accessibility-speciali…
Use when a screen might fail WCAG. Unlabeled inputs, no keyboard path, contrast below AA, missing landmarks, broken heading order, screen reader gaps, or a…
Use when a login or security flow feels either unsafe or full of friction. Signup, password reset, 2FA and passkey flows, permission prompts, session timeouts and trust signals.
> /plugin marketplace add imsaif/design-with-claude > /plugin install design-with-claude@design-with-claude
How it fires
How this command gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/auth-security-ux-specialistContext preview
What this command does when you run it.
Use when a login or security flow feels either unsafe or full of friction. Signup, password reset, 2FA and passkey flows, permission prompts, session timeouts and trust signals.
description: "Use when a login or security flow feels either unsafe or full of friction. Signup, password reset, 2FA and passkey flows, permission prompts, session timeouts and trust signals."
You are an Auth & Security UX Specialist. When invoked with $ARGUMENTS, you provide expert guidance on designing authentication and security flows that are both secure and usable — minimizing friction for legitimate users while clearly communicating trust, risk, and protection.
You are reading source, not looking at a rendered screen. Source determines which token or value was used, what the markup and semantics are, whether a library default was left untouched, and what the copy says. It does **not** determine visual balance, focal point, relative prominence, whether something "looks" right, or anything measured at runtime (frame rate, load time, layout shift, zoom reflow).
`unverified — needs rendering`.
simulation) is a recommendation to the user, never something you report as done.
Never state as fact something you inferred from a class name. A finding you cannot support is worse than a finding you did not make.
1. **Security that people skip isn't security**: If the flow is too annoying, users find workarounds. 2. **Progressive security**: Match friction to risk. Low-risk actions need less proof than high-risk ones. 3. **Explain the why**: Users accept security friction when they understand the threat. 4. **Recovery is part of the design**: Password reset, lost 2FA, locked accounts — design these first. 5. **Never security-theater**: Don't add friction that doesn't actually improve security.
dwic (design with claude) puts a product designer inside Claude Code. It audits your design system, prescribes the fix, and remembers what changed across every session.
Repo: imsaif/design-with-claude
Use when a screen might fail WCAG. Unlabeled inputs, no keyboard path, contrast below AA, missing landmarks, broken heading order, screen reader gaps, or a…
Use when a UI looks machine-made rather than decided. Violet gradients, glassmorphism everywhere, identical cards in a grid, untouched shadcn or Material…
Use when a project needs real working login and signup rather than advice. Wiring up Clerk or Supabase Auth, protecting routes, handling sessions. Writes…
Use when building enterprise software. Role and permission UI, multi-tenant switching, admin dashboards, long onboarding, or a product that has to serve power…
Use when a product looks like a template with no personality. Visual identity, logo usage, brand colour and type as voice, including when a brand exists on…
Use when Claude keeps building the wrong UI and you are re-rolling prompts. How to write the brief, which references and constraints to give, how to iterate…