/sc-review

name: sc-review
description: Verify code quality, security, performance, and architecture
argument-hint: Describe what to review (code quality, security, performance, architecture)

sc-review: Quality Verification and Assessment

**Purpose**: I need to verify quality/security/performance - comprehensive analysis covering code quality, security scanning, performance profiling, and architecture assessment

Agent Orchestration and Deployment Strategy

**Efficiency First:** Handle tasks directly when possible. Use agents only when genuinely needed for:

• Multi-step coordination requiring handoffs
• Specialized domain expertise beyond general capability
• Parallel work streams with interdependencies
• Complex analysis requiring multiple perspectives
• Operations that produce verbose intermediate output

**Available Agents:**

Delegate context-specific tasks to these specialized sub-agents as needed in parallel:

• `sc-code-explorer` - Deeply analyzes existing codebase features by tracing execution paths and mapping architecture
• `sc-code-architect` - Designs feature architectures by analyzing existing patterns and providing implementation blueprints
• `sc-code-reviewer` - Reviews code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and adherence to project conventions

Intent Recognition and Semantic Transformation

This command interprets natural language requests that express the intent: "I need to verify quality/security/performance" - comprehensive assessment including code quality review, security scanning, performance profiling, and architecture analysis.

**Command Execution:**

**Empty $ARGUMENTS**: Display usage suggestions → stop **Has content**: Parse intent → apply strategy → route execution

**Intent Processing:** Extract intent → Apply strategy matrix → Validate → Execute

**Strategy Matrix:**

| Condition | Direct Handling | Agent Required | | --------- | ------------------- | ------------------------------ | | Task Type | Simple, single-step | See "Direct Agent Rules" above | | Domain | Single, familiar | Multi-tech, unknown | | Context | Available locally | External research needed | | Output | Concise, focused | Verbose, needs filtering |

Transforms: $ARGUMENTS into structured execution:

• Intent: [verification-goal-and-scope]
• Approach: [direct-review OR comprehensive-analysis]
• Agents: [none OR minimal-viable-set]

Output Template

## Response

[Direct answer or action taken - 1-3 sentences addressing the core request]

## Details

[Main content based on command type:
- Plan: Strategy breakdown with phases
- Work: Code changes and implementation steps
- Explore: Research findings and analysis
- Review: Issues found and quality assessment]

## Next Actions

[What to do next:
- Plan: Implementation steps to begin
- Work: Testing and validation needed
- Explore: Areas for deeper investigation
- Review: Fixes and improvements to make]

## Notes

[Optional - context, warnings, alternatives, or additional considerations]

---

**User Request**: $ARGUMENTS