Skip to content
Development
Skill

/judge-when-to-ask

Decide when AutoCode acts on its own and when it must stop and ask the user. Runs before any consequential action — deleting files, spending money, buying a server, deploying to production, force-pushing, binding a domain, sending or publishing anything. Ordinary reversible work

From plugin
autocode
8648 skills
Install
$ npx -y skills add ilang-ai/autocode --skill judge-when-to-ask --agent claude-code

How it fires

How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.

  • Fires itselfAuto-invocation. Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work.Auto-invocation is when the right skill fires by itself at the right moment, driven by a FLOW.md router and a hook, instead of you invoking it by name. It is the difference between a skill being installed and a skill actually getting used.Read the full definition →
  • You can call itInvoke it directly when you want it.
  • Slash command/judge-when-to-ask

Context preview

The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.

Decide when AutoCode acts on its own and when it must stop and ask the user. Runs before any consequential action — deleting files, spending money, buying a server, deploying to production, force-pushing, binding a domain, sending or publishing anything. Ordinary reversible work

SKILL.md

judge-when-to-ask.SKILL.md
name: judge-when-to-ask
description: Decide when AutoCode acts on its own and when it must stop and ask the user. Runs before any consequential action — deleting files, spending money, buying a server, deploying to production, force-pushing, binding a domain, sending or publishing anything. Ordinary reversible work proceeds silently; only costly or hard-to-undo actions pause for the user. Powered by I-Lang v5.0 vector judgment.
version: 5.0.0

::PRIOR{completion:assume_incomplete|authority:developer} ::PRIOR{execution:act_when_safe|authority:developer}

::GENE{judge-when-to-ask|conf:confirmed|scope:global} T:default_act_on_reversible_low_cost_work T:stop_and_ask_before_costly_or_irreversible T:one_question_when_asking|yes_no_or_plain T:never_expose_internal_judgment_terms A:ask_about_reversible_trivia⇒decide_self A:act_silently_on_irreversible_or_paid⇒stop_first A:show_user_vector_or_mode_words⇒plain_language_only

AutoCode's promise is "AI decides everything, you just say yes or no." That only

works if AI decides the RIGHT things on its own and asks about the RIGHT things.

This skill draws that line using I-Lang v5.0 judgment. The user never sees any of

the machinery below — they only experience an AI that handles the small stuff and

checks in on the big stuff.

::JUDGE{protocol:ilang-v5.0}

Weigh the pending action across the v5.0 dimensions (higher = safer to act alone):

consequence (how bad if wrong), reversibility (how easily undone),

sovereignty (does it spend the user's money without their consent), authority (is it the user's to authorize),

certainty (do I actually know what they want), capability (can I reliably do it).

First match wins — conservative cascade. Modes are internal; never spoken.

RULE:action_hits_a_hard_stop

deletes user data with no backup, force-pushes shared history, publishes

something public irreversibly, or the user earlier said "never do X"

=> MODE:STOP => to_user(plain): state the risk in one sentence, ask if they really want it

RULE:i_dont_actually_know_what_they_want

the request is ambiguous in a way where guessing wrong is expensive

=> MODE:ASK => to_user(plain): ONE yes/no or plain question, then wait

RULE:it_costs_money_or_buys_a_service

buying a VPS, registering a domain, anything that charges the user

=> MODE:CONFIRM => to_user(plain): "This costs about $X. Go ahead?" — name the price, wait

RULE:it_touches_production_or_is_hard_to_undo

deploying to a live site, DB migration, DNS change

=> MODE:CONFIRM => to_user(plain): "I'll do X, ok?" — one line, wait for yes

RULE:reversible_and_within_capability

writing code, scaffolding, local edits, running a build, a revertable commit

=> MODE:EXEC_AUTO => proceed silently, report after ("✅ done")

DEFAULT => MODE:CONFIRM # when unsure, ask rather than surprise the user

::ACTIVATE{judge-when-to-ask} ON:before_delete ON:before_deploy ON:before_purchase ON:before_domain_bind ON:before_force_push ON:before_publish ON:ambiguous_request OFF:reversible_local_edit(no cost, no external effect)

The judgment is RELATIVE by design. "Deploy to production" for a throwaway demo

leans EXEC_AUTO; the same deploy on a project the user called important leans CONFIRM.

Same command, different call — because AutoCode applies the user's own context,

not a fixed rule. That is what makes it feel like it understands them.

::EXAMPLE{

reversible work → just do it, no question

action: create a login page component result: EXEC_AUTO — builds it, then "✅ Login page done (3/8)"

costs money → name the price, wait

action: buy a VPS to deploy result: CONFIRM — "To put this online you'll need a small server, about $6/month. Want me to set that up?"

irreversible + unclear → stop and ask, in plain words

action: user says "clear everything and start over" in a repo with real work result: STOP — "That will erase everything we've built so far and it can't be undone. Are you sure?"

never say this to the user:

forbidden_output: "sovereignty=0.2, resolving to M8 STOP" correct_output: "This can't be undone — sure you want to?" }

Powered by I-Lang v5.0 | ilang.ai | protocol: github.com/ilang-ai/ilang-spec

Read more
Ships withautocode

You say it. AutoCode ships it. 48 skills. Code to deployment in one session. I-Lang v5.0 judgment + secret-safe deploys. Free forever.

Get the whole plugin
Stats
86
Stars
19
Forks
Active
Maintenance
Shell
Language
MIT
License
2d ago
Last commit
6mo ago
Created

Repo: ilang-ai/autocode

Other skills on autocode.