amazon-returns-recover…
Suede-affiliated Amazon money-recovery audit for restocking fees, short or denied refunds, and Amazon-billed subscriptions. Use…
Suede-owned prospecting and qualification discipline. Use when defining an ICP, sourcing and enriching a bounded lead list, finding early adopters or design partners, scoring account fit, or documenting disqualification evidence. NOT FOR: sending outreach (use suede-cold-email),
$ npx -y skills add JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills --skill suede-prospecting --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/suede-prospectingContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Suede-owned prospecting and qualification discipline. Use when defining an ICP, sourcing and enriching a bounded lead list, finding early adopters or design partners, scoring account fit, or documenting disqualification evidence. NOT FOR: sending outreach (use suede-cold-email),
name: suede-prospecting description: "Suede AI prospecting and qualification: defines the ICP, then builds a bounded, source-backed lead sheet across four branches (B2B SaaS, general B2B, local business, and early demand signals from forums, reviews, and public issues), using licensed data (Apollo, ZoomInfo, Clay, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Sales Navigator for manual research) with fit scores, disqualification evidence, source and date per contact, and CAN-SPAM, GDPR, PECR, and CASL checks before handoff. Use when defining an ICP, sourcing and enriching a lead list, finding early adopters or design partners, scoring account fit, or documenting disqualification evidence. NOT FOR: sending outreach (use suede-cold-email), changing CRM routing or scoring (use suede-revops), or profiling competitors instead of prospects (use suede-competitor-profiling)." metadata: version: 1.2.0
Suede AI Prospecting turns an approved ICP into a source-backed, scored lead sheet across B2B SaaS, general B2B, local business, and early demand-signal motions. Every candidate carries qualification evidence, disqualification logic, and a compliance-aware handoff before outreach begins.
IRON LAW: every row carries a source URL and the date it was captured, or it does not ship. No exceptions, no "verify later," no placeholder rows.
That single rule is what makes the downstream GDPR / CAN-SPAM lineage real. A row without it is not a low-confidence lead: it is not a lead.
**Check for product marketing context first:** If `.agents/product-marketing.md` exists (or `.claude/product-marketing.md`, or the legacy `product-marketing-context.md` filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Prospecting motions differ enough that the workflow forks at intake. Pick **one** branch based on who the user is selling to:
| Branch | Sell to | What "qualified" looks like | Possible sources after access and terms checks | |--------|---------|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------| | **SaaS** | Other SaaS companies / digital businesses | ICP fit + tech stack match + growth signals (funding, hiring, product velocity) | Public company sites, directories, developer sources, or licensed data available to the user | | **B2B** | Non-SaaS B2B (services, manufacturers, enterprises, mid-market) | Industry + size + geographic fit + buying signals (trigger events, vendor changes) | Public company records, industry directories, or licensed business data available to the user | | **Local SMB** | Local small businesses (shops, gyms, restaurants, clinics, salons, services) | Active business + website status + proximity + decision-maker access | Public business sites and manually reviewed listings allowed by their terms | | **Demand-signal** | Early-stage: first customers, design partners, or beta users | A cited public pain, demand, or timing signal, not just firmographic fit | Public forums, reviews, issues, posts, jobs, and launch records reachable with current authorized tools or manual review |
Before using any named platform or vendor, discover what is currently callable, authenticated, authorized, and permitted by its terms. If no research connector or browser is available, give the user a manual source checklist and work from URLs, exports, screenshots, or source text they provide.
If the user describes a hybrid motion (e.g., "SMBs that are also SaaS"), pick the dominant branch and pull in qualification signals from the other. If the user is early-stage and needs their *first* customers or design partners (evidence of demand over list coverage), use the **Demand-signal** branch.
For the branch-specific deep dives:
---
Every prospecting engagement follows the same five phases. Tools and qualification signals change per branch; the phases don't.
Pull from `product-marketing.md` if available. Otherwise, gather:
1. **Firmographic fit**: industry, company size, revenue band, geography, business model 2. **Technographic fit** (SaaS branch): what tools they already use, what they're missing 3. **Buying signal**: why now? (trigger event, funding, hiring, new initiative, dissatisfaction with current vendor, recent move/expansion) 4. **Decision-maker profile**: role, seniority, what they care about 5. **Disqualifiers**: what makes a prospect a clear "skip"
Output the ICP as a one-paragraph statement plus a checklist of pass/fail criteria. Don't move to discovery without this.
Start at 2-3x the requested output count, adjusted down for thin source access or review capacity. Expand only when the observed disqualification rate shows another batch is needed, and cap expansion at 3 rounds. At the cap, stop sourcing: report the disqualification rate you observed and hand back a narrower ICP proposal rather than grinding through more sources.
public, or licensed sources. Named vendors are candidates only after access, freshness, terms, and cost checks.
review, then cross-check listing claims against the business's own site or another current source.
A smaller evidence-complete list is preferable to padding the output with unverified candidates. Don't start qualification until every candidate ha
Open-source AI skills for SEO, AI search visibility, conversion copy, marketing strategy, and business operations. Reusable workflows for Claude Code and Codex, plus code review, app delivery, and creator tools.
Suede-affiliated Amazon money-recovery audit for restocking fees, short or denied refunds, and Amazon-billed subscriptions. Use…
Suede Labs Android app factory: plan, build, test, and release a production-grade native Android app from a product idea through…
Suede AI full-stack surface builder that runs design, copy, and visual QA as one pass: landing pages, brand surfaces, product UI,…
Suede Labs full writing stack: sharper copy for docs, pages, email, social, headlines, CTAs, product listings, and public…
Suede Labs workflow for turning a website, PWA, dashboard, or marketplace into an iOS app. Use when the user has a live site or…
Suede-owned recovery discipline for recurring charges billed outside Amazon: App Store, Google Play, PayPal, direct-bill…