safety-review
Run an AI safety review for a feature/model — harms, evaluations, guardrails, and a documented safety case.
Run a T2/T3 security investigation — correlate telemetry, enrich, reconstruct the timeline, reach an evidence-backed verdict.
> /plugin marketplace add jassics/awesome-claude-securityHow it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/investigateContext preview
What this command does when you run it.
Run a T2/T3 security investigation — correlate telemetry, enrich, reconstruct the timeline, reach an evidence-backed verdict.
description: Run a T2/T3 security investigation — correlate telemetry, enrich, reconstruct the timeline, reach an evidence-backed verdict. argument-hint: [case / escalated alert + context]
Investigate: **$ARGUMENTS**
Walk the investigation, using installed skills (note any whose plugin is missing):
1. **Frame** — `/security-analyst:security-investigation` to set hypotheses and the questions to answer. 2. **Correlate** — pull and connect telemetry across sources; `/detection-engineering:threat-hunting` to find related activity. 3. **Enrich** — `/threat-intelligence:ioc-enrichment` and `/threat-intelligence:threat-actor-profiling` to attribute and contextualize. 4. **Timeline** — `/dfir:forensic-triage` to reconstruct what happened, in order, with evidence. 5. **Verdict** — confirmed incident or not; scope, impact, and confidence. If confirmed, hand to `/dfir:incident-response`. 6. **Report** — `/security-reporting:finding` or an investigation writeup; `/security-diagramming:mindmap` for the timeline/relationship view.
For deep execution, hand off to the `security-analyst` agent. Anchor every conclusion to specific evidence and state your confidence.
A Claude Code plugin marketplace for the full cybersecurity & GenAI-security lifecycle — from recon and threat modeling to detection engineering, GRC, and CISO-level strategy. A pentester knows which OWASP test bends a broken-access-control endpoint.
Repo: jassics/awesome-claude-security
Run an AI safety review for a feature/model — harms, evaluations, guardrails, and a documented safety case.
Run a threat-informed defense cycle for a technique or threat — coverage check, hunt, detection, and purple-team validation.
Build a board/executive security brief — strategy, quantified risk, and a board-ready deck.
Assess technology/security risk for a strategic decision and frame the secure-by-design path.
Run the pre-commit security gate on the current changeset and report a single pass/fail verdict.
Run a compliance gap-assessment for a framework, tie gaps to risk, and produce findings + remediation.