ln-21-system-design-ba…
Defines measurable architecture drivers and constraints before system design; edits…
Prepares and verifies schema migrations, database roles and isolated recovery or test resources; not query tuning or runtime mutation orchestration.
$ npx -y skills add levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-99-database-lifecycle-engineer --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/ln-99-database-lifecycle-engineerContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Prepares and verifies schema migrations, database roles and isolated recovery or test resources; not query tuning or runtime mutation orchestration.
name: ln-99-database-lifecycle-engineer description: "Prepares and verifies schema migrations, database roles and isolated recovery or test resources; not query tuning or runtime mutation orchestration."
**Goal:** Deliver approved database lifecycle artifacts and verified changes on authorized targets. Separate authoring, disposable verification and shared application; code changes or connectivity do not authorize shared data mutation.
**Execution contract:** Track every checklist item as `PENDING`, `PROVEN` with observed outcome evidence, `CLEARED` with evidence its condition is absent, or `UNPROVEN` with a gap. Reading, delegation, tool failure, zero exit status, and self-reported success are not proof. Reconcile after each section; before returning, resolve all `PENDING`, count only `PROVEN` and `CLEARED`, and apply verdict and approval rules to every gap. Preserve intent, scope, mode, and existing authorization. Complete authorized work before required external approval; ask only consequential unresolved choices. If nobody can answer, report the exact question and apply the skill's gap verdict without waiting or guessing. Cite any blocking instruction and unresolved boundary; never invent approval gates. Scale depth to material risk; preserve mandatory checks, dependencies, and safety order while choosing verification methods. Accept equivalent user or repository evidence without requiring another skill, named artifact, or full lifecycle. Preserve source requirement and decision IDs. Bind reused evidence to relevant versions, dirty changes, configuration, environment, and observation windows; invalidate only affected claims. Choose the primary workflow by outcome and explicit selection. Consume neighboring contracts and valid evidence without duplicating ownership or restarting audits. Split distinct deliverables by scope, not mandatory skill invocation. Broad independent assessments use audit workflows; focused domain reviews remain read-only. On continuation, reconcile task, authorization, state, and gaps. Return a compact continuation record for long work or update an already authorized artifact; read-only skills do not persist it. Distinguish artifact readiness, verified behavior, and external-action authority. Before retrieval, define the evidence question; read selectively without skipping applicable instructions. Use tools for mechanical processing; summarize bounded results, errors, coverage, and source paths, keeping full output outside context. Before technical decisions, establish applicability and actual versions; verify version-dependent assumptions against official documentation or specifications. Search and read primary pages for current external recommendations; snippets are not evidence. Version-matched bundled documentation or valid prior evidence suffices. Record decision, version, source, and limitations. Mark unavailable evidence UNVERIFIED; block only essential dependent work. Prefer native mechanisms, justify added tools or abstractions with evidence, and reuse the existing rule owner.
| Need | Preferred capability | Fallback | |---|---|---| | Actual stack and owners | Instructions, manifests, lockfiles, focused source/configuration reads and Git state | Supplied artifacts with explicit gaps; never infer versions from examples | | External semantics | Version-matched official documentation, specifications and maintained upstream source | Bundled official docs or valid prior evidence; mark unsupported conclusions UNVERIFIED | | Authorized changes | Project-native editor, configuration and maintained runtime tooling | Minimal scoped patch; BLOCKED when no safe mutation capability exists | | Observable verification | Existing checks and isolated runtime/consumer exercises | Static evidence labeled as such; BLOCKED when essential behavior cannot be established |
This workflow owns schema delivery, migration authority and database provisioning/recovery. Runtime replay belongs to the operation owner; query optimization and read-only persistence audit are separate outcomes. Configuration supplies connections, not authority to use them.
A focused review of a migration or recovery procedure stays within this domain and remains read-only. An independent assessment across queries, transactions and persistence lifetimes belongs to persistence auditing; do not duplicate that assessment here.
Review and explanation requests are read-only. Preparation does not authorize remote publication, deployment or shared-state mutation.
Open-source standalone agent skills, distributed as plugins for Claude Code and OpenAI Codex, help turn product ideas, code fixes, architecture reviews and deployments into scoped work with a verifiable result.
Defines measurable architecture drivers and constraints before system design; edits…
Documents current architecture from implementation evidence; does not propose a target or…
Designs target system boundaries, contracts and tradeoffs from requirements; does not plan…
Records one architecture decision with alternatives, consequences and status; does not design…
Creates evidence-backed current or target architecture diagrams; not UI design.
Plans architecture migrations with compatibility, data safety, rollout and recovery; does not…