Skip to content
Agent Orchestration
Skill

/tendril-debug-plan

Debug a Tendril plan by analyzing its execution logs, session JSONL, verification results, and checking infrastructure. Produces actionable bugfix and improvement recommendations. Use when the user wants to investigate why a plan failed, behaved unexpectedly, or to audit plan

BOOST
From plugin
tendril-skills
1986 skills
Install
$ npx -y skills add Ivy-Interactive/Ivy-Tendril --skill tendril-debug-plan --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/tendril-debug-plan

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Debug a Tendril plan by analyzing its execution logs, session JSONL, verification results, and checking infrastructure. Produces actionable bugfix and improvement recommendations. Use when the user wants to investigate why a plan failed, behaved unexpectedly, or to audit plan

SKILL.md

tendril-debug-plan.SKILL.md
name: tendril-debug-plan
description: Debug a Tendril plan by analyzing its execution logs, session JSONL, verification results, and checking infrastructure. Produces actionable bugfix and improvement recommendations. Use when the user wants to investigate why a plan failed, behaved unexpectedly, or to audit plan execution quality.

tendril-debug-plan

Debug and analyze Tendril plan executions end-to-end - from plan creation through checking/verification - and produce a set of concrete bugfix and improvement recommendations.

Invocation

/tendril-debug-plan <planid> <note>
  • **planid** - 5-digit Tendril plan ID (e.g., `03451`)
  • **note** - free-text context about what to look for (e.g., "verification passed but shouldn't have", "took forever", "got stuck in Building state")

What This Skill Does

1. Gathers all artifacts for a plan: `plan.yaml`, revisions, logs, costs, verification reports, session JSONL 2. Analyzes the execution timeline, token usage, tool call patterns, and error loops 3. Cross-references findings with Tendril source code and promptware instructions 4. Produces a structured recommendations report with concrete fixes

Execution Steps

Phase 1 - Gather Plan Artifacts

Resolve paths from environment:

  • `TENDRIL_HOME` - base config/data directory
  • `TENDRIL_PLANS` - plans directory (defaults to `$TENDRIL_HOME/Plans`)
  • `REPOS_HOME` - for locating Tendril source code

Read these files from the plan folder (`$TENDRIL_PLANS/{planid}-*/`):

| File | Purpose | | ------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | `plan.yaml` | Plan metadata: state, repos, commits, PRs, verifications, dependsOn | | `revisions/*.md` | Plan scope, acceptance criteria, verification checkboxes. Last one is the one that is the executable one. | | `costs.csv` | Token/cost breakdown per promptware (if available) | | `verification/*.md` | Verification reports (PreExecution, IvyFrameworkVerification, etc.) | | `worktrees/` | Check if worktrees were created/cleaned up |

The plan folder holds **no logs**. Every job that ran against the plan wrote its artifacts flat into `$TENDRIL_HOME/Jobs/`, named `{jobId}-{planId}-{promptware}`. Find them all for a plan with:

ls "$TENDRIL_HOME/Jobs/"*"-{planid}-"*

| File | Purpose | |------|---------| | `{stem}.md` | Job Log - status, timings, cost, CLI command, final output, agent `## Agent Log` narrative | | `{stem}.prompt.md` | Job Prompt - the exact prompt handed to the agent | | `{stem}.raw.jsonl` | Job Raw Log - full unparsed CLI session data | | `{stem}.eventwire.jsonl` | Job Eventwire Log - Tendril's parsed event stream |

Note that the `CreatePlan` job that created the plan is named `{jobId}-CreatePlan` with **no** plan id, so it will not appear in the glob above. Use `/tendril-debug-job` to drill into any single job.

Phase 2 - Locate and Analyze Session JSONL

Each Job Log contains a `SessionId`. The raw Claude session data lives at:

~/.claude/projects/*/{SessionId}.jsonl

Use `find ~/.claude/projects -name "{SessionId}.jsonl"` to locate each file.

For each JSONL session, extract:

**Token Usage:**

  • Sum `input_tokens`, `output_tokens`, `cache_read_input_tokens`, `cache_creation_input_tokens` from `type: "assistant"` messages
  • Cache hit ratio: `cache_read / (cache_read + cache_creation + input)`
  • Flag messages with unusually high `input_tokens` (context bloat)

**Tool Call Patterns:**

  • Count each tool type (Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob)
  • Identify repeated reads of the same file (redundant)
  • Identify failed tool calls and their errors
  • Detect thrashing: read-edit-read-edit cycles on the same file

**Error Patterns:**

  • Grep for `error`, `failed`, `exception`, `timeout` in tool results
  • Count compilation fix-retry cycles (build → error → edit → build loops)
  • Permission errors, missing files, environmental issues

**Time Analysis:**

  • Wall-clock duration from first to last timestamp
  • Long gaps between messages (slow tools, rate limiting)
  • Timeout detection

Use the `Analyze-SessionJsonl.ps1` tool if available at:

$REPOS_HOME/Ivy-Tendril/src/Ivy.Tendril.TeamIvyConfig/Promptwares/PlanEvaluator/Tools/Analyze-SessionJsonl.ps1

Phase 3 - Analyze the Checking/Verification Pipeline

This is the core debugging focus. Examine:

**Pre-execution checks (ExecutePlan Step 1.5–1.8):**

  • Did dependency checking work correctly? (`dependsOn` plans completed, PRs merged)
  • Did worktree validation catch problems? Or miss them?
  • Did code state validation (`**Current implementation**` blocks) match reality?
  • Did auto-commit handle dirty files properly?

**Verification execution (ExecutePlan Step 7):**

  • Which verifications ran vs were skipped?
  • Did verifications match what the plan revision checkboxes specified?
  • For each verification: did the prompt execute correctly? Were failures diagnosed?
  • How many fix-retry cycles occurred (max 3 allowed)?
  • Were verification results written to `verification/` correctly?
  • Were plan verification statuses updated via `tendril plan set-verification`?

**Post-verification (ExecutePlan Step 7.5–8):**

  • Were recommendations generated?
  • Was the worktree left clean?
  • Were zombie processes detected/killed?

**CheckResult / completion verification (JobService):**

  • For CreatePlan: did `VerifyCreatePlanResult` find the plan folder or the `identified as duplicate:` marker?
  • Did `CheckDependencies` correctly evaluate dependency plan states?
  • Did `TryBlockForDependencies` transition appropriately?

Cross-reference each finding with:

  • `P
Read more
Ships withtendril-skills

AI agents can now write 99% of the code. This changes what it means to be a developer. Our role shifts to knowing "what good looks like". To do that, we need completely new developer tools. Tendril is what replaces your IDE in an agentic era.

Get the whole plugin
Stats
198
Stars
9
Forks
Active
Maintenance
C#
Language
12d ago
Last commit
5mo ago
Created

Repo: Ivy-Interactive/Ivy-Tendril

Other skills on tendril-skills.