common-agent-guardrail…
Define deterministic guardrails for agent tool calls — protected paths, test-file locks during bug fixes, post-edit formatters, production approval gates,…
Validates bounded cybersecurity exercise observations against approved scope, expected behavior, runtime controls, and redacted evidence. Use when performing safe offline validation or authorized runtime checks with explicit stop and status gates.
$ npx -y skills add hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard --skill cyber-scoped-validation --agent claude-codeHow it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
/cyber-scoped-validationContext preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Validates bounded cybersecurity exercise observations against approved scope, expected behavior, runtime controls, and redacted evidence. Use when performing safe offline validation or authorized runtime checks with explicit stop and status gates.
name: cyber-scoped-validation
guardrail: true
description: Validates bounded cybersecurity exercise observations against approved scope, expected behavior, runtime controls, and redacted evidence. Use when performing safe offline validation or authorized runtime checks with explicit stop and status gates.
metadata:
labels: [cybersecurity, scoped-validation, red-team]
triggers:
keywords: [scoped validation, validate exercise result, authorized validation, scope check, runtime support check, validation evidence]Validate one approved claim at a time; unsupported live controls produce a block, not a workaround.
cyber-scoped-validation/ ├── SKILL.md ├── references/validation-record.md └── evals/evals.json
1. Bind claim to engagement/scope reference, authorization window, exclusions, and expected observation. 2. Preflight host controls: tool allowlist, credential source, filesystem, network, logging, and cancellation. 3. Choose safe offline analysis or authorized runtime validation; do not cross scope. 4. Observe once within bounds, capture redacted evidence, and record time, source, limitations, and owner. 5. Assign exactly one `finding_status`: `confirmed`, `suspected`, `blocked`, `not-tested`, or `false-positive`; describe offline scope separately, never invent a status. 6. Stop on expiry, drift, unsafe impact, missing control, or operator stop; route results to independent review.
Validation records carry `engagement_scope_ref`, `skill_version`, `source`, `observed_at`, `finding_status`, `evidence_refs`, `limitations`, and `accountable_owner`.
The portable SDLC standards layer for AI coding agents. Sync once, then work in your own runtime.
Repo: hoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standard
Define deterministic guardrails for agent tool calls — protected paths, test-file locks during bug fixes, post-edit formatters, production approval gates,…
Draws architecture diagrams as editable draw.io files with a fixed house style, C4 levels, evidence-tagged shapes, and optional multi-view identity checks. Use…
Enforce SOLID principles, guard-clause style, function size limits, and intention-revealing naming across all languages. Use when refactoring for readability,…
Standardize BRD and BRD-lite discovery for business goals, stakeholder impact, current-to-future state, and measurable value outcomes. Use when creating BRD,…
Conduct high-quality, persona-driven code reviews. Use when reviewing PRs, critiquing code quality, or analyzing changes for team feedback.
Maximize context window efficiency, reduce latency, and prevent lost-in-middle issues through strategic masking and compaction. Use when token budgets are…