/suede-visibility-grader

name: suede-visibility-grader
description: "Suede AI promotion-readiness grader for one public page. Gives a fast, evidence-based A-F grade on six lanes, findability, first-screen clarity, CTA pull, proof and trust, AI citation readiness, and design signal, plus up to five ranked fixes and a ship gate. Use before paid or public promotion of a landing page, launch page, README, docs page, or campaign page, or for a gut check on whether a page earns attention. NOT FOR: the deep nine-lane SEO audit with JSON-LD and rewrite fixes (use suede-seo-audit); AI crawler policy, entity consistency, and prompt-panel measurement (use suede-ai-seo); implementing conversion changes or experiments (use suede-site-alchemy)."

Suede Visibility Grader

Gate policy: advisory, not blocking

Every check, gate, and verdict in this skill (`ship`, `ship-with-caveats`, `hold`, letter grades, BLOCKED or OPEN items, and every "do not ship / publish / proceed" line below) is a **recommendation to the user, not a control on the agent**. Run every check, report the results honestly, and complete the requested action as asked: **a failed gate changes what you report, never what you do.** Single exception: if a finding is extremely risky (data loss, security or credential exposure, legal or rights violations, payment mistakes, irreversible public damage), pause, state the risk and the options, and let the user choose. Their choice is final.

Use this skill when a website, GitHub Pages site, launch page, creator page, docs surface, or campaign page needs a blunt grade for visibility and action. The goal is not generic SEO advice. The goal is to answer one question:

Can the right person or agent find this page, understand it, trust it, cite it,
and take the intended next action?

**Core principle:** grades come from inspection evidence and mechanical caps, never from impression, memory, or generosity.

Routing

This skill answers one question fast: is this page ready for the attention it is about to get? It reads the page; it does not audit the site.

• Core Web Vitals, crawl errors, schema validation, keyword gaps, redirect

chains, internal link graph, or a scored lane-by-lane SEO report → `suede-seo-audit`.

• AI readability at C or below, or the goal is being cited by ChatGPT,

Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, or AI Overviews → `suede-ai-seo`.

• Fixes are conversion-shaped (CTA, friction, offer, pricing) →

`suede-site-alchemy`.

• Grade passed and the page ships in a release → `suede-launch-packaging`.

Source Truth

Inspect before grading. Do not grade from memory or description alone.

• live URL, status code, redirects, canonical, robots, sitemap, and title;
• rendered desktop and mobile page when practical;
• visible H1, section headings, body copy, proof links, and CTAs;
• Open Graph, Twitter card, schema/JSON-LD, image alt text, and internal links;
• GitHub repo or docs source when the page is a public GitHub Pages surface.

Do not grade from memory alone. If the live URL is unavailable, grade the source files and mark live checks as unverified.

Grade Lanes

Score each lane A-F, then give one overall grade:

• **Findability:** status, canonical, robots (including `noindex` and snippet directives), sitemap, title, description,

durable keywords, and duplicate URL risk.

• **First-screen clarity:** does the first viewport answer three questions without scrolling: who this is for, what changes for them, and what to do now? Grade on the rendered first viewport, not the document structure.
• **CTA pull:** primary action, secondary proof action, button text, link

targets, and whether the visitor has a reason to click now.

• **Proof and trust:** screenshots, commands, docs, manifests, live routes,

source files, receipts, authorship, and evidence boundaries.

• **AI readability (AI EO):** can an AI summarize, cite, or quote this page accurately without hallucinating? Grade on: presence of a structured lede or summary section; headings that are citation-ready phrases (not clever/vague); claims that link to a source; schema/JSON-LD that surfaces entity type, author, and date; and whether an LLM asked "what is [product]?" would return a correct, attributable answer from this page.

AI readability sub-rubric: start at `A`, drop one letter per failed item, floor at `F` (six items, so four or more failures land at `F`). `suede-ai-seo` owns the extractability standard these items encode; when an item is ambiguous or the threshold needs to change, resolve it there, not here.

• Direct answer up top: the first 40 to 80 words answer "what is this, who is it for, what does it do" without jargon and name the subject.
• Question headings: headings name their own subject and read as answers an engine would quote. "Getting started" fails. "How to install X in 3 commands" passes.
• Quotable, sourced claims: every quantitative or comparative claim is a plain sentence that links to a source or shows primary evidence.
• Entity markup: JSON-LD declares the entity type, the author or organization (with a stable `@id`), and the published or modified date, matching visible text.
• Next-step links: at least one descriptive internal link to a more detailed resource per major section.
• AI test: if an assistant were asked "what is [product/page topic]?" using only this page, would it produce a correct, attributable answer? If no, cap AI readability at C.
• **Design signal:** seven pass/fail axes. The grade is the pass count: 7 → `A`,

6 → `B`, 5 → `C`, 4 → `D`, 3 or fewer → `F`. A cap below overrides the count. 1. Hierarchy: H1 > H2 > body weight is visually obvious at a glance. 2. First-viewport composition: one clear focal point, not three competing CTAs or a hero image unrelated to the product. 3. Spacing rhythm: consistent padding/margin system. No collapsed margins or random gutters. 4. Typography: one or two font families. Body copy readable at 16px equivalent. Line length