSNs, private URLs, or secret values while investigating.
  • Return errors through the existing error contract. A new log line never justifies swallowing, downgrading, or replacing an error.

Workflow

1. **Search before proposing.** Read applicable repository instructions, check the worktree, then locate manifests, entrypoints, logger construction, log calls, request/context propagation, error mapping, panic handling, adapters, workers, audit records, metrics, tests, and deployment configuration. 2. **Classify the target.** Distinguish a reusable library, CLI/batch job, HTTP service, long-running worker, or multi-service system. Libraries should usually accept host-provided diagnostics rather than configure process-global output. 3. **Reconstruct current coverage.** Mark lifecycle, request, authentication, application milestones, external adapters, background jobs, degraded paths, panic/crash, and third-party library output as `covered`, `partial`, or `missing`. 4. **Name the operational questions.** Require each proposed event to answer a concrete debugging, security, support, or capacity question. Delete events that only narrate normal control flow. 5. **Choose boundaries before libraries.** Configure output at the composition root; observe requests at transport middleware; log effect failures at adapters; log worker batch outcomes at the worker owner; keep pure domain code free of logger dependencies. 6. **Keep or select the logger.** Prefer a working repository-standard logger or a language standard library. Recommend migration only with evidence such as missing required capability, measured overhead, ecosystem incompatibility, or unsafe behavior. 7. **Write the contract.** Define stable event names, required and conditional fields, level policy, error classification, correlation rules, redaction rules, retention/collection ownership, and low-cardinality metric labels. 8. **Implement incrementally when authorized.** Land P0 request/error/security coverage first, P1 adapter and worker telemetry next, and tracing or backend-specific integration only when the runtime needs it. 9. **Verify with fresh evidence.** Run repository-native build/tests plus log capture, secret-canary, route-normalization, panic, and streaming-response tests that match the change.

Boundary Rules

  • Treat logs, metrics, traces, and durable audit records as different contracts. Do not claim one replaces another.
  • Emit one request-completion event per request. Add a second event only when it contains a distinct root cause or business outcome.
  • Use route templates or operation names in metrics. Keep request IDs, user IDs, asset/order IDs, raw paths, URLs, and error strings out of metric and log-index labels.
  • Include `trace_id` and `span_id` only when a real trace context exists. Do not invent IDs or require tracing as a prerequisite for useful logging.
  • Prefer fixed error codes and reason enums over arbitrary error strings for aggregation. Preserve a safe cause for debugging without exposing upstream payloads.
  • Exclude or sample high-volume health and readiness success logs. Never sample security failures or user-visible server errors without an explicit loss policy.
  • Preserve optional response/stream interfaces when observing HTTP writers; a naive wrapper can break flushing, hijacking, streaming, or byte counts.

Deliverable

For design or audit work, report:

verdict:
current_evidence:
chosen_stack:
boundary_map:
event_and_field_contract:
privacy_and_cardinality:
coverage_gaps:
P0_P1_P2:
validation:
remaining_risks:

For implementation work, also report changed files, fresh verification commands, and any deployment or collector work that remains outside the repository.

Gotchas

  • Raw URL paths turn identifiers into unbounded labels and can leak query credentials.
  • Logging every function entry/exit creates volume without diagnostic value.
  • Logging both at every return site and again at the boundary duplicates the same failure.
  • ORM defaults may print interpolated SQL, expected not-found errors, or non-JSON output.
  • A logger hidden in generic context values becomes an implicit dependency; keep typed correlation data in context and logging ownership at boundaries.
  • A successful fallback that changes user-visible output sti
Read more
Ships withmajiayu000-spellbook

Cross-runtime skills for Claude Code, Codex, and multi-agent workflows.

Get the whole plugin

Other skills on majiayu000-spellbook.

idea-analogist
Skill

idea-analogist

想法群聊室 — 类比者角色。被 idea-team 主编排器调用,或用户单独说"类比一下"、"别的行业有没有"、"yes-and 扩展"、"X 让你想到什么"、"跨界启示"时触发。**专门做跨界类比 + yes-and 扩展——不评判、不挑刺、不要求事实证据**。Do NOT use when 用户要数据(用…

idea-devils-advocate
Skill

idea-devils-advocate

想法群聊室 — 反方角色。被 idea-team 主编排器调用,或用户单独说"反方意见"、"挑这个想法的刺"、"为什么会失败"、"找漏洞 / 反例"、"devil's advocate"时触发。**专门挑漏洞、找隐藏假设、给反例——不安慰、不"也许可以这样"、不全盘否定**。Do NOT use when…

idea-research
Skill

idea-research

想法群聊室 — 调研员角色。被 idea-team 主编排器调用,或用户单独说"调研一下 X"、"X 的现状/竞品/数据"、"找 2026 数据"、"事实底"时触发。**用 WebSearch 拉真实 2026 数据、列竞品、引来源——只给事实,不评判,不建议**。Do NOT use when…

idea-team
Skill

idea-team

想法群聊室主持人 — 把一句话想法丢给多角色 AI 团队(调研员/反方/类比者)做查漏补缺。每个角色有自己的 voice,他们互相 @ 接话;你随时插话。**这是创意扩展工具,不打分、不否决、不堵路**。Use when 用户说"组个团队聊一下"、"开会讨论这个想法"、"找几个角度看看"、"群聊一下 X"、"team…

idea-to-product
Skill

idea-to-product

端到端产品教练 — 把一句话想法走到 PRD + 可点击 HTML 原型。会顶嘴、强制砍功能、用 Nielsen + Norman 做友好性硬检。Use when user 说"我有一个想法"、"想做一个产品"、"做 MVP"、"写 PRD"、"做用户友好的产品",或调用插件命令…