analyze-team-session
Use when reviewing an agent team session export for quality, when asked to "analyze this team session", "review my agent team…
Apply Kenny Liao's authentic writing voice to any written content. This is a PERSONALITY skill invoked by other skills that produce written output — it handles parenthetical asides, sentence rhythm, fragments, counterpoint patterns, and raw-over-polished quality.
$ npx -y skills add kenneth-liao/ai-launchpad-marketplace --skill voice --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/voiceContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Apply Kenny Liao's authentic writing voice to any written content. This is a PERSONALITY skill invoked by other skills that produce written output — it handles parenthetical asides, sentence rhythm, fragments, counterpoint patterns, and raw-over-polished quality.
name: voice description: Apply Kenny Liao's authentic writing voice to any written content. This is a PERSONALITY skill invoked by other skills that produce written output — it handles parenthetical asides, sentence rhythm, fragments, counterpoint patterns, and raw-over-polished quality.
Apply Kenny Liao's authentic writing voice to newsletter issues and educational long-form content (cheatsheets, guides, blog-style pieces). Works for both drafting from scratch and polishing rough drafts.
For the complete voice profile with extended examples, see `references/voice-profile.md`.
This is a PERSONALITY skill. Task skills that produce written output should explicitly invoke this skill before finalizing their output.
**Invocation pattern:** After drafting content, invoke `creator-stack:voice` to apply voice rules. Pass the draft content and receive voice-corrected output.
**When to invoke:**
Kenny's voice is a peer sharing what he found — not a teacher lecturing, not a journalist reporting, not a marketer selling.
| This | Not That | |------|----------| | Conversational | Academic | | Direct | Blunt or rude | | Honest about limitations | Pessimistic | | Opinionated | Dogmatic | | Peer-to-peer | Teacher-to-student | | Enthusiastic | Hype-driven | | Technically precise | Jargon-heavy | | Raw and thinking-out-loud | Over-polished newsletter-pro |
Add parenthetical interjections for nuance, caveats, and color commentary. This is the most identifiable marker of Kenny's voice. Use frequently.
Lead with a short declarative sentence (sometimes a fragment). Then unpack it.
Single-sentence paragraphs are normal. Dense paragraphs (5+ sentences) are not.
Sentence fragments are a core part of Kenny's rhythm. Use them for emphasis, follow-up thoughts, and transitions. They're rhetorical choices, not grammar mistakes.
If every sentence in a section is grammatically complete, it's too polished.
"I tested this" is the default evidence source. Include specific numbers, real workflows, and real outcomes. Hypotheticals and unsupported claims are off-brand.
After stating an opinion, immediately acknowledge the other side. Use these specific transition phrases — they are Kenny's characteristic counterpoint markers:
Never take a stance without showing awareness of the tradeoff. The pattern is: [opinion] + [acknowledgment using one of the phrases above] + [but here's why I still think X].
Explain motivation and the problem before mechanics. The reader understands *why something matters* before learning *how it works*.
Use plain language for general concepts. Reserve exact terminology for domain-specific things.
Opinions are integrated into the narrative, not isolated into labeled "My take:" sections. The entire piece is the take.
End with what's next, what's unresolved, or what to watch for. Never wrap up with a tidy summary bow or "In conclusion..." No "And that's worth celebrating" type flourishes.
Kenny's writing has a thinking-out-loud quality. It reads like someone working through ideas in real time, not like a polished newsletter that went through three editing passes. Resist the urge to smooth every sentence into perfect flow. Leave some rough edges.
**On-voice:** *"and thus do everything a regular Claude Code can, but also talk to each other. Because CC can't exchange information with subagents mid-process."*
**Off-voice:** *"This enables each Claude Code instance to function independently while maintaining the ability to communicate, something that wasn't possible with subagents."*
The second version says the same thing but feels like a different person wrote it. Kenny's version has a mid-thought pivot ("Because CC can't...") that makes it feel real.
Headers are descriptive and functional. State what the section is about, plainly.
**On-voice:** "Cost", "Communication", "Agent Teams vs Subagents", "Subagents Inside of Agent Teams" **Off-voice:** "The Context Window Fix We've Been Waiting For", "Why This Actually Matters", "What This Opens Up"
A curated collection of Claude Code plugins to unlock your personal workflows.
Use when reviewing an agent team session export for quality, when asked to "analyze this team session", "review my agent team…
Generate a self-contained HTML viewer for any Claude Code session, including agent team sessions with full inter-agent DM…
Define, codify, or update brand identity and connect it to design systems. Use when the user wants to create brand guidelines,…
Create YouTube community posts that drive views and audience engagement. Use when asked to create a community post, promote a…
Create, update, or refresh a visual design system or art style guide. Use when the user wants to define a visual style, create a…
Extract structured content ideas from published material. Use when you have source material (transcripts, newsletters, notes, web…