analyzing-options
Analyzing different approaches for a task or problem with structured comparisons, effort…
Open a GitHub Pull Request with automatic base branch detection, scope allowlist enforcement, PR template filling, and post-create base verification. Replaces ring:generating-pr-descriptions. Use after pushing a branch when ready to open a PR. Skip if the branch is not yet
$ npx -y skills add LerianStudio/ring --skill opening-pull-requests --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/opening-pull-requestsContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Open a GitHub Pull Request with automatic base branch detection, scope allowlist enforcement, PR template filling, and post-create base verification. Replaces ring:generating-pr-descriptions. Use after pushing a branch when ready to open a PR. Skip if the branch is not yet
name: ring:opening-pull-requests description: >- Open a GitHub Pull Request with automatic base branch detection, scope allowlist enforcement, PR template filling, and post-create base verification. Replaces ring:generating-pr-descriptions. Use after pushing a branch when ready to open a PR. Skip if the branch is not yet pushed or there are uncommitted changes — commit first with ring:committing-changes. allowed-tools: - Bash - Read - Glob - Grep - AskUserQuestion
Open a GitHub Pull Request against the correct base branch, with a title that will pass scope validation and a body that fills the repo's PR template. Verifies the base after creation and corrects it automatically if GitHub defaulted to the wrong target.
Skipping detection steps is how PRs end up targeting `main` when the repo expects `develop`, or how PRs fail validation due to a missing or invalid scope. MUST complete every step in order.
---
NEVER assume the base. Run all three probes first, then apply the precedence rules below.
# Probe A — GitHub API default
gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef --jq '.defaultBranchRef.name'
# Fallback if gh unavailable: git remote show origin | grep 'HEAD branch' | awk '{print $NF}'
# Probe B — PR template hint
# Read .github/pull_request_template.md — note any explicit branch name mentioned
# Probe C — develop branch existence
git ls-remote --heads origin develop| Priority | Source | Rule | |----------|--------|------| | **1 — highest** | PR template | If `.github/pull_request_template.md` explicitly names a target branch, use it. Overrides everything. | | **2** | develop exists + user confirms | If Probe C finds `develop` AND it differs from Probe A, show both options and ask the user to confirm. Use the user's choice. | | **3 — fallback** | GitHub API default | Use the value from Probe A. | | **4** | Neither detected | STOP — ask the user which branch to target. |
State the resolved `$BASE` and which source determined it before proceeding.
---
MUST detect the allowlist before proposing the PR title. A title with a wrong or missing scope will fail PR validation and block the merge.
Check in this order:
1. `.github/workflows/pr-validation.yml` (primary) 2. `.github/workflows/pr-title.yml` 3. `.github/workflows/commitlint.yml` 4. `.github/workflows/semantic-pull-request.yml` 5. Root configs: `commitlint.config.{js,cjs,mjs,ts}`, `.commitlintrc*`
| Form | Example | |------|---------| | `scopes:` block (one per line) | Under `amannn/action-semantic-pull-request` | | `scopes: a,b,c` inline | Comma-separated on one line | | `scope-enum` rule | In commitlint config arrays |
Also extract any **type** restrictions — some repos limit allowed types beyond the default Conventional Commits set.
| Situation | Required Action | |-----------|-----------------| | Policy found, scope is clear | Use only scopes from the allowlist | | Policy found, scope is ambiguous | STOP and ask the user which allowed scope to use | | No policy file found | Infer a candidate scope from recent merged PRs first: `gh pr list --state merged --limit 15 --json title --jq '.[].title'`. Present the inferred scope to the user for confirmation; if no clear pattern emerges, ask the user for a scope. |
**NEVER** omit the scope. **NEVER** invent a scope not in the allowlist.
State the policy source and chosen scope before proceeding.
---
git status --porcelain # check for uncommitted changes git branch --show-current # confirm current branch name (empty in detached HEAD) git fetch origin <current-branch> --quiet # refresh remote ref before checking push state git ls-remote --heads origin <current-branch> # confirm branch exists on remote git rev-list origin/<current-branch>..HEAD --count # confirm no local commits ahead
| Condition | Detection | Required Action | |-----------|-----------|-----------------| | Uncommitted changes exist | `git status --porcelain` returns output | STOP — ask user to commit first with `ring:committing-changes` | | Detached HEAD / no branch | `git branch --show-current` returns empty output | STOP — ask user to checkout or create a named branch first | | Branch not on remote | `git ls-remote` returns no SHA for the branch | STOP — push first: `git push -u origin <branch>` | | Local commits ahead of remote | `git rev-list origin/<branch>..HEAD --count` returns non-zero | STOP — push pending commits first: `git push` |
**Fail closed.** Check in this order: uncommitted changes → detached HEAD → branch on remote → no local commits ahead. Only continue when all four checks pass. Do NOT interpolate an empty branch name into `git ls-remote` or `git rev-list`.
---
cat .github/pull_request_template.md 2>/dev/null
If the template exists, use it as the body structure and fill in every section. If no template exists, use this default structure:
## Summary <!-- What does this PR do and why? --> ## Type of Change - [ ] Bug fix - [ ] New feature - [ ] Breaking change - [ ] Documentation update ## Breaking Changes None. ## Testing - [ ] Unit tests pass - [ ] Manually tested ## Related Issues <!-- Closes #issue -->
---
git log origin/$BASE..HEAD --oneline git diff origin/$BASE...HEAD --stat
Use this output to fill the PR body accurately.
---
<type>(<scope>): <description>
Requirements:
Proven engineering practices, enforced through skills. Ring is a comprehensive skills library and workflow system for AI agents that transforms how AI assistants approach software development.
Repo: LerianStudio/ring
Analyzing different approaches for a task or problem with structured comparisons, effort…
Auditing a service's production readiness against Ring engineering standards across base…
Cleaning redundant and obvious comments following clean code principles while preserving…
Commit changes with scope allowlist enforcement, atomic grouping, GPG-signed conventional…
Creating a handoff document that captures session state (completed work, decisions, open…
Creating an isolated git worktree for parallel branch work: selects the directory by priority…