a2a-security-review
Review agent-to-agent (A2A) / multi-agent-system trust: peer identity and authentication, message integrity, capability-negotiation trust, and delegation-chain…
Look up MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations, and map an observed behavior, finding, or detection to the right technique ID(s). Use whenever work needs a consistent ATT&CK reference — detection coverage, threat reports, red-team TTP planning, or tagging a finding.
$ npx -y skills add jassics/awesome-claude-security --skill attack-lookup --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/attack-lookupContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Look up MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations, and map an observed behavior, finding, or detection to the right technique ID(s). Use whenever work needs a consistent ATT&CK reference — detection coverage, threat reports, red-team TTP planning, or tagging a finding.
name: attack-lookup description: >- Look up MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations, and map an observed behavior, finding, or detection to the right technique ID(s). Use whenever work needs a consistent ATT&CK reference — detection coverage, threat reports, red-team TTP planning, or tagging a finding.
Correct, consistent ATT&CK references — the right tactic + technique ID(s) for a behavior — so detections, reports, and emulation across the team all speak the same language.
1. **Classify the behavior** by adversary goal → that's the **tactic** (the "why": Initial Access, Execution, Persistence, … Impact). 2. **Find the technique** under that tactic that matches the "how"; pick the sub-technique when one fits (e.g., T1059.001 PowerShell under T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter). See `reference.md` for the tactic list and common techniques. 3. **Map to mitigations/data sources** when relevant — what detects or prevents it (feeds `detection-engineering`). 4. **Cite precisely** — technique ID + name, and note the ATT&CK version/domain (Enterprise/Mobile/ICS). For anything beyond the common set, verify the current ID against attack.mitre.org rather than guessing — IDs and sub-technique structure change between versions.
The matched tactic(s) + technique ID(s) with names, optional mitigation/data-source pointers, and a one-line rationale for the mapping. For coverage gap analysis use `detection-engineering:detection-coverage-review`; for actor TTP sets use `threat-intelligence`.
ATT&CK is a living matrix — don't trust a memorized ID for an obscure technique; confirm against the current version. Map to the most specific sub-technique that's actually supported by evidence; over-precise tagging is as misleading as vague tagging. See `reference.md` for the tactic taxonomy and frequently used techniques.
A Claude Code plugin marketplace for the full cybersecurity & GenAI-security lifecycle — from recon and threat modeling to detection engineering, GRC, and CISO-level strategy. A pentester knows which OWASP test bends a broken-access-control endpoint.
Repo: jassics/awesome-claude-security
Review agent-to-agent (A2A) / multi-agent-system trust: peer identity and authentication, message integrity, capability-negotiation trust, and delegation-chain…
Test the agent execution harness/runtime itself — LangChain/LangGraph, AutoGen, CrewAI, custom ReAct-style loops, or computer-use/browser-use agents — for…
Assess an autonomous / tool-using AI agent for security end-to-end: tool privileges, autonomy and approval boundaries, excessive agency, memory/state…
Test what an AI agent will actually do without human confirmation, including under injected-goal / prompt-injection scenarios, to validate its autonomy and…
Review the security of MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers/clients an agent uses: server trust tier, tool/resource description and result poisoning,…
Inventory the tools/functions an AI agent can call and audit their privileges, side effects, and approval requirements to find excessive-agency and…